Board Of Supervisors — Tuesday, January 13, 2015
This is the plain-text record. Open this meeting in the interactive archive for video timestamps, search and vote comparisons.
1. Call to Order
2. Moment of Silence
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Presentation of Animals at the Animal Care and Control Shelter
5. Consideration of Items Not Appearing on the Posted Agenda (Extra Items)
6. Current Construction Projects - Contract Change Orders
7. Approval of the Consent Agenda
7.1Approve Minutes of the Board of Supervisors meetings held December 16, 2014 and January 6, 2015.
Minutes
passed on consent
Clerk’s notes: Minutes of the Board of Supervisors meeting held January 6, 2015 were not ready for approval.
7.2Approve Amendment Number One to the MOU with the Lake County Safety Employees’ Association, Unit 10, from July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015.
Action Item
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
As you may recall on December 16, 2014, your Board approved a Memoranda of Understanding with the Lake County Safety Employees' Association (LCSEA). Upon approval of the MOU, an omission pertaining to shift differentials was discovered. This provision was not discussed during the MOU negotiations and all parties intended for all previously negotiated terms to remain the same.
Presented for approval by your Board is an amendment to the MOU to include shift differential compensation for employees assigned to Unit 10. The amendment is necessary in order include the provision to the compensation section of the MOU. The specific change resulting in the amendment to the current MOU is listed below:
1) The amendment includes compensation for employees in Unit 10 to receive an additional two and one-half percent (2.5%) of base salary as shift differential for assigned work shifts of which at least five hours are between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends the Board approve the proposed amendment and authorize the Chair to sign.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Shanda Harry, Deputy County Counsel
Christopher Shaver, Deputy County Administrative Officer
DATE: January 13, 2015
SUBJECT: Approve Amendment Number One to the MOU with the Lake County Safety Employees' Association, Unit 10, from July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
As you may recall on December 16, 2014, your Board approved a Memoranda of Understanding with the Lake County Safety Employees' Association (LCSEA). Upon approval of the MOU, an omission pertaining to shift differentials was discovered. This provision was not discussed during the MOU negotiations and all parties intended for all previously negotiated terms to remain the same.
Presented for approval by your Board is an amendment to the MOU to include shift differential compensation for employees assigned to Unit 10. The amendment is necessary in order include the provision to the compensation section of the MOU. The specific change resulting in the amendment to the current MOU is listed below:
1) The amendment includes compensation for employees in Unit 10 to receive an additional two and one-half percent (2.5%) of base salary as shift differential for assigned work shifts of which at least five hours are between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends the Board approve the proposed amendment and authorize the Chair to sign.
7.3Approve Resolution No. 2014/2015.04 of Upper Lake Union Elementary School District Amending its Conflict of Interest Code.
Action Item
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The above referenced Resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Upper Lake Union Elementary School District's Board of Trustees on December 17, 2014, and was sent to your Board for approval.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve Upper Lake Union Elementary School District's Resolution 2014/2015.04, which amends their Conflict of Interest Code.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Sara Shucart, Asst. Clerk of the Board
DATE: December 26, 2014
SUBJECT: Approval of a Resolution Amending Updates to the Conflict of Interest Code for Upper Lake Union Elementary School District
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The above referenced Resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Upper Lake Union Elementary School District's Board of Trustees on December 17, 2014, and was sent to your Board for approval.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve Upper Lake Union Elementary School District's Resolution 2014/2015.04, which amends their Conflict of Interest Code.
7.4Ratify the actions of the DA’s Office to purchase the vehicle from Kathy Fowler and authorize the District Attorney to issue payment to Kathy Fowler Chevrolet in the amount of $37,142.63.
Action Item
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District Attorney's Office (DA's Office) procured a vehicle to replace one that was run off the road and badly damaged. We followed the same purchasing procedure for a vehicle that was purchased several years earlier. The DA's Office was not aware that the Public Works Department has the means to make State Contract purchases and that County Departments are encouraged to use their services.
The vehicle was obtained from the local vendor, Kathy Fowler Chevrolet, for a cost of $37,142.63 - payment has not yet been made. Due to concerns that the vehicle cost was excessive, we asked Fleet Superintendent, Don Hoberg, to give us a quote for the same vehicle under the State Contract. The total cost for the same vehicle was $34,642.63. After applying the local vendor allowance of 10% or max of $2,500, the comparative price is $37,142.63 does not exceed the County's cost to a local vendor.
We respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors (1) ratify the actions of the DA's Office to purchase the vehicle from Kathy Fowler and (2) authorize the District Attorney to issue payment to Kathy Fowler Chevrolet in the amount of $37,142.63.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
We respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors (1) ratify the actions of the DA's Office to purchase the vehicle from Kathy Fowler and (2) authorize the District Attorney to issue payment to Kathy Fowler Chevrolet in the amount of $37,142.63.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Don Anderson, District Attorney
DATE: January 9, 2015
SUBJECT: Ratification of Vehicle Purchase
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The District Attorney's Office (DA's Office) procured a vehicle to replace one that was run off the road and badly damaged. We followed the same purchasing procedure for a vehicle that was purchased several years earlier. The DA's Office was not aware that the Public Works Department has the means to make State Contract purchases and that County Departments are encouraged to use their services.
The vehicle was obtained from the local vendor, Kathy Fowler Chevrolet, for a cost of $37,142.63 - payment has not yet been made. Due to concerns that the vehicle cost was excessive, we asked Fleet Superintendent, Don Hoberg, to give us a quote for the same vehicle under the State Contract. The total cost for the same vehicle was $34,642.63. After applying the local vendor allowance of 10% or max of $2,500, the comparative price is $37,142.63 does not exceed the County's cost to a local vendor.
We respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors (1) ratify the actions of the DA's Office to purchase the vehicle from Kathy Fowler and (2) authorize the District Attorney to issue payment to Kathy Fowler Chevrolet in the amount of $37,142.63.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
We respectfully request that the Board of Supervisors (1) ratify the actions of the DA's Office to purchase the vehicle from Kathy Fowler and (2) authorize the District Attorney to issue payment to Kathy Fowler Chevrolet in the amount of $37,142.63.
7.5Adopt Resolution Amending Resolution 2014-129; Appointing Directors of Certain Special District Boards In Lieu Of Holding A General District Election On November 4, 2014.
Resolution
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The attached resolution titled "Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2014-129; Appointing Directors of Certain Special District Boards In Lieu Of Holding A General District Election On November 4, 2014", is being submitted for the Board's approval pursuant to Section 10515 of the Elections Code, State of California.
I am submitting this amended resolution to your Board for approval to correct my error of omitting the name of a qualified candidates name on the passed and adopted Resolution No. 2014-129 in which candidates from other special districts were appointed on Election Day, November 4, 2014 in lieu of election.
Your Board may accept this District Board of Director's recommendation or appoint any other qualified person(s) to serve as director.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Diane C. Fridley
Registrar of Voters
DATE: December 10, 2014
SUBJECT: Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2014-129
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The attached resolution titled "Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2014-129; Appointing Directors of Certain Special District Boards In Lieu Of Holding A General District Election On November 4, 2014", is being submitted for the Board's approval pursuant to Section 10515 of the Elections Code, State of California.
I am submitting this amended resolution to your Board for approval to correct my error of omitting the name of a qualified candidates name on the passed and adopted Resolution No. 2014-129 in which candidates from other special districts were appointed on Election Day, November 4, 2014 in lieu of election.
Your Board may accept this District Board of Director's recommendation or appoint any other qualified person(s) to serve as director.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
7.6Authorize District Attorney to sign Final Proof of Loss Statement relative to damaged 2007 Ford F-150 pick-up.
Action Item
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On August 27, 2014 a District Attorney Investigator was en route home in his County vehicle. The vehicle was very badly damaged. The insurance company for the responsible party and the District Attorney's Office concur that it would be neither safe nor cost effective to repair the vehicle to its original state. It has taken several months for the responsible party's insurance company as well as the County's insurance adjuster to review the case and make their assessments. After consultations between the County adjuster, Insurance adjustor and District Attorney staff, it was agreed that the cost of repairing the vehicle would exceed the value of the vehicle.
The claims adjuster, McLarens, submitted their Statement of Value and Loss and has asked that a County representative execute the Final Proof of Loss with a notarized signature.
This is the same vehicle and incident that was the subject of Board agenda item #7.3 on January 6, 2015. Authorization to execute this document was inadvertently omitted from the previous agenda item.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Board of Supervisors authorize the District Attorney to execute, on behalf of the County, the Final Proof of Loss with a notarized signature.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Members of the Lake County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Don A. Anderson, District Attorney
DATE: January 2, 2015
SUBJECT: Authorize District Attorney to sign Final Proof of Loss Statement relative to damaged 2007 Ford F-150 pick-up
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On August 27, 2014 a District Attorney Investigator was en route home in his County vehicle. The vehicle was very badly damaged. The insurance company for the responsible party and the District Attorney's Office concur that it would be neither safe nor cost effective to repair the vehicle to its original state. It has taken several months for the responsible party's insurance company as well as the County's insurance adjuster to review the case and make their assessments. After consultations between the County adjuster, Insurance adjustor and District Attorney staff, it was agreed that the cost of repairing the vehicle would exceed the value of the vehicle.
The claims adjuster, McLarens, submitted their Statement of Value and Loss and has asked that a County representative execute the Final Proof of Loss with a notarized signature.
This is the same vehicle and incident that was the subject of Board agenda item #7.3 on January 6, 2015. Authorization to execute this document was inadvertently omitted from the previous agenda item.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Board of Supervisors authorize the District Attorney to execute, on behalf of the County, the Final Proof of Loss with a notarized signature.
7.7Approve Agreement between the County of Lake and Bender Rosenthal, Inc. to provide Right of Way Services for Four (4) Bridge Replacement Projects (Anderson Creek Bridge on Foard Road (14C-0076), Manning Creek Bridge on Mathews Road (14C-0082), Manning Creek Bridge on Ackley Road (14C-0083) and Highland Creek Bridge on Highland Springs Road (14C-0085)) and Two (2) Bridge Rehabilitation Projects (Robinson Creek Bridge on Mockingbird Lane (14C-0086) and Harbin Creek Bridge on Harbin Springs Road (14C-0111)) in Lake County, California, in the amount of $137,500, and authorize the Chair to sign.
Agreement
passed on consent
approved — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Smith (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 27, 2011, the Department of Public Works entered into an Agreement with Quincy Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services for Four (4) Bridge Replacement Projects and Two (2) Bridge Rehabilitation Projects in Lake County, CA. Based on the original agreement, the County was to perform the appraisal and acquisition services for the affected properties with County staff. However, due to the retirement of the County Right of Way Agent, the County no longer has the required certifications and expertise to perform these services. Therefore, it became necessary to engage the services of a consultant who is licensed to perform appraisal and acquisition services. Quincy's Agreement could not be amended since these services were not included in the scope of services for the original Request for Proposals.
The Department of Public Works solicited proposals from firms with experience in providing right of way appraisal and acquisition services. Six proposals were received in response to the Request for Proposals. A consultant selection panel reviewed the proposals in accordance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), Chapter 10, and the County of Lake policy for review and selection of professional consultants and found Bender Rosenthal, Inc. to be the most qualified of the six proposers. Staff has negotiated the proposed fee with Bender Rosenthal, Inc. and they have agreed that the fee for their services as scoped in the agreement will not exceed $137,500.
This project is 100% funded for construction with state and federal funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans offer Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds and California Toll Credit funds to eligible projects. The FHWA, in an agreement with Caltrans, provides for the use of toll credits in lieu of local matching funds.
This project is 100% funded for construction with state and federal funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans offer Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds and California Toll Credit funds to eligible projects. The FHWA, in an agreement with Caltrans, provides for the use of toll credits in lieu of local matching funds.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $137,500
Amount Budgeted: $137,500
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
This project is 100% funded for construction with state and federal funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans offer Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds and California Toll Credit funds to eligible projects. The FHWA, in an agreement with Caltrans, provides for the use of toll credits in lieu of local matching funds.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This project is 100% funded for construction with state and federal funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans offer Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds and California Toll Credit funds to eligible projects. The FHWA, in an agreement with Caltrans, provides for the use of toll credits in lieu of local matching funds.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director
DATE: December 29, 2014
SUBJECT: Consent Agenda Item for January 13, 2015 - Approve Agreement between the County of Lake and Bender Rosenthal, Inc. to provide Right of Way Services for Four (4) Bridge Replacement Projects and Two (2) Bridge Rehabilitation Projects in Lake County, California
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 27, 2011, the Department of Public Works entered into an Agreement with Quincy Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services for Four (4) Bridge Replacement Projects and Two (2) Bridge Rehabilitation Projects in Lake County, CA. Based on the original agreement, the County was to perform the appraisal and acquisition services for the affected properties with County staff. However, due to the retirement of the County Right of Way Agent, the County no longer has the required certifications and expertise to perform these services. Therefore, it became necessary to engage the services of a consultant who is licensed to perform appraisal and acquisition services. Quincy's Agreement could not be amended since these services were not included in the scope of services for the original Request for Proposals.
The Department of Public Works solicited proposals from firms with experience in providing right of way appraisal and acquisition services. Six proposals were received in response to the Request for Proposals. A consultant selection panel reviewed the proposals in accordance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), Chapter 10, and the County of Lake policy for review and selection of professional consultants and found Bender Rosenthal, Inc. to be the most qualified of the six proposers. Staff has negotiated the proposed fee with Bender Rosenthal, Inc. and they have agreed that the fee for their services as scoped in the agreement will not exceed $137,500.
This project is 100% funded for construction with state and federal funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans offer Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds and California Toll Credit funds to eligible projects. The FHWA, in an agreement with Caltrans, provides for the use of toll credits in lieu of local matching funds.
This project is 100% funded for construction with state and federal funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans offer Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds and California Toll Credit funds to eligible projects. The FHWA, in an agreement with Caltrans, provides for the use of toll credits in lieu of local matching funds.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $137,500
Amount Budgeted: $137,500
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
This project is 100% funded for construction with state and federal funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans offer Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds and California Toll Credit funds to eligible projects. The FHWA, in an agreement with Caltrans, provides for the use of toll credits in lieu of local matching funds.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This project is 100% funded for construction with state and federal funds. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans offer Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds and California Toll Credit funds to eligible projects. The FHWA, in an agreement with Caltrans, provides for the use of toll credits in lieu of local matching funds.
On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved as amended Consent Agenda items 7.1 - 7.7. The motion carried by the following vote:
8. Timed Items
8.19:05 A.M. - Public Input
Report
Clerk’s notes: Larry Anderson spoke.
8.29:10 A.M. - Introduction of new California Highway Patrol Lieutenant Hector Paredes.
Report
This item was an introduction only.
Clerk’s notes: California Highway Patrol Lieutenant Hector Paredes intoduced himself to the Board.
8.39:15 A.M. - "Our Way to Wellville - Lake County" - presentation by Susan Jen
Report
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the request of Susan Jen, this item is being brought to your Board as an informational presentation to update you and the community on the Wellville Challenge our County is currently participating in.
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This item is informational only, no Board action is requested.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Carol Cole-Lewis, Assistant to Susan Jen
DATE: January 2, 2015
SUBJECT: Update on the Wellville Challenge Lake County is participating in
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the request of Susan Jen, this item is being brought to your Board as an informational presentation to update you and the community on the Wellville Challenge our County is currently participating in.
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This item is informational only, no Board action is requested.
This item was informational only. No Board action was required.
Clerk’s notes: Wellville Representatives Susan Jenn and Wally Holbrook gave a presentation to the Board.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.49:30 A.M. - Swearing in ceremony for Sheriff's Office employees
Report
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Sheriff's Office requests a timed item of approximately ten (10) minutes to perform a swearing in ceremony for newly hired employees and existing staff members. It is important for the Sheriff to swear in all new employees of the Sheriff's office, as this allows staff to feel they are working for a professional organization. By doing this, it will also unify the Sheriff's office and create a team atmosphere which will, in turn, enhance the overall operations within every Division of the Sheriff's Office.
FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Sheriff-Elect Brian Martin
DATE: December 4, 2014
SUBJECT: Swearing-In ceremony
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Sheriff's Office requests a timed item of approximately ten (10) minutes to perform a swearing in ceremony for newly hired employees and existing staff members. It is important for the Sheriff to swear in all new employees of the Sheriff's office, as this allows staff to feel they are working for a professional organization. By doing this, it will also unify the Sheriff's office and create a team atmosphere which will, in turn, enhance the overall operations within every Division of the Sheriff's Office.
FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Clerk’s notes: Sheriff Martin introduced new Sheriff staff members Stephen Tong, Victor Rico, Jason Pisaro, Shamus Stafford and Jason Koran.
Sheriff Martin administered Oath of Office to said deputies.
The Board of Supervisors gave their support and thanks to the new and existing Sheriff office staff.
8.59:35 A.M. - (Carried over from January 13, 2015) - SECOND READING - Consideration of amendment to Lake County Ordinance No. 2991, An Ordinance Adding Article Seven to Chapter Seven of the Lake County Code to Provide Support for Public, Educational, and Governmental Cable Television Access Facilities to either modify or remove the condition that the ordinance shall only become effective upon a determination by the Attorney General that the PEG fee is not a tax subject to Proposition 26.
Ordinance
Adopted — Pass
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Supervisor Rushing has requested the Board to consider amending Section 7.39 of the Lake County Code regarding the PEG channel to remove the condition that the 1% pass-through would become effective upon the determination by the Attorney General that the PEG fee is not a tax subject to Proposition 26. County Counsel Anita Grant has prepared an ordinance for the Boards consideration.
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
-Adopt Ordinance Amending Section 7.39 of Article Seven of Chapter Seven of the Lake County Code Establishing a Fee to Support the Public, Educational, and Government ("PEG") Access Channel to Delete the Conditional Effective Date of the Ordinance
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Matt Perry, County Administrative Officer
DATE: December 12, 2014
SUBJECT: SECOND READING - Adopt Ordinance Amending Section 7.39 of Article Seven of Chapter Seven of the Lake County Code Establishing a Fee to Support the Public, Educational, and Government ("PEG") Access Channel to Delete the Conditional Effective Date of the Ordinance.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Supervisor Rushing has requested the Board to consider amending Section 7.39 of the Lake County Code regarding the PEG channel to remove the condition that the 1% pass-through would become effective upon the determination by the Attorney General that the PEG fee is not a tax subject to Proposition 26. County Counsel Anita Grant has prepared an ordinance for the Boards consideration.
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
-Adopt Ordinance Amending Section 7.39 of Article Seven of Chapter Seven of the Lake County Code Establishing a Fee to Support the Public, Educational, and Government ("PEG") Access Channel to Delete the Conditional Effective Date of the Ordinance
Supervisor Smith offered the Ordinance, and it was passed bu roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: Chair Farrington introduced the item. This item was carred over from January 13, 2015 to allow Supervisor Steele time to review. County Counsel Anita Grant addressed Board concerns from last week.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone from present wished to speak and the following people spoke: PEG Chairman Ed Robey spoke, Dante DiAmici, Shawn Swatosh of Mediacom and Robert Randolph Thug. No one else present withed to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9. Non-Timed Items
9.1Supervisors' weekly calendar, travel and reports.
Report
9.2Consideration of options to fill vacant position in Administrative Office.
Resolution
Adopted — Pass
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
As the Board knows there is a significant vacancy in my office. I have considered alternatives to fill the position and determined what level of experience and knowledge is needed to perform the responsibilities of the position. Before recruiting to fill this position, I would like to discuss alternatives with the Board.
After I was promoted to the position of County Administrative Officer, I chose to leave my former position of Chief Deputy County Administrative Officer vacant due to budget limitations and it was removed from the position allocation in the subsequent fiscal year.
After much hesitation and deliberation, I have decided to request that your Board re-allocate the classification of Chief Deputy CAO and also establish a new classification of Assistant County Administrative Officer (Assistant CAO).
If approved, I recommend that the Chief Deputy CAO and Assistant CAO classification be allocated in a flexible series allocation along with a Deputy CAO. This would be one position that could be filled at one of three levels depending on the experience and qualifications of the best candidate.
I have recently discussed this with the Classification and Compensation Committee. They support the request in concept and as of this writing, I am still working with Human Resources to determine an appropriate salary level for the Assistant CAO position. I expect to have a recommendation to present to the Board on January 13.
I appreciate your Board's support and consideration of these alternatives.
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Matt Perry, County Administrative Officer
DATE: January 9, 2015
SUBJECT: Consideration of Options to Fill Vacant Deputy County Administrative Officer Position in County Administrative Office
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
As the Board knows there is a significant vacancy in my office. I have considered alternatives to fill the position and determined what level of experience and knowledge is needed to perform the responsibilities of the position. Before recruiting to fill this position, I would like to discuss alternatives with the Board.
After I was promoted to the position of County Administrative Officer, I chose to leave my former position of Chief Deputy County Administrative Officer vacant due to budget limitations and it was removed from the position allocation in the subsequent fiscal year.
After much hesitation and deliberation, I have decided to request that your Board re-allocate the classification of Chief Deputy CAO and also establish a new classification of Assistant County Administrative Officer (Assistant CAO).
If approved, I recommend that the Chief Deputy CAO and Assistant CAO classification be allocated in a flexible series allocation along with a Deputy CAO. This would be one position that could be filled at one of three levels depending on the experience and qualifications of the best candidate.
I have recently discussed this with the Classification and Compensation Committee. They support the request in concept and as of this writing, I am still working with Human Resources to determine an appropriate salary level for the Assistant CAO position. I expect to have a recommendation to present to the Board on January 13.
I appreciate your Board's support and consideration of these alternatives.
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: County Administrative Officer Matt Perry presented the item to the Board.
Staff was directed to bring an item to the Board next week for further discussion of eliminating Board member mileage reimbursement to assist with budgeting a higher level position in the administrative office.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.3Consideration of the following appointments:
Law Library Board of Trustees
Appointment
approved — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Comstock (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
1. Law Library Board of Trustees: Two (2) vacancies - BOS Chair or Appointee, Member of the Bar
Application received: Shanda Harry - incumbent - BOS appointee
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Sara Shucart, Asst. Clerk of the Board
DATE: December 26, 2014
SUBJECT: Consideration of Appointments
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
1. Law Library Board of Trustees: Two (2) vacancies - BOS Chair or Appointee, Member of the Bar
Application received: Shanda Harry - incumbent - BOS appointee
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, re-appointed Shanda Harry to the Law Library Board of Trustees. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Chair Farrington presented the item to the Board. County Counsel Anita Grant spoke.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
10. Closed Session
10.1Conference with Labor Negotiator: (a) County Negotiators: A. Grant, S. Harry, M. Perry and C. Shaver; and (b) Employee Organizations: DDAA, DSA, LCCOA, LCEA and LCSEA.
10.2Conference with legal counsel: Existing litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(1): Rivero v. Lake County Board of Supervisors, et al.
Closed Session Item
10.3Conference with Legal Counsel: Decision whether to initiate litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(4): One potential case.
Closed Session Item
Clerk’s notes: The Board reconvened into Regular Session at 10:58 a.m. having taken no action.