Board Of Supervisors — Tuesday, February 3, 2015
This is the plain-text record. Open this meeting in the interactive archive for video timestamps, search and vote comparisons.
1. Call to Order
2. Moment of Silence
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Presentation of Animals at the Animal Care and Control Shelter
5. Consideration of Items Not Appearing on the Posted Agenda (Extra Items)
6. Current Construction Projects - Contract Change Orders
7. Approval of the Consent Agenda
7.1Approve Minutes of the Board of Supervisors meeting held January 27, 2015.
Minutes
passed on consent
7.2Authorize extension of reduced public hours (i.e. 11:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday and 11:00 am to 3:00 pm on Saturday) at the Lake County Animal Control Shelter through February 2015.
Action Item
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
During the Budget Hearings on September 3, 2014 the Board took action to approve a reduction in public hours at the Animal Control Shelter for a 4 month trial period from October 2014 through January 2015.
Following an update from Animal Control Director Bill Davidson on January 27, 2015, there was Board consensus to continue this reduced schedule until the Board discusses this matter again on March 3, 2015.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends the Board approve an extension of this reduction in public hours through February 2015 until the Board discusses this matter again on March 3, 2015.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Matt Perry, County Administrative Officer
DATE: February 3, 2015
SUBJECT: Authorize extension of reduced public hours (i.e. 11:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday and 11:00 am to 3:00 pm on Saturday) at the Lake County Animal Control Shelter through February 2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
During the Budget Hearings on September 3, 2014 the Board took action to approve a reduction in public hours at the Animal Control Shelter for a 4 month trial period from October 2014 through January 2015.
Following an update from Animal Control Director Bill Davidson on January 27, 2015, there was Board consensus to continue this reduced schedule until the Board discusses this matter again on March 3, 2015.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends the Board approve an extension of this reduction in public hours through February 2015 until the Board discusses this matter again on March 3, 2015.
7.3Adopt Proclamation Designating the Month of February as Black History Month and Celebrating Martin Luther King's Birthday.
Proclamation
passed on consent
7.4(Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District Board of Directors) - Re-Appoint Roger Bakke, PE Professional Engineer to the LCAQMD Hearing Board pursuant to Health and Safety Code.
Appointment
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Roger Bakke has served for the past 12 years as the Professional Engineer Member on the LCAQMD Hearing Board. California Health & Safety Code Section 40801 requires one Legal Professional, one Professional Engineer, one Medical Professional, and two Public Members be represented on the Hearing Board.
Mr. Bakke has a Masters Degree in Mechanical Engineering from UC Berkeley and currently is a Registered Professional Engineer. Mr. Bakke has resided in the community for a number of years and brings valued perspective and experience to the Hearing Board.
The Hearing Board has met less frequently in recent years, but prior years has met up to 8 times a year. The hearing process is both legalistic and technical in nature. Continuing Hearing Board members, as has been the case for the present Hearing Board, has helped greatly in making the process work smoothly and in the publics interest. Because of infrequent meetings, the advantages of having experienced Hearing Board members, and the fact that Mr. Bakke has indicated his willingness to continue, we ask that you reappoint him.
Staff believes the LCAQMD is fortunate to have a Member with such strong credentials, history, and unique understanding of our community and environmental matters and is willing to continue to serve on the LCAQMD Hearing Board.
FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Board re-appoint Roger Bakke, PE, as the Professional Engineer Member to the LCAQMD Hearing Board for a three year term.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Douglas Gearhart, APCO
DATE: January 20, 2015
SUBJECT: Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District Board of Directors Request Re-Appointment of Roger Bakke, PE Professional Engineer to the LCAQMD Hearing Board pursuant to Health and Safety Code.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Roger Bakke has served for the past 12 years as the Professional Engineer Member on the LCAQMD Hearing Board. California Health & Safety Code Section 40801 requires one Legal Professional, one Professional Engineer, one Medical Professional, and two Public Members be represented on the Hearing Board.
Mr. Bakke has a Masters Degree in Mechanical Engineering from UC Berkeley and currently is a Registered Professional Engineer. Mr. Bakke has resided in the community for a number of years and brings valued perspective and experience to the Hearing Board.
The Hearing Board has met less frequently in recent years, but prior years has met up to 8 times a year. The hearing process is both legalistic and technical in nature. Continuing Hearing Board members, as has been the case for the present Hearing Board, has helped greatly in making the process work smoothly and in the publics interest. Because of infrequent meetings, the advantages of having experienced Hearing Board members, and the fact that Mr. Bakke has indicated his willingness to continue, we ask that you reappoint him.
Staff believes the LCAQMD is fortunate to have a Member with such strong credentials, history, and unique understanding of our community and environmental matters and is willing to continue to serve on the LCAQMD Hearing Board.
FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Board re-appoint Roger Bakke, PE, as the Professional Engineer Member to the LCAQMD Hearing Board for a three year term.
7.5Approve Contract between the County of Lake and Lake County Office of Education for Foster Youth Services, V-1 for the duration of September 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015, in the amount of $39,492.50 and authorize the Chair to sign.
Action Item
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Lake County Office of Education (LCOE) currently receives funding from the California Department of Education to provide services to foster youth attending Lake County schools. In order to expand these services, we have partnered with LCOE to provide additional case management services to children living in licensed foster homes or with approved relatives or non-related extended family members. Services under this contract include a LCOE staff liaison to ensure facilitation of services between our departments, the foster family, the school and the child.
LCOE provides all matching funds necessary for our department to claim Federal Title IV-E dollars to pay this contract expense. There is no County cost.
The term of this Contract is September 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015, to coincide with the school year.
FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted _X_Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $ 39,492.50
Amount Budgeted: See Fiscal Impact Narrative
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
This contract was not specifically budgeted in our 14/15 Budget for BU 5011 because the details had not been clarified at that time. However, we have sufficient savings in object code 23.80 to fund this expense without any adjustment to our approved budget.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
None
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
We recommend that your Board approve this Contract between the County of Lake and the Lake County Office of Education for Foster Youth Services, authorizing the Chair to sign.
Thank you for your consideration.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Carol J. Huchingson, Social Services Director
DATE: January 21, 2015
SUBJECT: Contract Between the County of Lake and Lake County Office of Education
for Foster Youth Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Lake County Office of Education (LCOE) currently receives funding from the California Department of Education to provide services to foster youth attending Lake County schools. In order to expand these services, we have partnered with LCOE to provide additional case management services to children living in licensed foster homes or with approved relatives or non-related extended family members. Services under this contract include a LCOE staff liaison to ensure facilitation of services between our departments, the foster family, the school and the child.
LCOE provides all matching funds necessary for our department to claim Federal Title IV-E dollars to pay this contract expense. There is no County cost.
The term of this Contract is September 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015, to coincide with the school year.
FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted _X_Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $ 39,492.50
Amount Budgeted: See Fiscal Impact Narrative
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
This contract was not specifically budgeted in our 14/15 Budget for BU 5011 because the details had not been clarified at that time. However, we have sufficient savings in object code 23.80 to fund this expense without any adjustment to our approved budget.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
None
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
We recommend that your Board approve this Contract between the County of Lake and the Lake County Office of Education for Foster Youth Services, authorizing the Chair to sign.
Thank you for your consideration.
7.6Approve Agreement between Lake County Social Services Department and UC Davis Extension for FY 14/15 Peer Quality Case Review, in the amount of $18,500, and authorize the Social Services Director to sign said Agreement.
Action Item
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Lake County Department of Social Services (LCDSS) is required to engage in a five-year cycle of planning with the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) for Child Welfare Services operations. CDSS has set forth the steps for the five-year cycle beginning with a Peer Review process, followed by the County Self Assessment (CSA), and culminating with the System Improvement Plan (SIP).
January, 2015 is the start of the next five-year cycle required by CDSS, which encourages the counties to use their regional training academies to assist with the process. UC Davis is the regional training academy for Northern California, including our county. UC Davis has extensive experience assisting northern California counties in this process. Therefore, pursuant to the attached agreement, LCDSS desires to contract with UC Davis to assist with the Peer Review and CSA.
The Agreement includes costs and services related to the Peer Review and CSA for Lake County, including planning; preparation of the Peer Review report; rental of meeting spaces; accommodations, food service, and travel reimbursement for up to six members of the review team (staff from other counties); accommodations and food service for UC Davis staff while conducting the Peer Review; facilitation of CSA stakeholder meetings and focus groups; and any other technical assistance needed to complete these first steps of the five-year cycle. The total compensation in the Agreement is $18,500.00.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $18,500
Amount Budgeted: $18,500
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
None
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
None
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
We recommend that your Board approve this Agreement for Services with UC Davis Extension, authorizing the Social Service Director to execute the Agreement.
CC: Kathy Maes, Deputy SS Director
Leila Haddad, Supervising SSA
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Carol J. Huchingson, Social Services Director
DATE: January 21, 2015
SUBJECT: Agreement for Services UC Davis Extension (for Peer Quality Case Review)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Lake County Department of Social Services (LCDSS) is required to engage in a five-year cycle of planning with the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) for Child Welfare Services operations. CDSS has set forth the steps for the five-year cycle beginning with a Peer Review process, followed by the County Self Assessment (CSA), and culminating with the System Improvement Plan (SIP).
January, 2015 is the start of the next five-year cycle required by CDSS, which encourages the counties to use their regional training academies to assist with the process. UC Davis is the regional training academy for Northern California, including our county. UC Davis has extensive experience assisting northern California counties in this process. Therefore, pursuant to the attached agreement, LCDSS desires to contract with UC Davis to assist with the Peer Review and CSA.
The Agreement includes costs and services related to the Peer Review and CSA for Lake County, including planning; preparation of the Peer Review report; rental of meeting spaces; accommodations, food service, and travel reimbursement for up to six members of the review team (staff from other counties); accommodations and food service for UC Davis staff while conducting the Peer Review; facilitation of CSA stakeholder meetings and focus groups; and any other technical assistance needed to complete these first steps of the five-year cycle. The total compensation in the Agreement is $18,500.00.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $18,500
Amount Budgeted: $18,500
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
None
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
None
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
We recommend that your Board approve this Agreement for Services with UC Davis Extension, authorizing the Social Service Director to execute the Agreement.
CC: Kathy Maes, Deputy SS Director
Leila Haddad, Supervising SSA
7.7Approve Agreement with Forensic Medical Group, Inc for Forensic Pathology Services, from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2016 with one year extensions, amount undetermined, and authorize the Chair to sign.
Report
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Sheriff's Office requests your approval of the attached contract for forensic pathology services with Forensic Medical Group, Inc. This contract is in addition to the one currently held with Dr. Jacqueline Benjamin and will be used on an "as needed" basis. This contract is retroactive to July 1, 2014 due to outstanding invoices.
.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _x_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
Payment for these services is made from the Sheriff/Coroner budget 2201, object code 23.80 and is currently budgeted.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approval
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Anthony Farrington, Chairman, Board of Supervisors
FROM: Brian L. Martin, Sheriff/Coroner
DATE: January 21, 2015
SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement with Forensic Medical Group, Inc. for Forensic Pathology Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Sheriff's Office requests your approval of the attached contract for forensic pathology services with Forensic Medical Group, Inc. This contract is in addition to the one currently held with Dr. Jacqueline Benjamin and will be used on an "as needed" basis. This contract is retroactive to July 1, 2014 due to outstanding invoices.
.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _x_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
Payment for these services is made from the Sheriff/Coroner budget 2201, object code 23.80 and is currently budgeted.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approval
7.8Approve out-of-state travel for Water Resources staff Chris White and Mark Miller to attend "Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention Project" program administered by the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commisison.
Action Item
passed on consent
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission administers a program called the "Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention Project". Part of this program includes "Level 2" training for the inspection, identification and decontamination of Quagga Mussels on various types of watercraft. The training sessions consist of two days of instruction, and they are held at Lake Mead. This training course is designed for those individuals who are currently or will soon become active in implementing watercraft inspection and decontamination programs for their respective agencies. It provides the latest techniques on actual field inspection and decontamination of various types of watercraft. As the Department responsible for the implementation of the quagga mussel prevention program in Lake County, it is imperative to keep current on the techniques for watercraft inspection and the latest development in decontaminating those vessels. The training course will be held on February 24th and 25th.
As a secondary benefit, staff will visit the marina that currently moors our display boat. This vessel is a non-operational 13.5 foot Bayliner that is intended to be fouled with mussels, coated with lacquer, and placed on a custom trailer for the purpose of displaying the devastating effects the mussels have on vessels.
Pursuant to Board Policy, the Department requests approval for out of state travel for Chris White and Mark Miller to attend this training.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $967.00
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Pursuant to Board Policy, the Department requests approval for out of state travel for Chris White and Mark Miller to attend this training.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lake County Board of Supervisors
FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director
DATE: January 21, 2015
SUBJECT: Approval of Out of State Travel for Water Resources Staff
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission administers a program called the "Aquatic Invasive Species Prevention Project". Part of this program includes "Level 2" training for the inspection, identification and decontamination of Quagga Mussels on various types of watercraft. The training sessions consist of two days of instruction, and they are held at Lake Mead. This training course is designed for those individuals who are currently or will soon become active in implementing watercraft inspection and decontamination programs for their respective agencies. It provides the latest techniques on actual field inspection and decontamination of various types of watercraft. As the Department responsible for the implementation of the quagga mussel prevention program in Lake County, it is imperative to keep current on the techniques for watercraft inspection and the latest development in decontaminating those vessels. The training course will be held on February 24th and 25th.
As a secondary benefit, staff will visit the marina that currently moors our display boat. This vessel is a non-operational 13.5 foot Bayliner that is intended to be fouled with mussels, coated with lacquer, and placed on a custom trailer for the purpose of displaying the devastating effects the mussels have on vessels.
Pursuant to Board Policy, the Department requests approval for out of state travel for Chris White and Mark Miller to attend this training.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $967.00
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Pursuant to Board Policy, the Department requests approval for out of state travel for Chris White and Mark Miller to attend this training.
7.9Approve Contract between the County of Lake and Cathy Ferron and Associates for the Child Welfare Services Title IV- E Waiver Project Evaluation, from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, in the amount of $30,000.00, and authorize the Chair to sign.
Action Item
passed on consent
approved — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Smith (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 23, 2014 your Board approved the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the California Department of Social Services and the County of Lake Departments of Social Services and Probation for the Title IV-E California Well-Being Project. We are now bringing to you the corresponding contract for project evaluation services.
As part of the California Well-Being Project, we are required to provide quantifiable results to the California Department of Social Services on the outcomes of the Family Wraparound program and other interventions provided to previously ineligible families in order to reduce entry into the Child Welfare and Probation systems.
Ms. Ferron has extensive knowledge and experience in providing evaluation services and has worked extensively with our department. During the term of this contract, Ms. Ferron will work closely with staff to develop internal capacity for local evaluation.
The term of this contract commences January 1, 2015 and runs through June 30, 2016.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None X Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Amount Budgeted: $20,000
Additional Requested: none
Annual Cost (if planned for future years): $30,000
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
Federal funds will pay for fifty percent (50%) of all costs. The remaining portion will be funded completely by Realignment 1991 and Realignment 2011, resulting in no County cost.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
None
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve Contract between the County of Lake and Ferron & Associates for the Child Welfare Services Title IV-E Waiver Project Evaluation, authorizing the Chair to sign.
CC: Kathy Maes, Deputy SS Director
Leila Haddad, Supervising SSA
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Carol J. Huchingson, Social Services Director
DATE: January 21, 2015
SUBJECT: Contract Between the County of Lake and Ferron and Associates for the Child Welfare
Services Title IV- E Waiver Project Evaluation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 23, 2014 your Board approved the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the California Department of Social Services and the County of Lake Departments of Social Services and Probation for the Title IV-E California Well-Being Project. We are now bringing to you the corresponding contract for project evaluation services.
As part of the California Well-Being Project, we are required to provide quantifiable results to the California Department of Social Services on the outcomes of the Family Wraparound program and other interventions provided to previously ineligible families in order to reduce entry into the Child Welfare and Probation systems.
Ms. Ferron has extensive knowledge and experience in providing evaluation services and has worked extensively with our department. During the term of this contract, Ms. Ferron will work closely with staff to develop internal capacity for local evaluation.
The term of this contract commences January 1, 2015 and runs through June 30, 2016.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None X Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $20,000
Amount Budgeted: $20,000
Additional Requested: none
Annual Cost (if planned for future years): $30,000
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
Federal funds will pay for fifty percent (50%) of all costs. The remaining portion will be funded completely by Realignment 1991 and Realignment 2011, resulting in no County cost.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
None
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve Contract between the County of Lake and Ferron & Associates for the Child Welfare Services Title IV-E Waiver Project Evaluation, authorizing the Chair to sign.
CC: Kathy Maes, Deputy SS Director
Leila Haddad, Supervising SSA
On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved Consent Agenda Items 7.1 - 7.9. The motion carried by the following vote:
8. Timed Items
8.19:05 A.M. - Public Input
Clerk’s notes: Larry Anderson spoke regarding an audit of land records.
8.29:10 A.M. - Presentation of Proclamation Designating the Month of February Black History Month and Celebrating Martin Luther King's Birthday
Proclamation
Clerk’s notes: Supervisor Steele read the proclamation into the record and presented it to Rick Mayo. There were several supporters present.
8.39:15 A.M. - Presentation of 2014 Public Works Project Summary and Upcoming Project Plan
Report
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A presentation will be given by Public Works staff summarizing the work performed in 2014 and the plan for upcoming years
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director
DATE: January 21, 2015
SUBJECT: Presentation of 2014 Public Works Project Summary and Upcoming Project Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A presentation will be given by Public Works staff summarizing the work performed in 2014 and the plan for upcoming years
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
This item was informational only. No Board action was requested.
Clerk’s notes: Public Works Director Scott De Leon and Asst. Public Works Director Lars Ewing presentation the 2014 Public Works Project Summary and Upcoming Project Plan to the Board.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.49:30 A.M. - Consideration of Request for Waiver of Construction Traffic Mitigation Fees for Joe Gonsalves
Action Item
approved — Pass
Carried 4-1 — moved by Brown (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: nay Smith: aye Steele: aye
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: nay Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In July, 2007, your Board enacted Ordinance 2842 which established a Traffic Mitigation Fee for construction activity that impacts County roads. The ordinance required a fee of 0.5% of the value of the project, as determined by the Community Development Department, be paid to the Department of Public Works to mitigate the impacts of the construction vehicles on County roads. Under that ordinance, the only circumstance that was afforded an exemption from the fee was the construction of certain projects related to low and moderate income housing. In June, 2010, your Board approved Ordinance 2926 that amended the original exemptions to also include projects that did not impact County roads. That ordinance allowed the Public Works Director to approve waivers for projects that only used State or City roads to deliver materials, or projects where materials were delivered by water. The project for discussion today does not meet either of the exemption conditions, and any waiver of fees must be approved by your Board. I have provided a short summary of the project; however I anticipate that the Owner or a representative will be available to present their argument for support of the waiver.
Joe Gonsalves
In September, 2013, Mr. Gonsalves applied for a Building Permit to construct a residence, garage and covered deck on property at 10550 Seigler Springs North Road. To date, the permit has not been issued due to the fact that this construction is subject to the Traffic Mitigation Fee, and the fee of $1,794.80 has not been paid.
Mr. Gonsalves has recently been represented by a Mr. Richard Adams, and he has been questioning staff about the fee. According to Mr. Adams, when Mr. Gonsalves purchased the property in October, 2008, there was an active building permit that was obtained by the previous Owner in April, 2006. A septic system, well installation, and the foundation had been constructed under that original permit; however construction ceased due to the passing of the previous Owner. This original permit was issued prior to the adoption of Ordinance 2842, and therefor was not subject to the Traffic Mitigation Fee. No additional work was performed on the residence, and the original permit expired in May, 2012. No additional building activity occurred until Mr. Gonsalves applied for a new building permit in September, 2013.
After a discussion with Mr. Adams, he expressed that because the original permit was not subject to the fee, and Mr. Gonsalves is simply renewing the expired permit, he should be exempt from the new fee. In response to that argument, staff offers the following:
* No action was taken by Mr. Gonsalves on the original permit, and it expired in May, 2012;
* Mr. Gonsalves purchased the property and submitted a building permit application for a new residence subsequent to the adoption of Ordinance 2842;
* Even though the new residence is going to utilize the existing foundation that was constructed with the old permit, the new structure is subject to the current fee structure, building construction standards and health and safety requirements - all of which have changed in some form or another since 2006;
* The proposed construction does not meet any of the exemptions allowed by the original and amended Ordinances; therefore the construction is subject to the Traffic Mitigation Fee;
Recommendation
Only the Board of Supervisors can waive the Construction Traffic Mitigation fees under these circumstances. During your consideration, the Department of Public Works would respectfully remind the Board that we have collected approximately $631,500 since the fee was imposed in 2007. While individual amounts are not significant, cumulatively they provide a source of revenue that the Department wouldn't ordinarily have. The Department recently expended $350,000 of the amount referenced above during the summer of 2013 on a pavement rehabilitation project.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Only the Board of Supervisors can waive the Construction Traffic Mitigation fees under these circumstances. During your consideration, the Department of Public Works would respectfully remind the Board that we have collected approximately $631,500 since the fee was imposed in 2007. While individual amounts are not significant, cumulatively they provide a source of revenue that the Department wouldn't ordinarily have. The Department recently expended $350,000 of the amount referenced above during the summer of 2013 on a pavement rehabilitation project.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director
DATE: January 23, 2015
SUBJECT: Consideration of Waiver of Construction Traffic Mitigation Fees for Joe Gonsalves
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In July, 2007, your Board enacted Ordinance 2842 which established a Traffic Mitigation Fee for construction activity that impacts County roads. The ordinance required a fee of 0.5% of the value of the project, as determined by the Community Development Department, be paid to the Department of Public Works to mitigate the impacts of the construction vehicles on County roads. Under that ordinance, the only circumstance that was afforded an exemption from the fee was the construction of certain projects related to low and moderate income housing. In June, 2010, your Board approved Ordinance 2926 that amended the original exemptions to also include projects that did not impact County roads. That ordinance allowed the Public Works Director to approve waivers for projects that only used State or City roads to deliver materials, or projects where materials were delivered by water. The project for discussion today does not meet either of the exemption conditions, and any waiver of fees must be approved by your Board. I have provided a short summary of the project; however I anticipate that the Owner or a representative will be available to present their argument for support of the waiver.
Joe Gonsalves
In September, 2013, Mr. Gonsalves applied for a Building Permit to construct a residence, garage and covered deck on property at 10550 Seigler Springs North Road. To date, the permit has not been issued due to the fact that this construction is subject to the Traffic Mitigation Fee, and the fee of $1,794.80 has not been paid.
Mr. Gonsalves has recently been represented by a Mr. Richard Adams, and he has been questioning staff about the fee. According to Mr. Adams, when Mr. Gonsalves purchased the property in October, 2008, there was an active building permit that was obtained by the previous Owner in April, 2006. A septic system, well installation, and the foundation had been constructed under that original permit; however construction ceased due to the passing of the previous Owner. This original permit was issued prior to the adoption of Ordinance 2842, and therefor was not subject to the Traffic Mitigation Fee. No additional work was performed on the residence, and the original permit expired in May, 2012. No additional building activity occurred until Mr. Gonsalves applied for a new building permit in September, 2013.
After a discussion with Mr. Adams, he expressed that because the original permit was not subject to the fee, and Mr. Gonsalves is simply renewing the expired permit, he should be exempt from the new fee. In response to that argument, staff offers the following:
* No action was taken by Mr. Gonsalves on the original permit, and it expired in May, 2012;
* Mr. Gonsalves purchased the property and submitted a building permit application for a new residence subsequent to the adoption of Ordinance 2842;
* Even though the new residence is going to utilize the existing foundation that was constructed with the old permit, the new structure is subject to the current fee structure, building construction standards and health and safety requirements - all of which have changed in some form or another since 2006;
* The proposed construction does not meet any of the exemptions allowed by the original and amended Ordinances; therefore the construction is subject to the Traffic Mitigation Fee;
Recommendation
Only the Board of Supervisors can waive the Construction Traffic Mitigation fees under these circumstances. During your consideration, the Department of Public Works would respectfully remind the Board that we have collected approximately $631,500 since the fee was imposed in 2007. While individual amounts are not significant, cumulatively they provide a source of revenue that the Department wouldn't ordinarily have. The Department recently expended $350,000 of the amount referenced above during the summer of 2013 on a pavement rehabilitation project.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Only the Board of Supervisors can waive the Construction Traffic Mitigation fees under these circumstances. During your consideration, the Department of Public Works would respectfully remind the Board that we have collected approximately $631,500 since the fee was imposed in 2007. While individual amounts are not significant, cumulatively they provide a source of revenue that the Department wouldn't ordinarily have. The Department recently expended $350,000 of the amount referenced above during the summer of 2013 on a pavement rehabilitation project.
On motion of Supervisor Brown, and by vote of the Board, waived the Construction Traffic Mitigation Fees by 50%. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Public Works Director Scott De Leon presented the item to the Board.
Joe Gonsalves and Richard Adams were also present. Community Development Director Richard Coel also spoke.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak and Joan Moss spoke. No one else present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9. Non-Timed Items
9.1Supervisors’ weekly calendar, travel and reports
9.2Consideration of Rural County Representatives of California Wildfire Strategy and Resolution advocating for adequate federal funding and commitment to wildfire prevention.
Resolution
Adopted — Pass
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Wildfire Strategy Resolution was first introduced in August 2014, at the Board of Directors meeting of the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC). Currently 18 of RCRC's 34 member counties have passed this resolution. RCRC has requested that the County of Lake pass this resolution in support of efforts to launch a refocused wildfire advocacy strategy to key policy and decision makers in California.
The RCRC 2014-15 Wildfire Strategy outlines a proactive outreach effort to communicate and demonstrate the multi-level issues associated with current forest management practices, and foster a cultural or, if needed, structural shift within the United States Forest Service (USFS) and other state and federal agencies in order to better manage California's forests and wildlands.
With this plan, RCRC endeavors to ease statutory, regulatory, and legal barriers to fire-prevention project completion, and create innovative new approaches to increasing the pace and scale of vegetation management and forest restoration in California.
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends your Board adopt the resolution advocating for increased wildfire prevention funding and focus.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Jill Ruzicka, Sr. Administrative Analyst
DATE: February 3, 2015
SUBJECT: Consideration of Rural County Representatives of California Wildfire Strategy and Resolution advocating for adequate federal funding and commitment to wildfire prevention.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Wildfire Strategy Resolution was first introduced in August 2014, at the Board of Directors meeting of the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC). Currently 18 of RCRC's 34 member counties have passed this resolution. RCRC has requested that the County of Lake pass this resolution in support of efforts to launch a refocused wildfire advocacy strategy to key policy and decision makers in California.
The RCRC 2014-15 Wildfire Strategy outlines a proactive outreach effort to communicate and demonstrate the multi-level issues associated with current forest management practices, and foster a cultural or, if needed, structural shift within the United States Forest Service (USFS) and other state and federal agencies in order to better manage California's forests and wildlands.
With this plan, RCRC endeavors to ease statutory, regulatory, and legal barriers to fire-prevention project completion, and create innovative new approaches to increasing the pace and scale of vegetation management and forest restoration in California.
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends your Board adopt the resolution advocating for increased wildfire prevention funding and focus.
There was Board consensus on the Wildfire Strategy that had been presented.
The Board directed staff to draft an additional letter to RCRC regarding salvage logging.
Supervisor Brown offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: Senior Administrative Analyst Jill Ruzicka presented the item to the Board.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.3Consideration of appointment to the Lower Lake Waterworks District One Board of Directors
Appointment
Adopted — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Comstock (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Lower Lake Waterworks District One Board of Directors - One (1) Vacancy
Application Received: Frances Ransley - incumbent
FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Sara Shucart, Assistant Clerk of the Board
DATE: January 26, 2015
SUBJECT: Consideration of Advisory Board appointment
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Lower Lake Waterworks District One Board of Directors - One (1) Vacancy
Application Received: Frances Ransley - incumbent
FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, appointed Frances Ransley - incumbent to the Lower Lake Waterworks District One Board of Directors. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Supervisor Comstock presented the item to the Board.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak on this item. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.4Consideration of Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2014-112 Establishing Position Allocations for Fiscal Year 2014-2015, Budget Unit No. 1341, Human Resources.
Action Item
Adopted — Pass
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff submits for your Board's consideration and approval the attached resolution to amend the position allocations for Budget Unit 1341 - Human Resources. Staff is requesting to delete one (1) vacant Office Assistant I/II - Confidential allocation, delete one (1) Human Resources Technician allocation, and add two Human Resources Technician I/II allocations. In addition, staff is requesting your approval to add the classifications of Human Resources Technician I/II to County service and reclassify the current Human Resources Technician to a Human Resources Technician II (there is no change in salary tied to this reclassification). The Classification and Compensation Committee has reviewed, and recommends approval of this request.
The Human Resources Technician I/II flex series would establish a:
a. HR Technician I at grade A14 (lower than current)
b. HR Technician II at grade A16 (same as current)
With the advent of pension reform and healthcare reform regulations, and a high volume of recruitments, the burden on the HR Department to ensure that the County is responsive and compliant to numerous additional requirements is growing. As a result, the HR Department needs to have the ability to delegate additional analytical tasks and/or functions to our front desk position which we currently cannot do within the existing classification structure. Establishing the Human Resources Technician I/II position and changing the Office Assistant I/II - Confidential allocation to a Human Resources Technician I/II allocation will also provide the department the flexibility to cross-train staff to ensure that certain key functions of the department, such as recruitments, are not delayed when staff members are out of the office.
The reclassification of the existing Human Resources Technician position is cost neutral, and the cost of the new Human Resources Technician I/II allocation for the remainder of the current fiscal year can be covered with money that is currently budgeted to the Human Resources Department.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff requests your Board's approval of this resolution and authorization of the Chair to sign this resolution.
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Board of Supervisors
FROM: Kathy Ferguson, Human Resources Director
DATE: February 3, 2015
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2014-112 Establishing Position Allocations for FY 2014-15, Budget Unit 1341
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff submits for your Board's consideration and approval the attached resolution to amend the position allocations for Budget Unit 1341 - Human Resources. Staff is requesting to delete one (1) vacant Office Assistant I/II - Confidential allocation, delete one (1) Human Resources Technician allocation, and add two Human Resources Technician I/II allocations. In addition, staff is requesting your approval to add the classifications of Human Resources Technician I/II to County service and reclassify the current Human Resources Technician to a Human Resources Technician II (there is no change in salary tied to this reclassification). The Classification and Compensation Committee has reviewed, and recommends approval of this request.
The Human Resources Technician I/II flex series would establish a:
a. HR Technician I at grade A14 (lower than current)
b. HR Technician II at grade A16 (same as current)
With the advent of pension reform and healthcare reform regulations, and a high volume of recruitments, the burden on the HR Department to ensure that the County is responsive and compliant to numerous additional requirements is growing. As a result, the HR Department needs to have the ability to delegate additional analytical tasks and/or functions to our front desk position which we currently cannot do within the existing classification structure. Establishing the Human Resources Technician I/II position and changing the Office Assistant I/II - Confidential allocation to a Human Resources Technician I/II allocation will also provide the department the flexibility to cross-train staff to ensure that certain key functions of the department, such as recruitments, are not delayed when staff members are out of the office.
The reclassification of the existing Human Resources Technician position is cost neutral, and the cost of the new Human Resources Technician I/II allocation for the remainder of the current fiscal year can be covered with money that is currently budgeted to the Human Resources Department.
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost:
Amount Budgeted:
Additional Requested:
Annual Cost (if planned for future years):
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff requests your Board's approval of this resolution and authorization of the Chair to sign this resolution.
Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: Human Resources Director Kathy Ferguson presented the item to the Board.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.5Consideration of Contract between the County of Lake and Redwoods Children’s Services, Inc., for Family Wraparound Service from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019, entire term amount not to exceed $2,001,000.00, and authorize the Chair to sign.
Action Item
approved — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Comstock (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 23, 2014, your Board approved the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the California Department of Social Services and the County of Lake Departments of Social Services and Probation for the Title IV-E California Well-Being Project. We are now bringing to you the corresponding local contract for Family Wraparound Services.
Family Wraparound Services will be provided to children referred by both the Probation and Social Services Departments. This program is intended to reduce entry into the foster care and probation systems by providing intervention services to at risk children and families previously ineligible.
These services are now all eligible for Federal Financial Participation paid for by Title IV-E funds though the California Well Being Project.
The term of this contract commences January 1, 2015 and runs through June 30, 2019. Redwood Children's Services will serve 12 families in the first year, increasing over time, up to 60 families in the final year. The maximum compensation from the entire term shall not exceed two million one thousand dollars ($2,001,000.00).
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None X Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $127,000 for year one
Amount Budgeted: $127,000
Additional Requested: none
Annual Cost (if planned for future years): $392,000 for second year and
$494,000 for remaining years.
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
Federal funds will pay for fifty percent (50%) of all costs. The remaining portion will be funded completely by Realignment 1991 and Realignment 2011, resulting in no County cost.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
None
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the Contract between the County of Lake and Redwood Children's Services, Inc. for Family Wraparound Services, authorizing the Chair to sign.
Thank you for your consideration.
CC: Kathy Maes, Deputy SS Director
Leila Haddad, Supervising SSA
Original memo text
..Title
..Body
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Carol J. Huchingson, Social Services Director
DATE: January 21, 2015
SUBJECT: Contract Between the County of Lake and Redwoods Children's Services, Inc.,
for Family Wraparound Service
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On September 23, 2014, your Board approved the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the California Department of Social Services and the County of Lake Departments of Social Services and Probation for the Title IV-E California Well-Being Project. We are now bringing to you the corresponding local contract for Family Wraparound Services.
Family Wraparound Services will be provided to children referred by both the Probation and Social Services Departments. This program is intended to reduce entry into the foster care and probation systems by providing intervention services to at risk children and families previously ineligible.
These services are now all eligible for Federal Financial Participation paid for by Title IV-E funds though the California Well Being Project.
The term of this contract commences January 1, 2015 and runs through June 30, 2019. Redwood Children's Services will serve 12 families in the first year, increasing over time, up to 60 families in the final year. The maximum compensation from the entire term shall not exceed two million one thousand dollars ($2,001,000.00).
FISCAL IMPACT: __ None X Budgeted __Non-Budgeted
Estimated Cost: $127,000 for year one
Amount Budgeted: $127,000
Additional Requested: none
Annual Cost (if planned for future years): $392,000 for second year and
$494,000 for remaining years.
FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative):
Federal funds will pay for fifty percent (50%) of all costs. The remaining portion will be funded completely by Realignment 1991 and Realignment 2011, resulting in no County cost.
STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable):
None
..Recommended Action
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the Contract between the County of Lake and Redwood Children's Services, Inc. for Family Wraparound Services, authorizing the Chair to sign.
Thank you for your consideration.
CC: Kathy Maes, Deputy SS Director
Leila Haddad, Supervising SSA
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, approved the Agreement. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Social Services Director Carol Huchingson and Child Welfare Services Deputy Director Kathy Maes presented the item to the Board.
Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
10. Closed Session
10.1Conference with Labor Negotiator: (a) County Negotiators: A. Grant, S. Harry, M. Perry and C. Shaver; and (b) Employee Organizations: DDAA, DSA, LCCOA, LCEA and LCSEA
10.2Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(1): Gleason v. Bowen.
Closed Session Item
10.3Public Employee Performance Evaluations
Title: Registrar of Voters
Title: Agricultural Commissioner
Closed Session Item
Clerk’s notes: The Board reconvened into Regular Session at 11:19.m. having taken no action.