Lake County Meetings — interactive archive

Board Of Supervisors — Tuesday, July 21, 2015

9:00 AM · Board Chambers

Approved minutes (PDF)

1. Call to Order

2. Moment of Silence

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Presentation of Animals at the Animal Care and Control Shelter

5. Consideration of Items Not Appearing on the Posted Agenda (Extra Items)

5.1Extra Agenda Item Requesting Appropriation of 2016 Ford Truck Action Item
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: July 20, 2015 · To: The Honorable Members of the Lake County Board of Supervisors · From: Caroline Chavez, Director of Public Services · Subject: Extra Agenda Item - Requesting Appropriation for 2016 Ford Truck

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I respectfully request that you place on your July 21, 2015, Board of Supervisor's Agenda an item to appropriate the funds that were already approved and allocated in the 14/15 budget to purchase a 2016 Ford truck for the Solid Waste Division. The justification for considering an item not on the posted agenda is as follows: The need to take action came to the attention of this department subsequent to the posting of the current agenda: On July 20, 2015, staff was alerted that the amount for the truck was not carried over when preparing the budget in March, There was no reason to believe that it would not be delivered by 14/15 years end, but it was not and we overlooked the need to carry the appropriation forward. We are asking for approval of this appropriation as the purchase order was issued to Ukiah Ford in the amount of $31,181.72. There is a need to take immediate action before the next available agenda. It is necessary to take action on this item before the next available agenda as the purchase order was already submitted to Ukiah Ford for the purchase of a 2016 Ford truck for the Solid Waste Division which is on the lot and ready. The cost is not a problem for the Solid Waste Budget but does require approval from your Board.

Background

A 2015 Dodge truck was approved by your Board of Supervisors and then ordered from Dodge on December 3, 2014, after 7 months of promises to deliver Dodge stated they would be unable to fulfill the County's order until 2016 and at that point the price of the truck would go up at that point. After doing some research we were able to find a 2016 Ford truck which is equivalently equipped and just $4600.00 more than originally requested. The cost through Ukiah Ford is under what it would have been to wait for Dodge to build and deliver. The order from Dodge was canceled. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted _x_Non-Budgeted Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None RECOMMENDED ACTION: We are asking for approval to appropriate funds to fulfill a purchase order agreement to Ukiah Ford in the amount of $ 31,181.72. Thank you for your time and cooperation in addressing this matter, and I remain available to answer any questions which you may have concerning the topic of this memorandum.

No additional funding requested — the memo's cost fields were left blank, which on this form means the item is already budgeted.

Original memo text
MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Members of the Lake County Board of Supervisors FROM: Caroline Chavez, Director of Public Services DATE: July 20, 2015 SUBJECT: Extra Agenda Item - Requesting Appropriation for 2016 Ford Truck EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I respectfully request that you place on your July 21, 2015, Board of Supervisor's Agenda an item to appropriate the funds that were already approved and allocated in the 14/15 budget to purchase a 2016 Ford truck for the Solid Waste Division. The justification for considering an item not on the posted agenda is as follows: The need to take action came to the attention of this department subsequent to the posting of the current agenda: On July 20, 2015, staff was alerted that the amount for the truck was not carried over when preparing the budget in March, There was no reason to believe that it would not be delivered by 14/15 years end, but it was not and we overlooked the need to carry the appropriation forward. We are asking for approval of this appropriation as the purchase order was issued to Ukiah Ford in the amount of $31,181.72. There is a need to take immediate action before the next available agenda. It is necessary to take action on this item before the next available agenda as the purchase order was already submitted to Ukiah Ford for the purchase of a 2016 Ford truck for the Solid Waste Division which is on the lot and ready. The cost is not a problem for the Solid Waste Budget but does require approval from your Board. Background: A 2015 Dodge truck was approved by your Board of Supervisors and then ordered from Dodge on December 3, 2014, after 7 months of promises to deliver Dodge stated they would be unable to fulfill the County's order until 2016 and at that point the price of the truck would go up at that point. After doing some research we were able to find a 2016 Ford truck which is equivalently equipped and just $4600.00 more than originally requested. The cost through Ukiah Ford is under what it would have been to wait for Dodge to build and deliver. The order from Dodge was canceled. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted _x_Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $31,181.72 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None RECOMMENDED ACTION: We are asking for approval to appropriate funds to fulfill a purchase order agreement to Ukiah Ford in the amount of $ 31,181.72. Thank you for your time and cooperation in addressing this matter, and I remain available to answer any questions which you may have concerning the topic of this memorandum.
The Board did not find reasonable justification to consider this item. It will be placed on the July 28, 2015 agenda for consideration.
Clerk’s notes: Caroline Chavez presented the item to the Board.

6. Current Construction Projects - Contract Change Orders

6.1Approval of Change Order No. Three for Soda Bay Road at Cole Creek Bridge Replacement Project, Federal Project No. BRLS-5914(025), Bid No. 13-31, and authorization for Chair to sign. Action Item approved — Pass
Carried 3-0 — moved by Smith (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: abstain Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 21, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director · Subject: Approval of Change Order No. Three for Soda Bay Road at Cole Creek Bridge Replacement Project, Federal Project No. BRLS-5914(025), Bid No. 13-31, and authorization for Chair to sign.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached for the Board's review and approval is Contract Change Order (CCO) No. Three for the subject project. CCO No. Three addresses the need to upgrade the Metal Beam Guardrail to current standards. Standards for Metal Beam Guardrail have been updated since preparation of project plans. This change order updates the guardrail to the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) with a Transition Railing Type WB-31 and Type SRT-31 Terminal System and updates the applicable Special Provisions, Standards Plans, and Project Plan Sheets. This project is fully funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funding and state Surface Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding. Therefore, this project is 100% federally and state funded through construction. Staff recommends approval by the Board of Supervisors of Contract Change Order No. Three and that the Board authorizes the Chair to execute CCO No. Three for an increase of $2,386.22 and a revised contract amount of $1,206,381.07 FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: 2,386.22 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): This project is fully funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funding and state Surface Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding. Therefore, this project is 100% federally and state funded through construction. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval by the Board of Supervisors of Contract Change Order No. Three and that the Board authorizes the Chair to execute CCO No. Three for an increase of $2,386.22 and a revised contract amount of $1,206,381.07
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director DATE: July 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Change Order No. Three for Soda Bay Road at Cole Creek Bridge Replacement Project, Federal Project No. BRLS-5914(025), Bid No. 13-31, and authorization for Chair to sign. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached for the Board's review and approval is Contract Change Order (CCO) No. Three for the subject project. CCO No. Three addresses the need to upgrade the Metal Beam Guardrail to current standards. Standards for Metal Beam Guardrail have been updated since preparation of project plans. This change order updates the guardrail to the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) with a Transition Railing Type WB-31 and Type SRT-31 Terminal System and updates the applicable Special Provisions, Standards Plans, and Project Plan Sheets. This project is fully funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funding and state Surface Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding. Therefore, this project is 100% federally and state funded through construction. Staff recommends approval by the Board of Supervisors of Contract Change Order No. Three and that the Board authorizes the Chair to execute CCO No. Three for an increase of $2,386.22 and a revised contract amount of $1,206,381.07 FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: 2,386.22 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): This project is fully funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funding and state Surface Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) funding. Therefore, this project is 100% federally and state funded through construction. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval by the Board of Supervisors of Contract Change Order No. Three and that the Board authorizes the Chair to execute CCO No. Three for an increase of $2,386.22 and a revised contract amount of $1,206,381.07
On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved Change Order No. Three for Soda Bay Road at Cole Creek Bridge Replacement Project, Federal Project No. BRLS-5914(025), Bid No. 13-31, an increase of $2,386.22 and a revised contract amount of $1,206,381.07 and authorized the Chair to sign. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Chair Farrington recused himself from the item and passed the gavel to Vice Chair Brown. Public Works Director Scott DeLeon presented the item to the Board. Vice Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
6.2Approval of Change Order No. One for 2015 Countywide Chip Seal Screenings and Authorization for the Chair to Sign. Action Item approved — Pass
Carried 4-0 — moved by Smith (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 17, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director · Subject: Approval of Change Order No. One for 2015 Countywide Chip Seal Screenings and Authorization for the Chair to Sign.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached for the Board's review and approval is Contract Change Order (CCO) No. One for the subject project. CCO No. One addresses the need to revise (3) three contract items by adding freight charges to each contact item due to the unavailability of County owned trucks and manpower. CCO No. One also increases the quantity of (1) one contact item. This project is fully funded by local gas tax funds. Therefore, this project is 100% funded. Staff recommends approval by the Board of Supervisors of Contract Change Order No. One and that the Board authorizes the Chair to execute CCO No. One for an increase of $15,526.00 and a revised contract amount of $165,555.50. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $15,526.00 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval by the Board of Supervisors of Contract Change Order No. One and that the Board authorizes the Chair to execute CCO No. One for an increase of $15,526.00 and a revised contract amount of $165,555.50.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director DATE: July 17, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of Change Order No. One for 2015 Countywide Chip Seal Screenings and Authorization for the Chair to Sign. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached for the Board's review and approval is Contract Change Order (CCO) No. One for the subject project. CCO No. One addresses the need to revise (3) three contract items by adding freight charges to each contact item due to the unavailability of County owned trucks and manpower. CCO No. One also increases the quantity of (1) one contact item. This project is fully funded by local gas tax funds. Therefore, this project is 100% funded. Staff recommends approval by the Board of Supervisors of Contract Change Order No. One and that the Board authorizes the Chair to execute CCO No. One for an increase of $15,526.00 and a revised contract amount of $165,555.50. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $15,526.00 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval by the Board of Supervisors of Contract Change Order No. One and that the Board authorizes the Chair to execute CCO No. One for an increase of $15,526.00 and a revised contract amount of $165,555.50.
On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved Change Order No. One for 2015 Countywide Chip Seal Screenings, an increase of $15,526.00 and a revised contract amount of $165,555.50 and authorized the Chair to sign. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Public Works Director Scott DeLeon presented the item to the Board. Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.

7. Approval of the Consent Agenda

7.1Approve Agreement between the County of Lake and the Highlands Senior Service Center, Inc. to provide funding to purchase kitchen equipment for the Highlands Senior Service Center, in the amount of $11,900 and authorize the Chair to sign. Agreement passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: July 21, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Matt Perry, County Administrative Officer · Subject: Approve Agreement with Highland Senior Service Center, Inc.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As your Board may recall, at the request of Supervisor Smith, the FY 14-15 Adopted Budget included $11,900 to provide funding to the Highlands Senior Service Center to replace kitchen equipment. This money has been carried over and included in the FY 15/16 approved budget. I have recently been contacted by the Senior Center Executive Director and they have recently purchased two ovens. Approval of the attached agreement is necessary to reimburse the Senior Center for these expenditures. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board approve the attached agreement Highland Senior Service Center, Inc. and authorize the Chair to sign.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Matt Perry, County Administrative Officer DATE: July 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with Highland Senior Service Center, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As your Board may recall, at the request of Supervisor Smith, the FY 14-15 Adopted Budget included $11,900 to provide funding to the Highlands Senior Service Center to replace kitchen equipment. This money has been carried over and included in the FY 15/16 approved budget. I have recently been contacted by the Senior Center Executive Director and they have recently purchased two ovens. Approval of the attached agreement is necessary to reimburse the Senior Center for these expenditures. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board approve the attached agreement Highland Senior Service Center, Inc. and authorize the Chair to sign.
7.2Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20 - 26, 2015 as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA. Proclamation passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: July 21, 2015 · To: The Honorable Board of Supervisors · From: Steve Hajik, Agricultural Commissioner and Sealer of Weights and Measures · Subject: Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20th - July 26th as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The week of July 20th - July 26th is designated as California Invasive Weed Awareness Week. The purpose of this week is to inform the public of noxious, invasive weeds that exist in Lake County. Our department will be conducting the 12th Annual Weed Tour on July 23rd from 9am to 12pm at Anderson Marsh State Park in Lower Lake. The tour will be in and around Anderson Marsh State Park, concluding with lunch and beverages. For more information, please contact us at 263-0217. FISCAL IMPACT: __x None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: none Amount Budgeted: none Additional Requested: none Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20th - July 26th as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Board of Supervisors FROM: Steve Hajik, Agricultural Commissioner and Sealer of Weights and Measures DATE: July 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20th - July 26th as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The week of July 20th - July 26th is designated as California Invasive Weed Awareness Week. The purpose of this week is to inform the public of noxious, invasive weeds that exist in Lake County. Our department will be conducting the 12th Annual Weed Tour on July 23rd from 9am to 12pm at Anderson Marsh State Park in Lower Lake. The tour will be in and around Anderson Marsh State Park, concluding with lunch and beverages. For more information, please contact us at 263-0217. FISCAL IMPACT: __x None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: none Amount Budgeted: none Additional Requested: none Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20th - July 26th as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA
7.3Approve Amendment Number Three to the Memorandum of Understanding By and Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Employees’ Association, Units 3, 4 and 5 for the period from July 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016, and authorize the Chair to sign. Action Item passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: July 21, 2015 · To: The Honorable Board of Supervisors · From: Shanda Harry, Deputy County Counsel Jennifer DeHaan - Deputy County Administrative Officer Sarah Jansen - Deputy Human Resources Director · Subject: Approve Amendment Number Three to the Memorandum of Understanding By and Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Employees' Association, Units 3, 4 and 5 for the period from July 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As you may recall on February 17, 2015, your Board approved the Memorandum of Understanding with the Lake County Employee's Association (LCEA) for Units 3, 4, 5 for the calendar period from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. During the MOU negotiation period it was agreed that the issues surrounding "stand-by" pay would be reviewed. During April, May and June of 2015 representatives from the County met with the LCEA and came to the following agreement: 1) Stand-By Pay would be increased to fifty (50) dollars on weekdays and seventy-five (75) dollars on weekends and holidays from the current rate of twenty (20) dollars on weekdays and twenty-five (25) dollars on weekends and holidays. Therefore, presented for approval by your Board is the Third Amendment to the MOU's to include the above referenced change for Units 3, 4, and 5. The specific changes resulting in the amendment to the current MOU's are listed below: 1. That Article III (D) (3), STANDBY PAY, is amended in the MOUs for Units 3, 4 and 5 to read as follows: 3. STANDBY PAY The COUNTY shall pay fifty ($50.00) dollars per day for each daily assignment and seventy-five ($75.00) per day for each weekend or holiday assignment. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the Board approve the proposed amendment and authorize the Chair to sign
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Board of Supervisors FROM: Shanda Harry, Deputy County Counsel Jennifer DeHaan - Deputy County Administrative Officer Sarah Jansen - Deputy Human Resources Director DATE: July 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve Amendment Number Three to the Memorandum of Understanding By and Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Employees' Association, Units 3, 4 and 5 for the period from July 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As you may recall on February 17, 2015, your Board approved the Memorandum of Understanding with the Lake County Employee's Association (LCEA) for Units 3, 4, 5 for the calendar period from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. During the MOU negotiation period it was agreed that the issues surrounding "stand-by" pay would be reviewed. During April, May and June of 2015 representatives from the County met with the LCEA and came to the following agreement: 1) Stand-By Pay would be increased to fifty (50) dollars on weekdays and seventy-five (75) dollars on weekends and holidays from the current rate of twenty (20) dollars on weekdays and twenty-five (25) dollars on weekends and holidays. Therefore, presented for approval by your Board is the Third Amendment to the MOU's to include the above referenced change for Units 3, 4, and 5. The specific changes resulting in the amendment to the current MOU's are listed below: 1. That Article III (D) (3), STANDBY PAY, is amended in the MOUs for Units 3, 4 and 5 to read as follows: 3. STANDBY PAY The COUNTY shall pay fifty ($50.00) dollars per day for each daily assignment and seventy-five ($75.00) per day for each weekend or holiday assignment. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the Board approve the proposed amendment and authorize the Chair to sign Attachments
7.4Adopt Resolution to ratify the execution of a Grant Agreement by the District Attorney for the Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driver Vertical Prosecution Program. Resolution passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: July 8, 2015 · To: The Honorable Members of the Lake County Board of Supervisors · From: Don A. Anderson, District Attorney · Subject: Adopt Resolution Authorizing District Attorney to Execute Agreement for Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driver Vertical Prosecution Program Grant Funds

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In FY 2014/2015, the Office of the Lake County District Attorney (LCDA) received a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to fund a Vertical Prosecution Program that enhances the prosecution of DUI alcohol and/or drug offenders. In January 2015, the LCDA received a notification that the grant would be extended for another year beginning October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016 in the amount of $234,038 and that no new application would be required to be submitted. However, OTS recently requested the Grant Agreement be signed and executed by July 17, which is prior to the next Board Meeting. To ensure the County would continue to be eligible for funding, the CAO authorized the District Attorney to execute the Grant Agreement to meet the OTS deadline and staff is now requesting that the Board ratify the submittal of the Grant Agreement by authorizing the Lake County District Attorney to execute the Agreement. Attached is a Resolution to ratify the submission and execution of the Grant Agreement by the Lake County District Attorney for the OTS program. The executed Grant Agreement is attached. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): This grant will fund two full time employees of the District Attorney's Office: a Deputy District Attorney and a DA Investigator. Additionally, the grant-specific training that the DDA and DAI are required to attend is also reimbursable by the grant. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution Approving the Grant Project - Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driver Vertical Prosecution Program
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Members of the Lake County Board of Supervisors FROM: Don A. Anderson, District Attorney DATE: July 8, 2015 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Authorizing District Attorney to Execute Agreement for Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driver Vertical Prosecution Program Grant Funds EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In FY 2014/2015, the Office of the Lake County District Attorney (LCDA) received a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to fund a Vertical Prosecution Program that enhances the prosecution of DUI alcohol and/or drug offenders. In January 2015, the LCDA received a notification that the grant would be extended for another year beginning October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016 in the amount of $234,038 and that no new application would be required to be submitted. However, OTS recently requested the Grant Agreement be signed and executed by July 17, which is prior to the next Board Meeting. To ensure the County would continue to be eligible for funding, the CAO authorized the District Attorney to execute the Grant Agreement to meet the OTS deadline and staff is now requesting that the Board ratify the submittal of the Grant Agreement by authorizing the Lake County District Attorney to execute the Agreement. Attached is a Resolution to ratify the submission and execution of the Grant Agreement by the Lake County District Attorney for the OTS program. The executed Grant Agreement is attached. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): This grant will fund two full time employees of the District Attorney's Office: a Deputy District Attorney and a DA Investigator. Additionally, the grant-specific training that the DDA and DAI are required to attend is also reimbursable by the grant. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution Approving the Grant Project - Alcohol and Drug Impaired Driver Vertical Prosecution Program
7.5(a) Approve waiver of consultant selection process due to lack of economic benefit to the County; and (b) Approve Construction Inspection Services Agreement between the County of Lake and RGH Consultants for CSA 16 Paradise Valley Water Intertie Pipeline with Clearlake Oaks County Water District, in the amount of $36, 280, and authorize the Chair to sign. Agreement passed on consent approved — Pass
Carried 4-0 — moved by Smith (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 7, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors on Behalf of CSA 16 Paradise Valley Water System · From: Mark Dellinger, Administrator and Jan Coppinger, Compliance Coordinator · Subject: Intertie Pipeline with Clearlake Oaks County Water District - Construction Inspection Services Agreement with RGH Consultants

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Background On May 19, 2015, your Board approved the funding agreement for the construction of these facilities. In the interim, we have been waiting for Caltrans approval of archeological documentation so the encroachment permit can be issued. The delay has created a very short time frame in which to construct the project while meeting all of Caltrans' schedule requirements. Given these limitations, we have to retain the services of a professional firm to perform the important task of construction inspection. Agreement with RGH Consultants Due to the strict time limitations imposed on the project, following the consultant selection process was not viable. We canvassed several local people having the needed experience but none are currently available. Also, we obtained informal cost proposals from three engineering firms (Veizades Associates, CH2M Hill, RGH Consultants). RGH is considered the best suited to perform the work for several reasons. 1) They have local experience in Lake County that includes construction inspection, geotechnical investigations, and materials testing within Highway 20. 2) They can mobilize staff quickly from within the County. Two of the three staff assigned to this project reside in Lake County. This reduces response time and travel costs. 3) The RGH proposal was the lowest hourly rate and daily travel time costs. The total cost of this work is $35,280. This is based on the negotiated hourly rate and the estimated construction time of 45 working days. The funding for these construction inspection services is available through the Department of Water Resources (DWR) Emergency Drought Grant previously approved by your Board. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $35,280 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): None, paid by DWR grant. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff is requesting that your Board take the following action: 1. Make a determination that the competitive consultant selection process would produce no economic benefit to the County and waive the consultant selection process, and 2. Approve consultant agreement with RGH Consultants for inspection services for construction of an 8 inch intertie pipeline in the amount of $36,280 and authorize the Chair to sign. Questions regarding this matter should be addressed to Mark Dellinger or Jan Coppinger.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors on Behalf of CSA 16 Paradise Valley Water System FROM: Mark Dellinger, Administrator and Jan Coppinger, Compliance Coordinator DATE: July 7, 2015 SUBJECT: Intertie Pipeline with Clearlake Oaks County Water District - Construction Inspection Services Agreement with RGH Consultants EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Background On May 19, 2015, your Board approved the funding agreement for the construction of these facilities. In the interim, we have been waiting for Caltrans approval of archeological documentation so the encroachment permit can be issued. The delay has created a very short time frame in which to construct the project while meeting all of Caltrans' schedule requirements. Given these limitations, we have to retain the services of a professional firm to perform the important task of construction inspection. Agreement with RGH Consultants Due to the strict time limitations imposed on the project, following the consultant selection process was not viable. We canvassed several local people having the needed experience but none are currently available. Also, we obtained informal cost proposals from three engineering firms (Veizades Associates, CH2M Hill, RGH Consultants). RGH is considered the best suited to perform the work for several reasons. 1) They have local experience in Lake County that includes construction inspection, geotechnical investigations, and materials testing within Highway 20. 2) They can mobilize staff quickly from within the County. Two of the three staff assigned to this project reside in Lake County. This reduces response time and travel costs. 3) The RGH proposal was the lowest hourly rate and daily travel time costs. The total cost of this work is $35,280. This is based on the negotiated hourly rate and the estimated construction time of 45 working days. The funding for these construction inspection services is available through the Department of Water Resources (DWR) Emergency Drought Grant previously approved by your Board. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $35,280 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): None, paid by DWR grant. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff is requesting that your Board take the following action: 1. Make a determination that the competitive consultant selection process would produce no economic benefit to the County and waive the consultant selection process, and 2. Approve consultant agreement with RGH Consultants for inspection services for construction of an 8 inch intertie pipeline in the amount of $36,280 and authorize the Chair to sign. Questions regarding this matter should be addressed to Mark Dellinger or Jan Coppinger.
On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved Consent Agenda Items 7.1 through 7.5. The motion carried by the following vote:

8. Timed Items

8.19:05 A.M. - Public Input not acted on
no itemized roll call in the official record
This was not acted on
Clerk’s notes: Larry Anderson spoke regarding Land Record Audit
8.29:10 A.M. - Presentation of Proclamation Designating the week of July 20 - 26, 2015 as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA. Proclamation
Staff memo

Date: July 21, 2015 · To: The Honorable Board of Supervisors · From: Steve Hajik, Agricultural Commissioner and Sealer of Weights and Measures · Subject: Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20th - July 26th as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The week of July 20th - July 26th is designated as California Invasive Weed Awareness Week. The purpose of this week is to inform the public of noxious, invasive weeds that exist in Lake County. Our department will be conducting the 12th Annual Weed Tour on July 23rd from 9am to 12pm at Anderson Marsh State Park in Lower Lake. The tour will be in and around Anderson Marsh State Park, concluding with lunch and beverages. For more information, please contact us at 263-0217. FISCAL IMPACT: __x None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: none Amount Budgeted: none Additional Requested: none Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20th - July 26th as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Board of Supervisors FROM: Steve Hajik, Agricultural Commissioner and Sealer of Weights and Measures DATE: July 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20th - July 26th as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The week of July 20th - July 26th is designated as California Invasive Weed Awareness Week. The purpose of this week is to inform the public of noxious, invasive weeds that exist in Lake County. Our department will be conducting the 12th Annual Weed Tour on July 23rd from 9am to 12pm at Anderson Marsh State Park in Lower Lake. The tour will be in and around Anderson Marsh State Park, concluding with lunch and beverages. For more information, please contact us at 263-0217. FISCAL IMPACT: __x None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: none Amount Budgeted: none Additional Requested: none Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Proclamation Designating the week of July 20th - July 26th as Invasive Weed Awareness Week in Lake County, CA
Clerk’s notes: Supervisor Steele read the proclamation into the record and presented it to Agricultural Commissioner Steve Hajik.
8.39:15 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of Appeal(s) of an Administrative Citation for Violating Quagga Mussel Prevention Program:(a) Richard Jones; (b) Jose Zapeda; and (c) Jason Buckley Public Hearing Motion carried · 3 motions
Carried 3-1 — moved by Steele
Brown: nay Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 3-0 — moved by Brown
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: abstain
Carried 4-0 — moved by Brown
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 21, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott DeLeon, Water Resources Director · Subject: Consideration of Appeal of an Administrative Citation for (a) Richard Jones; (b) Jose Zapeda; and (c) Jason Buckley

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On June 19th 2012, your Board enacted Ordinance 2976 which established the Administrative Citation process for boaters found in violation of the County's Quagga Mussel Prevention Program. Under this ordinance, the enforcement officers have the option of citing a violation using an Administrative Citation instead of a Criminal Citation. For a first offense, the fine is $100; however the individual receiving the violation has the option to appeal the fine to your Board and today's item is a hearing for two citation appeals. I have provided a short summary of the cases and I anticipate that the Appellants or a representative will be available to present their argument. (a) Jose Zapeda Mr. Zapeda had apparently loaned his personal watercraft vessel to a relative and it was discovered on the lake without a current Lake County Quagga Mussel sticker by the Sheriff Boat Patrol on May 30, 2015. The operator was cited for violation of County Code 15.63 - Failure to display a current Lake County Quagga Mussel sticker. According to Mr. Zapeda's appeal paperwork, current stickers had been purchased for the craft; however they were not affixed to the hull of the boat prior to its use in the lake. Staff's Argument: The County Sheriff's Department has adopted a no-tolerance policy on violations of the County Quagga Mussel ordinance. The vessel owner was familiar with the requirements of the program and should have been aware that he was responsible for ensuring his vessel had the proper stickers prior to its operation on Clear Lake. Simply possessing the stickers is not sufficient, they need to be attached to the vessel and visible. (b) Richard Jones Mr. Jones was cited by a Lake County Sheriff Boat Patrol officer on June 17, 2015. He was cited for violation of County Code 15.63 - Failure to display a current Lake County Quagga Mussel sticker. According to the incident summary provided by the officer, Mr. Jones and his daughter were observed riding Personal Watercraft in the lake without a current Lake County Quagga Sticker, and upon contact by the officer, Mr. Jones claimed he thought the State of California sticker was sufficient. According to the appeal paperwork, Mr. Jones has purchased County Quagga stickers for these watercraft for the past 3 years, so he was familiar with the local program requirements. Signage at the nearby ramp advised boaters that all vessels must have current stickers and attached is a photograph of one of the signs at the ramp. Staff's Argument: The County Sheriff's Department has adopted a no-tolerance policy on violations of the County Quagga Mussel ordinance. The vessel owner was familiar with the requirements of the program and should have been aware that he was responsible for ensuring his vessel had the proper stickers prior to its operation on Clear Lake. (c) Jason Buckley Mr. Buckley was cited by a Lake County Sheriff Boat Patrol officer on June 27, 2015. He was cited for violation of County Code 15.63 - Failure to display a current Lake County Quagga Mussel sticker. According to the incident summary provided by the officer, the vessel Mr. Buckley was operating had failed to display a ski warning flag and upon contact by the officer, it was observed the boat did not have the required local stickers. Mr. Buckley claimed he was not aware of a local program and did not see any signs at the ramps. According to the appeal paperwork, Mr. Buckley visited Redbud Park the following day and observed several signs in the vicinity of the ramps. Also in his paperwork, he recalls an event with many people at the park - which is presumed to suggest he was distracted while launching his boat. Mr. Buckley also claims that due to the late hour he launched (6:30 pm) the signs were difficult to see due to the darkness - saying that without lights, the signs were "impossible to see or even notice in the evening light", however; Mr. Buckley was cited on the lake while pulling an inflatable tube at 7:35 pm. It should also be noted that sunset was officially at 8:36 pm on June 27, 2015. Staff's Argument: The County Sheriff's Department has adopted a no-tolerance policy on violations of the County Quagga Mussel ordinance. Signage alerting boaters to the Lake County requirements exists on State Highways leading into Lake County, and there were signs posted at the ramp used by the appellant. The owner is responsible for ensuring his vessel had the proper stickers prior to its operation on Clear Lake, and though it's unfortunate the citation tainted their overall experience, all boaters - residents and visitors - are responsible for following the local ordinance. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (a)(b)(c)Only the Board of Supervisors can grant an appeal to the Administrative Citation. Your Board has supported the Sheriff's Department's policy of zero-tolerance on previous citation appeals and staff recommends that you follow your previous decisions.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott DeLeon, Water Resources Director DATE: July 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration of Appeal of an Administrative Citation for (a) Richard Jones; (b) Jose Zapeda; and (c) Jason Buckley EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On June 19th 2012, your Board enacted Ordinance 2976 which established the Administrative Citation process for boaters found in violation of the County's Quagga Mussel Prevention Program. Under this ordinance, the enforcement officers have the option of citing a violation using an Administrative Citation instead of a Criminal Citation. For a first offense, the fine is $100; however the individual receiving the violation has the option to appeal the fine to your Board and today's item is a hearing for two citation appeals. I have provided a short summary of the cases and I anticipate that the Appellants or a representative will be available to present their argument. (a) Jose Zapeda Mr. Zapeda had apparently loaned his personal watercraft vessel to a relative and it was discovered on the lake without a current Lake County Quagga Mussel sticker by the Sheriff Boat Patrol on May 30, 2015. The operator was cited for violation of County Code 15.63 - Failure to display a current Lake County Quagga Mussel sticker. According to Mr. Zapeda's appeal paperwork, current stickers had been purchased for the craft; however they were not affixed to the hull of the boat prior to its use in the lake. Staff's Argument: The County Sheriff's Department has adopted a no-tolerance policy on violations of the County Quagga Mussel ordinance. The vessel owner was familiar with the requirements of the program and should have been aware that he was responsible for ensuring his vessel had the proper stickers prior to its operation on Clear Lake. Simply possessing the stickers is not sufficient, they need to be attached to the vessel and visible. (b) Richard Jones Mr. Jones was cited by a Lake County Sheriff Boat Patrol officer on June 17, 2015. He was cited for violation of County Code 15.63 - Failure to display a current Lake County Quagga Mussel sticker. According to the incident summary provided by the officer, Mr. Jones and his daughter were observed riding Personal Watercraft in the lake without a current Lake County Quagga Sticker, and upon contact by the officer, Mr. Jones claimed he thought the State of California sticker was sufficient. According to the appeal paperwork, Mr. Jones has purchased County Quagga stickers for these watercraft for the past 3 years, so he was familiar with the local program requirements. Signage at the nearby ramp advised boaters that all vessels must have current stickers and attached is a photograph of one of the signs at the ramp. Staff's Argument: The County Sheriff's Department has adopted a no-tolerance policy on violations of the County Quagga Mussel ordinance. The vessel owner was familiar with the requirements of the program and should have been aware that he was responsible for ensuring his vessel had the proper stickers prior to its operation on Clear Lake. (c) Jason Buckley Mr. Buckley was cited by a Lake County Sheriff Boat Patrol officer on June 27, 2015. He was cited for violation of County Code 15.63 - Failure to display a current Lake County Quagga Mussel sticker. According to the incident summary provided by the officer, the vessel Mr. Buckley was operating had failed to display a ski warning flag and upon contact by the officer, it was observed the boat did not have the required local stickers. Mr. Buckley claimed he was not aware of a local program and did not see any signs at the ramps. According to the appeal paperwork, Mr. Buckley visited Redbud Park the following day and observed several signs in the vicinity of the ramps. Also in his paperwork, he recalls an event with many people at the park - which is presumed to suggest he was distracted while launching his boat. Mr. Buckley also claims that due to the late hour he launched (6:30 pm) the signs were difficult to see due to the darkness - saying that without lights, the signs were "impossible to see or even notice in the evening light", however; Mr. Buckley was cited on the lake while pulling an inflatable tube at 7:35 pm. It should also be noted that sunset was officially at 8:36 pm on June 27, 2015. Staff's Argument: The County Sheriff's Department has adopted a no-tolerance policy on violations of the County Quagga Mussel ordinance. Signage alerting boaters to the Lake County requirements exists on State Highways leading into Lake County, and there were signs posted at the ramp used by the appellant. The owner is responsible for ensuring his vessel had the proper stickers prior to its operation on Clear Lake, and though it's unfortunate the citation tainted their overall experience, all boaters - residents and visitors - are responsible for following the local ordinance. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (a)(b)(c)Only the Board of Supervisors can grant an appeal to the Administrative Citation. Your Board has supported the Sheriff's Department's policy of zero-tolerance on previous citation appeals and staff recommends that you follow your previous decisions.
(a) On motion of Supervisor Steele, and by vote of the Board, denied the appeal of Mr. Jones' administrative citation for violating the quagga mussel prevention program. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 3 - Smith, Steele and Farrington Nay- Supervisors: 1 - Brown Absent- Supervisors: 1 - Comstock (b) On motion of Supervisor Brown, and by vote of the Board, approved the appeal of Mr. Zapeda's administrative citation for violating the quagga mussel prevention program. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 3 - Smith, Brown and Farrington Abstain- Supervisors: 1 - Steele Absent- Supervisors: 1 - Comstock (c) On motion of Supervisor Brown, and by vote of the Board, denied the appeal of Mr. Buckley's administrative citation for violating the quagga mussel prevention program. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 4 - Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Supervisors: 1 - Comstock
Clerk’s notes: Clerk swore in Water Resources Director Scott DeLeon and appellants Richard Jones and Jose Zapeda. Jason Buckley, nor representation, was not present. (a) Water Resources Director Scott DeLeon presented the item to the Board. Mr. Jones gave his testimony. Joan Moss spoke as public input only not relevant to case. (b) Water Resources Director Scott DeLeon presented the item to the Board. Jose Zapeda gave his testimony. (c) Water Resources Director Scott DeLeon presented the item to the Board. Jason Buckley was not present.
8.49:30 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - (Sitting concurrently as the Board of Supervisors, Kelseyville County Water District #3 Board of Directors and Lake County Sanitation District Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolutions for Collection of Delinquent Water, Sewer and Annual Lighting Fees. Public Hearing
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: July 21, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Mark Dellinger, Special Districts Administrator Josefine Ecklor, Fiscal Officer Marcy Harrison, Accountant II · Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - (Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA# 2, 6, 7, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of (a) Resolution Confirming collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water & Sewer Fees; and (d) Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 21, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. a PUBLIC HEARING will be held to hear protests regarding the placement of Lighting Fees and Delinquent Water, and Sewer Fees on the 2015-2016 Tax Rolls for collection. Resolutions, once approved by your Board, authorize this action in accordance with Section 55501 of the Water Code, and Sections 25215.4 and 25215.5 of the Government Code. The required Resolutions are attached. The authorization by your Board for placement of the Delinquent Sewer Fees is accomplished by motion of one of the Board members, in accordance with Section 25215.4 of the Government Code. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Collection of Annual Lighting Fees and Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): none ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA# 2, 6, 7, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors) - (a) Adopt Resolution Confirming collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Adopt Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Adopt Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water & Sewer Fees; and (d) Adopt Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Mark Dellinger, Special Districts Administrator Josefine Ecklor, Fiscal Officer Marcy Harrison, Accountant II DATE: July 21, 2015 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - (Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA# 2, 6, 7, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of (a) Resolution Confirming collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water & Sewer Fees; and (d) Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 21, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. a PUBLIC HEARING will be held to hear protests regarding the placement of Lighting Fees and Delinquent Water, and Sewer Fees on the 2015-2016 Tax Rolls for collection. Resolutions, once approved by your Board, authorize this action in accordance with Section 55501 of the Water Code, and Sections 25215.4 and 25215.5 of the Government Code. The required Resolutions are attached. The authorization by your Board for placement of the Delinquent Sewer Fees is accomplished by motion of one of the Board members, in accordance with Section 25215.4 of the Government Code. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Collection of Annual Lighting Fees and Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): none ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA# 2, 6, 7, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors) - (a) Adopt Resolution Confirming collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Adopt Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Adopt Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water & Sewer Fees; and (d) Adopt Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District.
Supervisor Brown offered Resolution No. 2015-100 confirming collection of annual fees in CSA No.1, and it was passed by rollcall vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 4 - Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Supervisors: 1 - Comstock Supervisor Brown offered Resolution No. 2015-101 confirming collection of delinquent water fees in CSA Nos. 2, 6, 7, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, and 22, and it was passed by rollcall vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 4 - Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Supervisors: 1 - Comstock Director Brown offered Resolution No. 2015-102 confirming collection of delinquent sewer fees in Lake County Sanitation District, and it was passed by rollcall vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 4 - Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Supervisors: 1 - Comstock Director Brown offered Resolution No. 2015-103 confirming collection of delinquent charges for servicess rendered in Kelseyville County Waterworks District #3, and it was passed by rollcall vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 4 - Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Supervisors: 1 - Comstock
Clerk’s notes: Sitting concurrently as the Board of Supervisors, Kelseyville County Water District #3 Board of Directors and Lake County Sanitation District Board of Directors) - Chair Farrington opened the public hearing. Special Districts Deputy Administrator- Fiscal, Josefine Ecklor and Accountant II, Marcy Harrison presented the item to the Board. Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one pressent wished to speak and the public hearing was closed.
8.59:45 A.M. - (Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District Board of Directors) - Consideration of the LCAQMD FY 15/16 Draft Budget, BU's 8799 & 8798 and policy recommendations. Report Motion carried · 5 motions
Carried 4-0 — moved by Smith
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 4-0 — moved by Brown
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 4-0 — moved by Smith
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 4-0 — moved by Smith
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 4-0 — moved by Smith
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 7, 2015 · To: Board of Directors · From: Douglas Gearhart Air Pollution Control Officer · Subject: Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District Board of Directors, Consideration of the LCAQMD FY 15/16 Draft Budget. July 21, 2015 @ 9:45am, Budget Units #8799 & #8798. Consideration of Priorities and Updates for Board Awareness

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Lake County Air Quality Management District (District) maintains an active and effective air quality management program to protect the health and welfare of the populace of the Lake County Air Basin. This is a shared mission with State and Federal agencies. The District has primary responsibility for stationary air pollution sources in conformance with all District regulations and State and Federal laws. As a designated Air Basin, the District participates in several local, state and federal programs by law. Staff is recommending the BOD approve the FY 15/16 Draft Budget. Staff is also requesting Board support for ongoing policies related to pursuing funding for local fleets, pursuing funds from the State and Federal Government to support the additional workload placed on the District by those agencies, that the BOD support District staff taking a more active role in CAPCOA (the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association) Board to ensure Lake County is adequately represented when at the State, and that the BOD continue the policy directive that health issues and mandated programs/requirements be given top priority followed by all other activities. This Draft Budget hearing is intended to meet the requirements of California Health and Safety Code Section 40131 for Air Districts. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. That the Board of Directors approve the FY 15/16 Draft Budget proposed for the District. 2. That the Board of Directors continue to be on record as opposed to any further State subvention cuts to the District, and support District staff seeking additional funding from the State to support the additional work load placed on the District. 3. That the Board of Directors be on record as supporting District staff continue to work with State Legislators seeking program flexibility and additional funding from the State or Federal Government or other entities to assist local fleets. If funds are identified, the options will be brought to this Board for approval. 4. That the Board of Directors be on record as supporting District staff continue to work with CAPCOA to represent the needs and interests of Lake County related to Air Quality program funding, regulations, and benefits. 5. That the Board of Directors continue their policy directive that health impacts, health risks, health based complaints, and mandated programs/requirements be given top priority, followed by activities that have regulatory time frames, and other funded activities, or as directed by this Board.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors FROM: Douglas Gearhart Air Pollution Control Officer DATE: July 7, 2015 SUBJECT: Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District Board of Directors, Consideration of the LCAQMD FY 15/16 Draft Budget. July 21, 2015 @ 9:45am, Budget Units #8799 & #8798. Consideration of Priorities and Updates for Board Awareness EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Lake County Air Quality Management District (District) maintains an active and effective air quality management program to protect the health and welfare of the populace of the Lake County Air Basin. This is a shared mission with State and Federal agencies. The District has primary responsibility for stationary air pollution sources in conformance with all District regulations and State and Federal laws. As a designated Air Basin, the District participates in several local, state and federal programs by law. Staff is recommending the BOD approve the FY 15/16 Draft Budget. Staff is also requesting Board support for ongoing policies related to pursuing funding for local fleets, pursuing funds from the State and Federal Government to support the additional workload placed on the District by those agencies, that the BOD support District staff taking a more active role in CAPCOA (the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association) Board to ensure Lake County is adequately represented when at the State, and that the BOD continue the policy directive that health issues and mandated programs/requirements be given top priority followed by all other activities. This Draft Budget hearing is intended to meet the requirements of California Health and Safety Code Section 40131 for Air Districts. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. That the Board of Directors approve the FY 15/16 Draft Budget proposed for the District. 2. That the Board of Directors continue to be on record as opposed to any further State subvention cuts to the District, and support District staff seeking additional funding from the State to support the additional work load placed on the District. 3. That the Board of Directors be on record as supporting District staff continue to work with State Legislators seeking program flexibility and additional funding from the State or Federal Government or other entities to assist local fleets. If funds are identified, the options will be brought to this Board for approval. 4. That the Board of Directors be on record as supporting District staff continue to work with CAPCOA to represent the needs and interests of Lake County related to Air Quality program funding, regulations, and benefits. 5. That the Board of Directors continue their policy directive that health impacts, health risks, health based complaints, and mandated programs/requirements be given top priority, followed by activities that have regulatory time frames, and other funded activities, or as directed by this Board.
On motion of Director Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved the FY 15/16 Draft Budget proposed for the District. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Directors Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Director Comstock On motion of Director Brown, and by vote of the Board, continued to be on record as opposed to any further State subvention cuts to the District, and supported District staff seeking additional funding from the State to support the additional work load placed on the District. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Directors Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Director Comstock On motion of Director Smith, and by vote of the Board, to be on record as supporting District staff to continue to work with State Legislators seeking program flexibility and additional funding from the State or Federal Government or other entities to assist local fleets. If funds are identified, the options will be brought to this Board for approval.The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Directors Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Director Comstock On motion of Director Smith, and by vote of the Board, to be on record as supporting District staff to continue to work with CAPCOA to represent the needs and interests of Lake County related to Air Quality program funding, regulations, and benefits.The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Directors Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Director Comstock On motion of Director Smith, and by vote of the Board, to continue their policy directive that health impacts, health risks, health based complaints, and mandated programs/requirements be given top priority, followed by activities that have regulatory time frames, and other funded activities, or as directed by this Board. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Directors Smith, Steele, Brown and Farrington Absent- Director Comstock
Clerk’s notes: (Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District Board of Directors) Chair Farrington opened the public hearing. Air Quality Director Doug Gearhart and Air Quality Program Coordinator Elizabeth Knight presented the proposed the LCAQMD FY 15/16 Draft Budget, BU's 8799 & 8798 and policy recommendations to the Board. Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak and Tom Slate spoke. No one else wished to speak and the public hearing was closed.
8.610:00 AM - PUBLIC HEARING - (This Hearing will be continued to August 18, 2015 @ 10:00 A.M.) - Consideration of an appeal to the Board of Supervisors (AB 15-02) of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the Major Use Permit (UP 15-01, IS 15-03) and mitigated negative declaration to allow construction of a 9,100 sq. ft. Dollar General Store, Kelseyville; appellants are Cross Development, LLC; site is located at 4315 Douglas Street and 5505 Main Street, Kelseyville (APNs 008-710-50 & 51) Public Hearing
Staff memo

Date: July 7, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Richard Coel, Community Development Director Prepared by: Michalyn DelValle, Senior Planner · Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Major Use Permit for Dollar General Store, Kelseyville; AB 15-02 APN's 008-710-50 and 51 Supervisor District 5

EXHIBITS: A. Appeal Form B. Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated May 28, 2015 C. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated May 13, 2015 D. Proposed Modified UP 15-01 Conditions E. Public Comments Letters BACKGROUND The appellant is appealing the Planning Commission's May 28, 2015 unanimous denial of a Major Use Permit (UP 15-01) to permit construction of an approximately 9,100 square foot general retail store (Dollar General) at 4315 Douglas Street and 5505 Main Street, Kelseyville. The appeal was filed by the applicant, Cross Development citing that the project is in conformance with the Community Character of downtown Kelseyville. There was considerable controversy during the Planning Commission hearing. Approximately 10 members of the public spoke against the project citing various concerns, including character, economic concerns and impact to small local businesses, wrong location and traffic concerns for school children. Several letters were submitted by members of the public that also expressed these concerns, and a few letters expressed support of having a Dollar General store in Kelseyville. These letters are included as Exhibit E. The Planning Commission cited the following additional concerns with the proposed project: appropriateness of alcoholic beverage license; the Clearlake Oaks Dollar General store had not demonstrated a track record of giving back or being part of the community and had not reached out to the nearby school; concern that this store would not be a good neighbor; and, that its proximity to Kelseyville High School was not ideal. During the Planning Commission hearing staff presented several recommended modifications (BOS Exhibit D) to the project to address some of the compatibility concerns which included: * Requiring larger planted shrubs and trees * Reducing the amount of signage and prohibiting a freestanding sign * Providing additional pedestrian access * Reducing the amount of parking spaces * Limiting the hours of commercial truck deliveries * Extending enhanced architectural design around all sides of the building and completely screening roof-mounted equipment. These recommendations were presented as an attempt to bring the project more into conformance with the community character of Kelseyville. The Planning Commission denied the project on a 5-0 vote stating that: A. The site, located across from a high school, is not appropriate for this proposed project due to the high traffic and pedestrian volumes. B. The project, as designed is not compatible with the community character of Kelseyville. II. APPEAL DISCUSSION The appeal form submitted by Cross Development (BOS Exhibit A) states: "As the applicant on the above referenced project, Cross Development wishes to appeal the decision of the Lake County Planning Commission in regards to case# UP15-01. We believe that the Planning Commission's decision did not take in to account all of the facts outlined in the staff report, the findings outlined in the Initial Study (IS 15-03), and the conditions of approval placed on the project which, in our opinion, serve to address concerns raised and ensure that all impacts will be properly mitigated in accordance with applicable codes, regulations, and policies. We believe that the project will not negatively impact the high school in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation and can, in fact, serve to promote a vibrant downtown in Kelseyville. Analysis has been submitted to Lake County demonstrating that traffic volumes associated with Dollar General will not unduly burden area roadways and access has been designed to Lake County standards to ensure conflicts with the High School will not result. Also, it is important to note that peak traffic hours associated with the school are different than that of Dollar General. As such, no pedestrian or traffic conflicts are anticipated. In terms of the Planning Commission's related to community character, Dollar General will be complementary to existing commercial businesses along Main Street. There are currently a variety of commercial uses and building styles located along Main Street. Dollar General is an appropriate use given the surrounding land use patterns and conditions included with the Major Use Permit further ensure compatibility." Staff had made several recommendations for modifications to the project design in an attempt to address concerns related to inconsistency with community character, to bring the project into conformance with the community of Kelseyville's design guidelines. Additionally, the Department of Public Works, during initial review of the project, did not request that a traffic study be conducted for this development as they believed it was not warranted. Most of the traffic related concerns expressed by members of the public and the Superintendent of the Kelseyville Unified School District were related to pedestrian traffic from the High School at this location. The current zoning of this project site is "C2", Community Commercial, with a land use designation of Community Commercial. This district allows for general retail stores as a use-by-right if the building does not exceed 5,000 square feet. Other uses that would be allowed by right on this parcel include restaurant, professional offices, bank or indoor entertainment of up to 5,000 square feet, or a small hotel. Because the proposed Dollar General store is larger, at 9,100 square feet, Section 19.5(a) of the Lake County Zoning Ordinance requires that approval of a major use permit be obtained. Therefore, staff believes that the focus of this appeal should be centered on project design (site layout and building architecture) and pedestrian traffic concerns. ..Recommended Action III. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission did not take any action on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration that was prepared for the project, since projects that are denied are not subject to CEQA. Should the Board of Supervisors decide to grant the appeal request to Cross Development, this project will need to be brought back to the Planning Commission for CEQA action, and presumably for amendments to the proposed use permit conditions to require project revisions addressing community character concerns. Sample Motions: Appeal Approval: I move that the Board of Supervisors make an intended decision to grant appeal AB 15-02 and overturn the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 15-01 applied for by Cross Development on behalf of Dollar General, on property located at 4315 Douglas Street and 5505 Main Street, Kelseyville, and direct County Counsel to prepare findings of fact before remanding the project back to the Planning Commission for completion of environmental review. Appeal Denial: I move that the Board of Supervisors make an intended decision to deny the appeal AB 15-02 and sustain the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 15-01 for Cross Development, on behalf of Dollar General, and direct County Counsel to prepare proposed findings of fact.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Richard Coel, Community Development Director Prepared by: Michalyn DelValle, Senior Planner DATE: July 7, 2015 SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Major Use Permit for Dollar General Store, Kelseyville; AB 15-02 APN's 008-710-50 and 51 Supervisor District 5 EXHIBITS: A. Appeal Form B. Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated May 28, 2015 C. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated May 13, 2015 D. Proposed Modified UP 15-01 Conditions E. Public Comments Letters BACKGROUND The appellant is appealing the Planning Commission's May 28, 2015 unanimous denial of a Major Use Permit (UP 15-01) to permit construction of an approximately 9,100 square foot general retail store (Dollar General) at 4315 Douglas Street and 5505 Main Street, Kelseyville. The appeal was filed by the applicant, Cross Development citing that the project is in conformance with the Community Character of downtown Kelseyville. There was considerable controversy during the Planning Commission hearing. Approximately 10 members of the public spoke against the project citing various concerns, including character, economic concerns and impact to small local businesses, wrong location and traffic concerns for school children. Several letters were submitted by members of the public that also expressed these concerns, and a few letters expressed support of having a Dollar General store in Kelseyville. These letters are included as Exhibit E. The Planning Commission cited the following additional concerns with the proposed project: appropriateness of alcoholic beverage license; the Clearlake Oaks Dollar General store had not demonstrated a track record of giving back or being part of the community and had not reached out to the nearby school; concern that this store would not be a good neighbor; and, that its proximity to Kelseyville High School was not ideal. During the Planning Commission hearing staff presented several recommended modifications (BOS Exhibit D) to the project to address some of the compatibility concerns which included: * Requiring larger planted shrubs and trees * Reducing the amount of signage and prohibiting a freestanding sign * Providing additional pedestrian access * Reducing the amount of parking spaces * Limiting the hours of commercial truck deliveries * Extending enhanced architectural design around all sides of the building and completely screening roof-mounted equipment. These recommendations were presented as an attempt to bring the project more into conformance with the community character of Kelseyville. The Planning Commission denied the project on a 5-0 vote stating that: A. The site, located across from a high school, is not appropriate for this proposed project due to the high traffic and pedestrian volumes. B. The project, as designed is not compatible with the community character of Kelseyville. II. APPEAL DISCUSSION The appeal form submitted by Cross Development (BOS Exhibit A) states: "As the applicant on the above referenced project, Cross Development wishes to appeal the decision of the Lake County Planning Commission in regards to case# UP15-01. We believe that the Planning Commission's decision did not take in to account all of the facts outlined in the staff report, the findings outlined in the Initial Study (IS 15-03), and the conditions of approval placed on the project which, in our opinion, serve to address concerns raised and ensure that all impacts will be properly mitigated in accordance with applicable codes, regulations, and policies. We believe that the project will not negatively impact the high school in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation and can, in fact, serve to promote a vibrant downtown in Kelseyville. Analysis has been submitted to Lake County demonstrating that traffic volumes associated with Dollar General will not unduly burden area roadways and access has been designed to Lake County standards to ensure conflicts with the High School will not result. Also, it is important to note that peak traffic hours associated with the school are different than that of Dollar General. As such, no pedestrian or traffic conflicts are anticipated. In terms of the Planning Commission's related to community character, Dollar General will be complementary to existing commercial businesses along Main Street. There are currently a variety of commercial uses and building styles located along Main Street. Dollar General is an appropriate use given the surrounding land use patterns and conditions included with the Major Use Permit further ensure compatibility." Staff had made several recommendations for modifications to the project design in an attempt to address concerns related to inconsistency with community character, to bring the project into conformance with the community of Kelseyville's design guidelines. Additionally, the Department of Public Works, during initial review of the project, did not request that a traffic study be conducted for this development as they believed it was not warranted. Most of the traffic related concerns expressed by members of the public and the Superintendent of the Kelseyville Unified School District were related to pedestrian traffic from the High School at this location. The current zoning of this project site is "C2", Community Commercial, with a land use designation of Community Commercial. This district allows for general retail stores as a use-by-right if the building does not exceed 5,000 square feet. Other uses that would be allowed by right on this parcel include restaurant, professional offices, bank or indoor entertainment of up to 5,000 square feet, or a small hotel. Because the proposed Dollar General store is larger, at 9,100 square feet, Section 19.5(a) of the Lake County Zoning Ordinance requires that approval of a major use permit be obtained. Therefore, staff believes that the focus of this appeal should be centered on project design (site layout and building architecture) and pedestrian traffic concerns. ..Recommended Action III. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission did not take any action on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration that was prepared for the project, since projects that are denied are not subject to CEQA. Should the Board of Supervisors decide to grant the appeal request to Cross Development, this project will need to be brought back to the Planning Commission for CEQA action, and presumably for amendments to the proposed use permit conditions to require project revisions addressing community character concerns. Sample Motions: Appeal Approval: I move that the Board of Supervisors make an intended decision to grant appeal AB 15-02 and overturn the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 15-01 applied for by Cross Development on behalf of Dollar General, on property located at 4315 Douglas Street and 5505 Main Street, Kelseyville, and direct County Counsel to prepare findings of fact before remanding the project back to the Planning Commission for completion of environmental review. Appeal Denial: I move that the Board of Supervisors make an intended decision to deny the appeal AB 15-02 and sustain the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 15-01 for Cross Development, on behalf of Dollar General, and direct County Counsel to prepare proposed findings of fact.
Clerk’s notes: Chair Farrington opened the public hearing to announce that this item will be continued to August 25, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., at which time both Supervisors Comstock and Smith will be present.
8.710:00 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING- Consideration/Discussion of Renaming an Existing Road in the Kelseyville Area - Forrest’s Road Public Hearing approved — Pass
Carried 3-0 — moved by Steele (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: absent Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: June 4, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director · Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration/Discussion of Renaming an Existing Road in the Kelseyville Area - Forrest's Road

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On June 23, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved a Resolution of Intent to rename an existing road to Forrest's Road. A public hearing on this matter has been set for July 21, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. Staff has prepared this item for your Board's consideration in accordance with County policy and at the request of the applicant. There are no other roads in the County with the name of Forrest's Road. Forrest's Road will continue to be in the County-maintained Road System. SD:cb,gh Attachment ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director DATE: June 4, 2015 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration/Discussion of Renaming an Existing Road in the Kelseyville Area - Forrest's Road EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On June 23, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved a Resolution of Intent to rename an existing road to Forrest's Road. A public hearing on this matter has been set for July 21, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. Staff has prepared this item for your Board's consideration in accordance with County policy and at the request of the applicant. There are no other roads in the County with the name of Forrest's Road. Forrest's Road will continue to be in the County-maintained Road System. SD:cb,gh Attachment ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The Board found that the circumstances of community support justified extraordinary circumstances making an exception to the 4/5 vote. On motion of Supervisor Steele, and by vote of the Board, approved the road name change in Kelseyville, CA from Douglas Road to Forrest's Road. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Chair Farrington opened the public hearing. County Surveyor Gordon Haggitt and County Counsel Anita Grant presented the item to the Board. Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following people spoke: Nick Waynewright & David Owen. There was tremendous support through out the community and county for the road name change. No one else present wished to speak and the public hearing was closed.
8.810:15 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration/Discussion to Name an Existing Unnamed Road in Upper Lake - Patty Lane Public Hearing denied — Pass
Carried 3-0 — moved by Steele (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: abstain Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 21, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director Gordon Haggitt, County Surveyor · Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration/Discussion to Name an Existing Unnamed Road in the Bachelor Valley area of Upper Lake - Patty Lane

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 7, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved a Resolution of Intent to name an existing unnamed road to Patty Lane. A public hearing on this matter has been set for July 21, 2015 at 10:15 a.m. Staff has prepared this item for your Board's consideration in accordance with County policy and at the request of the applicant. There are no other roads in the County with the name of Patty Lane. Patty Lane is not in the County-maintained Road System nor is it proposed to be and the proposed name is to be for identification purposes. SD:cb,gh Attachment ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director Gordon Haggitt, County Surveyor DATE: July 21, 2015 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration/Discussion to Name an Existing Unnamed Road in the Bachelor Valley area of Upper Lake - Patty Lane EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 7, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved a Resolution of Intent to name an existing unnamed road to Patty Lane. A public hearing on this matter has been set for July 21, 2015 at 10:15 a.m. Staff has prepared this item for your Board's consideration in accordance with County policy and at the request of the applicant. There are no other roads in the County with the name of Patty Lane. Patty Lane is not in the County-maintained Road System nor is it proposed to be and the proposed name is to be for identification purposes. SD:cb,gh Attachment ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
On motion of Supervisor Steele, and by vote of the Board, denied the naming of an unnamed road in Bachelor Valley. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Chair Farrington opened the public hearing. County Surveyor Gordon Haggitt and County Counsel Anita Grant presented the item to the Board. Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following people spoke: Carrie Sparehawn, Patty Raetz, John Ham, Ron Raetz, Renee Wehner, Rye Gilley. No one else present wished to speak and the public hearing was closed.
8.910:30 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-78 Relating to Fire Mitigation Fees to Correct a Typographical Error which indicates an increase from $0.80 to $1.00 in Exhibit A Thereto as to the Fire Mitigation Fee to be Imposed by Northshore Fire Protection District Public Hearing Adopted — Pass
Carried 4-0 (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 8, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Matt Perry, County Administrative Officer · Subject: Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-78 Relating to Fire Mitigation Fees

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On June 2, 2015, your Board approved the Resolution Approving Resolutions and Capital Fire Facility and Equipment Plans Submitted by Lake County Fire Agencies and Updating the Lake County Capital Fire Facility and Equipment Plan. After adoption, we noticed a typographical error in the resolution regarding the Fire Mitigation Fee to be imposed by Northshore Fire Protection District, which translated to a typographical error in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2015-78. Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2015-78 consists in part of the resolutions adopted by Lake County fire agencies whereby their respective fire mitigation fees are imposed. The Resolution adopted by the Northshore Fire Protection District contains a typographical error in that, while the dollar amount of the fee is correct, that amount does not correctly reflect the percentage of the fire mitigation fee ceiling. The typographical error occurs on page 1, line 28, and has now been corrected to read 100% instead of 80%. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the approval of the Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-78 Relating to Fire Mitigation Fees to Correct a Typographical Error in Exhibit A Thereto as to the Fire Mitigation Fee to be Imposed by Northshore Fire Protection District.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Matt Perry, County Administrative Officer DATE: July 8, 2015 SUBJECT: Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-78 Relating to Fire Mitigation Fees EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On June 2, 2015, your Board approved the Resolution Approving Resolutions and Capital Fire Facility and Equipment Plans Submitted by Lake County Fire Agencies and Updating the Lake County Capital Fire Facility and Equipment Plan. After adoption, we noticed a typographical error in the resolution regarding the Fire Mitigation Fee to be imposed by Northshore Fire Protection District, which translated to a typographical error in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2015-78. Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2015-78 consists in part of the resolutions adopted by Lake County fire agencies whereby their respective fire mitigation fees are imposed. The Resolution adopted by the Northshore Fire Protection District contains a typographical error in that, while the dollar amount of the fee is correct, that amount does not correctly reflect the percentage of the fire mitigation fee ceiling. The typographical error occurs on page 1, line 28, and has now been corrected to read 100% instead of 80%. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends the approval of the Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-78 Relating to Fire Mitigation Fees to Correct a Typographical Error in Exhibit A Thereto as to the Fire Mitigation Fee to be Imposed by Northshore Fire Protection District.
Supervisor Smith offered the resolution and it was passed by roll call vote. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: County Administrative Officer Matt Perry presented the item to the Board. Chair Farrington opened the public hearing. No one present wished to speak and the public hearing was closed.

9. Non-Timed Items

9.1Supervisors’ weekly calendar, travel and reports
9.2Consideration of the Following Appointments: Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) Library Advisory Board Appointment
Staff memo

Date: July 8, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Sara Shucart, Assistant Clerk of the Board · Subject: Consideration of Advisory Board appointments

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Emergency Medical Care Committee - Eleven (11) vacancies Application Received: Yvonne Fuqua - new applicant Library Advisory Board - Two (2) vacancies Application Received: Robin Harris - new applicant FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Sara Shucart, Assistant Clerk of the Board DATE: July 8, 2015 SUBJECT: Consideration of Advisory Board appointments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Emergency Medical Care Committee - Eleven (11) vacancies Application Received: Yvonne Fuqua - new applicant Library Advisory Board - Two (2) vacancies Application Received: Robin Harris - new applicant FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Clerk’s notes: The applications for this item were not made available to the public; therefore the Board requested this item be continued to future meeting with the backup available to the Board and public.
9.3Consideration of Proposed Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement (APN Nos. 010-043-01 and 010-043-52) between the County of Lake and Veterans Housing Development Corporation to Provide Supportive Housing for Veterans and Their Families Agreement
no itemized roll call in the official record
The Board directed staff to proceed with negotiations and include Supervisors Farrington and Smith, as well as directed staff to incorporate language clarifying "a portion of" APN No. 010-043-52 and fix a typographocal error in the contract from (A) & (C) to (A) & (B).
Clerk’s notes: Deputy County Administrative Officer Jennifer DeHaan presented the item to the Board, Peter Cameron of the Veteran's Housing Development Corporation was also present. Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following people spoke: Andy Peterson, Larry Anderson. No one else present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.4Consideration of Findings and Recommendations of the Classification and Compensation Committee for FY 2015-16 and Authorize Human Resources Director to Conduct Meet and Confer with the Applicable Employee Associations. Action Item approved — Pass
Carried 4-0 — moved by Brown (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 7, 2015 · To: The Honorable Board of Supervisors · From: Classification and Compensation Committee By: Sarah Jansen, Deputy Human Resources Director · Subject: Approve in Concept Out-of-Cycle Findings and Recommendations of the Classification and Compensation Committee for FY 2015-16 and Authorize Human Resources Director to Conduct Meet and Confer with the Applicable Employee Associations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Classification and Compensation Committee has reviewed several reclassification and salary adjustment requests outside of the normal reclassification cycle related to current staffing issues and succession planning. The Committee met, reviewed and discussed the requests, and made Committee determinations. Below you will find a list of the requests, not already considered by your Board, that were received by the Committee, the Committee's recommendation for each request and the reason(s) for the Committee's determination. Public Works Public Works Fiscal Coordinator I/II Department is requesting to create a new Public Works Fiscal Coordinator I/II flex series. Proposed Grade and entry step: Public Works Fiscal Coordinator I Grade B23 $21.9041 Public Works Fiscal Coordinator II Grade B25 $24.1493 Committee Recommendation: Approve request. Reasoning: The creation of this flex series will allow the department to begin succession planning their fiscal functions, as well as allowing for cross-training on complex fiscal and reporting issues unique to the Department of Public Works. Cost Information: The salary of the Fiscal Coordinator II is equal to the Public Works Analyst, which will be eliminated upon the next vacancy. Therefore, in the long term there will be no affect on cost. In the near term there will be a slight increase in cost while the Fiscal Coordinator I and Public Works Analyst are both filled. This will not affect the general fund as the Public Works Administration budget unit is self-funded. (Requires Meet and Confer) Social Services Salary Adjustment for professional staff assigned to Child Welfare functions. Department is requesting to increase the salaries for professional classifications assigned to Child Welfare Services by 7.5% due to critical staffing shortages related to recruitment and retention issues. Affected Classifications and Proposed Grades: Social Worker I - CPS Grade B19 Social Worker II - CPS Grade B21 Social Worker III - CPS Grade B23 Social Worker IV - CPS Grade B25 Social Worker Supervisor I - CPS Grade B26 Social Worker Supervisor II - CPS Grade B28 Program Manager - CPS Grade B31 Deputy Social Services Director - CPS Grade B34 Committee Recommendation: Approve request. Reasoning: The Department of Social Services is facing critical staffing issues in Child Welfare Services. This affects the department's ability to effectively protect at risk, neglected and abused children, which could have dire consequences. The increase in salary for positions assigned to Child Welfare Services should assist in the department's ability to attract qualified staff to fill these critical vacancies. Cost Information: The Department of Social Services is self-funded, therefore the proposed increases will not affect the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) Legal Analyst I/II Department is requesting to create a new Legal Analyst I/II class series. Proposed Grade and entry step: Legal Analyst I Grade A18 $16.7438 Legal Analyst II Grade A20 $18.4600 Committee Recommendation: Approve request. Reasoning: This flex series will be assigned to the Child Welfare Services functions of the Department of Social Services. The creation of the flex series will allow the department to have a dedicated staff member to ensure reporting requirements, court requirements, and other legal and/or compliance support related to Child Welfare Services are performed in a timely, effective way. In addition, this position will allow other professional staff assigned to Child Welfare Services to focus on other critical issues related to the protection of at risk, neglected and abused children. Cost Information: The Department of Social Services is self-funded, therefore the proposed increases will not affect the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff requests that your Board approve in concept these recommendations, and authorize the Human Resources Director to initiate the Meet and Confer process with employee associations, as applicable. Thank you for your consideration. cc: Kathy Ferguson, Human Resources Director
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Board of Supervisors FROM: Classification and Compensation Committee By: Sarah Jansen, Deputy Human Resources Director DATE: July 7, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve in Concept Out-of-Cycle Findings and Recommendations of the Classification and Compensation Committee for FY 2015-16 and Authorize Human Resources Director to Conduct Meet and Confer with the Applicable Employee Associations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Classification and Compensation Committee has reviewed several reclassification and salary adjustment requests outside of the normal reclassification cycle related to current staffing issues and succession planning. The Committee met, reviewed and discussed the requests, and made Committee determinations. Below you will find a list of the requests, not already considered by your Board, that were received by the Committee, the Committee's recommendation for each request and the reason(s) for the Committee's determination. Public Works Public Works Fiscal Coordinator I/II Department is requesting to create a new Public Works Fiscal Coordinator I/II flex series. Proposed Grade and entry step: Public Works Fiscal Coordinator I Grade B23 $21.9041 Public Works Fiscal Coordinator II Grade B25 $24.1493 Committee Recommendation: Approve request. Reasoning: The creation of this flex series will allow the department to begin succession planning their fiscal functions, as well as allowing for cross-training on complex fiscal and reporting issues unique to the Department of Public Works. Cost Information: The salary of the Fiscal Coordinator II is equal to the Public Works Analyst, which will be eliminated upon the next vacancy. Therefore, in the long term there will be no affect on cost. In the near term there will be a slight increase in cost while the Fiscal Coordinator I and Public Works Analyst are both filled. This will not affect the general fund as the Public Works Administration budget unit is self-funded. (Requires Meet and Confer) Social Services Salary Adjustment for professional staff assigned to Child Welfare functions. Department is requesting to increase the salaries for professional classifications assigned to Child Welfare Services by 7.5% due to critical staffing shortages related to recruitment and retention issues. Affected Classifications and Proposed Grades: Social Worker I - CPS Grade B19 Social Worker II - CPS Grade B21 Social Worker III - CPS Grade B23 Social Worker IV - CPS Grade B25 Social Worker Supervisor I - CPS Grade B26 Social Worker Supervisor II - CPS Grade B28 Program Manager - CPS Grade B31 Deputy Social Services Director - CPS Grade B34 Committee Recommendation: Approve request. Reasoning: The Department of Social Services is facing critical staffing issues in Child Welfare Services. This affects the department's ability to effectively protect at risk, neglected and abused children, which could have dire consequences. The increase in salary for positions assigned to Child Welfare Services should assist in the department's ability to attract qualified staff to fill these critical vacancies. Cost Information: The Department of Social Services is self-funded, therefore the proposed increases will not affect the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) Legal Analyst I/II Department is requesting to create a new Legal Analyst I/II class series. Proposed Grade and entry step: Legal Analyst I Grade A18 $16.7438 Legal Analyst II Grade A20 $18.4600 Committee Recommendation: Approve request. Reasoning: This flex series will be assigned to the Child Welfare Services functions of the Department of Social Services. The creation of the flex series will allow the department to have a dedicated staff member to ensure reporting requirements, court requirements, and other legal and/or compliance support related to Child Welfare Services are performed in a timely, effective way. In addition, this position will allow other professional staff assigned to Child Welfare Services to focus on other critical issues related to the protection of at risk, neglected and abused children. Cost Information: The Department of Social Services is self-funded, therefore the proposed increases will not affect the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff requests that your Board approve in concept these recommendations, and authorize the Human Resources Director to initiate the Meet and Confer process with employee associations, as applicable. Thank you for your consideration. cc: Kathy Ferguson, Human Resources Director
On motion of Supervisor Brown, and by vote of the Board, approved in concept these recommendations, and authorized the Human Resources Director to initiate the Meet and Confer process with employee associations, as applicable. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Deputy Human Resources Director Sarah Jansen presented the item to the Board. Chair Farrington asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one present wished to speak on this item and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.5(Sitting as the Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Approve Purchase Agreement for Property located at 755 & 737 E. State Hwy 20, Upper Lake (APN 004-010-04 & 004-013-18), in the amount of $1,510,000 which is fully funded by CDWR grant funds for the Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecoysytem Restoration Project, and authorize the Chair to sign, and authorize the Clerk of the Board to certify the grant deed for recordation. Action Item approved — Pass
Carried 4-0 — moved by Steele (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 6, 2015 · To: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District · From: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director · Subject: Consent Agenda Item for July 21, 2015 Property Acquisition - Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project - Approval of Purchase Contract APN 004-010-04 & 004-013-18, 755 & 737 E State HWY 20, Upper Lake

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On March 23, 2004 the Lake County Watershed Protection District (District) entered into an agreement with the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) for the Flood Protection Corridor Program Grant (5.214 million dollars). Grant funds were frozen in December 2008 due to the State's fiscal problems. The agreement was amended in May 2011 extending the grant and adding additional funds (total funds of 12.714 million dollars). The grant provides funds for the purchase of flood prone properties, from willing sellers in the Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project (Project) area. The Project is one step in the process of restoring damaged habitat and the water quality of the Clear Lake watershed. To date, seventeen properties have been appraised and purchased. The grant requires that the acquisition of the real properties and the relocation of the occupants be conducted in the conformance with applicable Federal and State policies and procedures. The State Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, provides that any public entity may, in order to prevent unnecessary expenses and duplication of functions, and to promote uniform and effective administration of relocation assistance programs, utilize the services of other agencies having an established organization to manage and implement relocation assistance programs. In October of 2012 the Board entered into an agreement with Paragon Partners LLC to provide acquisition and relocation services. Paragon Partners LLC recently completed the appraisal process on several properties and presented offers to those property owners. Today's item presents an accepted offer for the following property: APN 004-010-04 & 004-013-18, 755 & 737 E State Highway 20, Upper Lake: The 115.25 acre property has a 49 acre vineyard and vacant land (formerly vineyard) and is owned by Robinson Lake Vineyard LLC. The fair market value is $1,510,000 as established by an independent fee appraisal and review by the State of California, Department of Water Resources, Real Estate Division. This acquisition is fully funded by the DWR Grant. The northern portion of the property (approximately 40 acres) is outside of the Project boundaries. Staff is investigating options for this portion of the property. Attached as Exhibit "A" is a vicinity map showing the location of the subject property. This acquisition is necessary for the purpose of flood control protection as provided in the State of California Water Code Section 79037, Division 26, Chapter 5, Article 2.5. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chair to sign the real property purchase contract along with instructions to the Clerk to certify the grant deed for recordation. The grant deed will be recorded by a Title guarantee company upon the Board's acceptance. To minimize reproduction costs, the original documents are attached to the Clerk's copy of the original cover memo and only a copy of this memo is furnished for each individual Board member. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None X__Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $1,510,000 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chair to sign the real property purchase contract along with instructions to the Clerk to certify the grant deed for recordation. The grant deed will be recorded by a Title guarantee company upon the Board's acceptance.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District FROM: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director DATE: July 6, 2015 SUBJECT: Consent Agenda Item for July 21, 2015 Property Acquisition - Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project - Approval of Purchase Contract APN 004-010-04 & 004-013-18, 755 & 737 E State HWY 20, Upper Lake EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On March 23, 2004 the Lake County Watershed Protection District (District) entered into an agreement with the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) for the Flood Protection Corridor Program Grant (5.214 million dollars). Grant funds were frozen in December 2008 due to the State's fiscal problems. The agreement was amended in May 2011 extending the grant and adding additional funds (total funds of 12.714 million dollars). The grant provides funds for the purchase of flood prone properties, from willing sellers in the Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project (Project) area. The Project is one step in the process of restoring damaged habitat and the water quality of the Clear Lake watershed. To date, seventeen properties have been appraised and purchased. The grant requires that the acquisition of the real properties and the relocation of the occupants be conducted in the conformance with applicable Federal and State policies and procedures. The State Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, provides that any public entity may, in order to prevent unnecessary expenses and duplication of functions, and to promote uniform and effective administration of relocation assistance programs, utilize the services of other agencies having an established organization to manage and implement relocation assistance programs. In October of 2012 the Board entered into an agreement with Paragon Partners LLC to provide acquisition and relocation services. Paragon Partners LLC recently completed the appraisal process on several properties and presented offers to those property owners. Today's item presents an accepted offer for the following property: APN 004-010-04 & 004-013-18, 755 & 737 E State Highway 20, Upper Lake: The 115.25 acre property has a 49 acre vineyard and vacant land (formerly vineyard) and is owned by Robinson Lake Vineyard LLC. The fair market value is $1,510,000 as established by an independent fee appraisal and review by the State of California, Department of Water Resources, Real Estate Division. This acquisition is fully funded by the DWR Grant. The northern portion of the property (approximately 40 acres) is outside of the Project boundaries. Staff is investigating options for this portion of the property. Attached as Exhibit "A" is a vicinity map showing the location of the subject property. This acquisition is necessary for the purpose of flood control protection as provided in the State of California Water Code Section 79037, Division 26, Chapter 5, Article 2.5. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chair to sign the real property purchase contract along with instructions to the Clerk to certify the grant deed for recordation. The grant deed will be recorded by a Title guarantee company upon the Board's acceptance. To minimize reproduction costs, the original documents are attached to the Clerk's copy of the original cover memo and only a copy of this memo is furnished for each individual Board member. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None X__Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $1,510,000 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chair to sign the real property purchase contract along with instructions to the Clerk to certify the grant deed for recordation. The grant deed will be recorded by a Title guarantee company upon the Board's acceptance.
On motion of Director Steele, and by vote of the Board, approved the Purchase Agreement for Property located at 755 & 737 E. State Hwy 20, Upper Lake (APN 004-010-04 & 004-013-18), in the amount of $1,510,000 which is fully funded by CDWR grant funds for the Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecoysytem Restoration Project, and authorized the Chair to sign, and authorized the Clerk of the Board to certify the grant deed for recordation. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Water Resources Director Scott DeLeon presented the item to the Board. Chair Farrington asked if anyone wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.6Consideration of Continuing the Proclamation of a Local Emergency Due to Drought Conditions Action Item approved — Pass
Carried 4-0 — moved by Brown (recovered from the archived minutes)
Brown: aye Comstock: absent Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: July 9, 2015 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Marisa Chilafoe, Emergency Services Manager · Subject: Continuing the Proclamation of a Local Emergency Due To Drought Conditions

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On March 4, 2014, your board proclaimed a local emergency, continuing the emergency thirteen times, and on June 23, 2015, your board proclaimed a continued local emergency due to ongoing drought conditions. Pursuant to State law, your Board is required to review the status of the declared emergency every 30 days. As your board is aware, the severity of this year's drought became apparent as our community water systems, private wells and natural resources struggled to maintain adequate water supply, was complicated by the extreme effects of the lake's algae, the County saw impacts to local agriculture and has brought about extreme fire danger county-wide. Lake County remains one of 55 California counties to be declared a primary natural disaster area due to drought damages and losses by the U.S. Department of Agriculture ("USDA"). Such declaration makes all qualified farm operators eligible for low interest emergency loans from the USDA's Farm Service Agency. Though local water rights curtailments have been lifted, the compliance order in place for Hidden Valley Lake's Community Service District ("CSD") remains in place until the CSD can address its junior water rights. In addition, several additional local water districts are either seeking or in the process of receiving grant funding to mitigate system issues related to the drought. Lake OES continues to work with local water districts, the State Water Resources Control Board, the State Department of Water Resources and the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services ("Cal OES") regarding potential funding and solutions. Given the circumstances, the County continues to seek State or Federal assistance for impacted systems as drought conditions persist and weather forecasts predict continued drought conditions. Therefore, continuing the declaration of an emergency and maintaining a proactive approach to drought response is critical for area water purveyors in maintaining the health and safety of their customers - Lake County residents and tourists - and protecting our local economy. Continuing the declaration of an emergency is also required to allow the County to seek funding specifically designated for drought relief purposes, and other assistance that might be required. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board extend the Proclamation of a Local Emergency due to drought conditions.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Marisa Chilafoe, Emergency Services Manager DATE: July 9, 2015 SUBJECT: Continuing the Proclamation of a Local Emergency Due To Drought Conditions EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On March 4, 2014, your board proclaimed a local emergency, continuing the emergency thirteen times, and on June 23, 2015, your board proclaimed a continued local emergency due to ongoing drought conditions. Pursuant to State law, your Board is required to review the status of the declared emergency every 30 days. As your board is aware, the severity of this year's drought became apparent as our community water systems, private wells and natural resources struggled to maintain adequate water supply, was complicated by the extreme effects of the lake's algae, the County saw impacts to local agriculture and has brought about extreme fire danger county-wide. Lake County remains one of 55 California counties to be declared a primary natural disaster area due to drought damages and losses by the U.S. Department of Agriculture ("USDA"). Such declaration makes all qualified farm operators eligible for low interest emergency loans from the USDA's Farm Service Agency. Though local water rights curtailments have been lifted, the compliance order in place for Hidden Valley Lake's Community Service District ("CSD") remains in place until the CSD can address its junior water rights. In addition, several additional local water districts are either seeking or in the process of receiving grant funding to mitigate system issues related to the drought. Lake OES continues to work with local water districts, the State Water Resources Control Board, the State Department of Water Resources and the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services ("Cal OES") regarding potential funding and solutions. Given the circumstances, the County continues to seek State or Federal assistance for impacted systems as drought conditions persist and weather forecasts predict continued drought conditions. Therefore, continuing the declaration of an emergency and maintaining a proactive approach to drought response is critical for area water purveyors in maintaining the health and safety of their customers - Lake County residents and tourists - and protecting our local economy. Continuing the declaration of an emergency is also required to allow the County to seek funding specifically designated for drought relief purposes, and other assistance that might be required. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board extend the Proclamation of a Local Emergency due to drought conditions.
On motion of Supervisor Brown, and by vote of the Board, extended the Proclamation of a Local Emergency due to drought conditions. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Emergency Services Manager Marisa Chilafoe presented the item to the Board. Chair Farrington asked if anyone wished to speak. No one present wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.

10. Closed Session

10.1Conference with Labor Negotiator: (a) County Negotiators: A. Grant, S. Harry, M. Perry, J. DeHaan, K. Ferguson and S. Jansen; (b) Employee Organizations: DDAA, DSA, LCCOA, LCEA and LCSEA
10.2Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(1): Lakeside Heights HOA v. County of Lake Closed Session Item
Clerk’s notes: The Board reconvened into Regular Session at 12:43 p.m. having taken no action.

11. Adjournment