Lake County Meetings — interactive archive

Board Of Supervisors — Tuesday, July 19, 2016

9:00 AM · Board Chambers

Approved minutes (PDF)

1. Call to Order

2. Moment of Silence

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Presentation of Animals at the Animal Care and Control Shelter

5. Consideration of Items Not Appearing on the Posted Agenda (Extra Items)

6. Current Construction Projects - Contract Change Orders

7. Approval of the Consent Agenda

7.1Adopt Resolution Approving the 2016 Lake County Funding Application, in the Amount of $200,000, to the Economic Development Administration to Implement the 2016 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS). Resolution pulled on consent Adopted — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: July 19, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Carol J. Huchingson, County Administrative Officer · Subject: Adopt Resolution Approving the 2016 Lake County Funding Application, in the Amount of $200,000, to the Economic Development Administration to Implement the 2016 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received and approved Lake County's Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) and has invited Lake County to apply for a grant, in the amount of $200,000 to help fund the implementation of the CEDS strategy work plan for a two-year period. The work plan can be modified over time by the County, in cooperation with EDA, as the need arises. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $40,000 over 2 years Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): If the grant is funded, EDA requires a local match from the County, in the amount of $40,000, over a two year period. County contracted funds for economic development services can be applied as in-kind match. Additional in-kind match from the Cities of Clearlake ($2,500) and Lakeport ($5,000) will be made through each jurisdiction's contributions to the Lake County Economic Development Corporation. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Approving the 2016 Lake County Funding Application, in the Amount of $200,000, to the Economic Development Administration to Implement the 2016 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS). Thank you for your consideration.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Carol J. Huchingson, County Administrative Officer DATE: July 19, 2016 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Approving the 2016 Lake County Funding Application, in the Amount of $200,000, to the Economic Development Administration to Implement the 2016 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received and approved Lake County's Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) and has invited Lake County to apply for a grant, in the amount of $200,000 to help fund the implementation of the CEDS strategy work plan for a two-year period. The work plan can be modified over time by the County, in cooperation with EDA, as the need arises. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $40,000 over 2 years Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): If the grant is funded, EDA requires a local match from the County, in the amount of $40,000, over a two year period. County contracted funds for economic development services can be applied as in-kind match. Additional in-kind match from the Cities of Clearlake ($2,500) and Lakeport ($5,000) will be made through each jurisdiction's contributions to the Lake County Economic Development Corporation. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Approving the 2016 Lake County Funding Application, in the Amount of $200,000, to the Economic Development Administration to Implement the 2016 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS). Thank you for your consideration.
Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: County Administrative Officer Carol Huchingson presented the item to the Board. Community Development Services President Jeff Lucas was also present and spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
7.2Approve Minutes from the Board of Supervisors meeting held on June 7, 2016 and June 14, 2016. Report passed on consent
7.3Adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Grant Project - County Victim Services Program and Authorize the Chair to Sign the Certification of Assurance of Compliance for a Grant Application in the amount of $197,121 for a two year period retroactive to July 1, 2016. Action Item passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: July 5, 2016 · To: The Honorable Members of the Lake County Board of Supervisors · From: Don A. Anderson, District Attorney · Subject: Adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Grant Project - County Victim Services Program and Authorize the Chair to Sign the Certification of Assurance of Compliance for a Grant Application in the amount of $197,121 for a two year period retroactive to July 1, 2016.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) has offered a one-time, two-year grant opportunity to each of California's 58 counties and the City of Los Angeles. Cal OES recognizes that there are unmet gaps/needs at the county level in regards to providing direct services to victims of crime. The purpose of this grant is to identify these unmet gaps/needs in victim services and develop a plan to meet these gaps/needs. The grant application for the County Victim Services Program is in the amount of $197,121 plus a match requirement of $49,280 for the two-year period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018. Although the application states that this is a one-time grant, Cal OES expects this grant to be funded and extended for an additional two years. If awarded, this grant will fund a full-time permanent Victim Advocate, part of the Victim Witness Program Administrator, and other operating expenses used to achieve the Grant Project goals. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Although the Grant would fund a full-time Victim Advocate and part of the Victim Witness Program Administrator, an additional full-time Victim Advocate would have to be hired. The current full-time Victim Advocates are already funded either 100% or partially by the Victim Witness Assistance Grant. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): If awarded, the additional full-time Victim Advocate would be filling the vacant Victim Advocate position. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Grant Project - County Victim Services Program and Authorize the Chair to Sign the Certification of Assurance of Compliance for a Grant Application in the amount of $197,121 for a two year period retroactive to July 1, 2016.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Members of the Lake County Board of Supervisors FROM: Don A. Anderson, District Attorney DATE: July 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Grant Project - County Victim Services Program and Authorize the Chair to Sign the Certification of Assurance of Compliance for a Grant Application in the amount of $197,121 for a two year period retroactive to July 1, 2016. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) has offered a one-time, two-year grant opportunity to each of California's 58 counties and the City of Los Angeles. Cal OES recognizes that there are unmet gaps/needs at the county level in regards to providing direct services to victims of crime. The purpose of this grant is to identify these unmet gaps/needs in victim services and develop a plan to meet these gaps/needs. The grant application for the County Victim Services Program is in the amount of $197,121 plus a match requirement of $49,280 for the two-year period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018. Although the application states that this is a one-time grant, Cal OES expects this grant to be funded and extended for an additional two years. If awarded, this grant will fund a full-time permanent Victim Advocate, part of the Victim Witness Program Administrator, and other operating expenses used to achieve the Grant Project goals. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Although the Grant would fund a full-time Victim Advocate and part of the Victim Witness Program Administrator, an additional full-time Victim Advocate would have to be hired. The current full-time Victim Advocates are already funded either 100% or partially by the Victim Witness Assistance Grant. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): If awarded, the additional full-time Victim Advocate would be filling the vacant Victim Advocate position. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Grant Project - County Victim Services Program and Authorize the Chair to Sign the Certification of Assurance of Compliance for a Grant Application in the amount of $197,121 for a two year period retroactive to July 1, 2016.
7.4(a) Waive the formal bidding process, per Ordinance #2406, Purchasing Code 38.2, as it is not in the public interest due to the unique nature of goods or services; and (b) Approve License Agreement, Software support and Maintenance Agreement with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 and authorize the Sheriff to sign. Action Item passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: June 13, 2016 · To: Rob Brown, Chairman, Board of Supervisors · From: Brian L. Martin, Sheriff/Coroner · Subject: (a) Waive the formal bidding process, per Ordinance #2406, Purchasing Code 38.2, as it is not in the public interest due to the unique nature of goods or services; and (b) Approve License Agreement, Software support and Maintenance Agreement with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 and authorize the Sheriff to sign.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Lake County Sheriff's Department requests Your Boards' approval of the attached "License Agreement" with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc, Inc. LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc, provides an on-line reporting software that is internet based. This allows the public to file reports electronically, rather than by contacting the Central Dispatch office and asking that a Deputy Sheriff be dispatched to the reporting parties location. This system has been used in the past under the name of Coplogic. Due to staffing issues, it has been determined this type of on-line system will assist both the public and department in filing reports. Cost of the software totals $20,000. We request your Board waive the competitive bidding process of the County's purchasing ordinance, under section b (exemptions from competitive bidding) as it is not in the public interest due to the unique nature of goods or services. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted _x_Non-Budgeted Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): 7,500 FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Payment to be made from the Sheriff/Coroner budget 2201, object code 17.00. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action Approval of License Agreement, Software support and Maintenance Agreement with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc, RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Sheriff's Department recommends (a) Waive the formal bidding process, per Ordinance #2406, Purchasing Code 38.2, as it is not in the public interest due to the unique nature of goods or services; and (b) Approve License Agreement, Software support and Maintenance Agreement with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 and authorize the Sheriff to sign.

No additional funding requested — the memo's cost fields were left blank, which on this form means the item is already budgeted.

Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Rob Brown, Chairman, Board of Supervisors FROM: Brian L. Martin, Sheriff/Coroner DATE: June 13, 2016 SUBJECT: (a) Waive the formal bidding process, per Ordinance #2406, Purchasing Code 38.2, as it is not in the public interest due to the unique nature of goods or services; and (b) Approve License Agreement, Software support and Maintenance Agreement with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 and authorize the Sheriff to sign. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Lake County Sheriff's Department requests Your Boards' approval of the attached "License Agreement" with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc, Inc. LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc, provides an on-line reporting software that is internet based. This allows the public to file reports electronically, rather than by contacting the Central Dispatch office and asking that a Deputy Sheriff be dispatched to the reporting parties location. This system has been used in the past under the name of Coplogic. Due to staffing issues, it has been determined this type of on-line system will assist both the public and department in filing reports. Cost of the software totals $20,000. We request your Board waive the competitive bidding process of the County's purchasing ordinance, under section b (exemptions from competitive bidding) as it is not in the public interest due to the unique nature of goods or services. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted _x_Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: 20,000 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): 7,500 FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Payment to be made from the Sheriff/Coroner budget 2201, object code 17.00. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action Approval of License Agreement, Software support and Maintenance Agreement with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc, RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Sheriff's Department recommends (a) Waive the formal bidding process, per Ordinance #2406, Purchasing Code 38.2, as it is not in the public interest due to the unique nature of goods or services; and (b) Approve License Agreement, Software support and Maintenance Agreement with LexisNexis Claims Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 and authorize the Sheriff to sign.
7.5Approve Amendments #8 and #9 between the County of Lake and Sun Ridge Systems, Inc. for the installation of both In Station and Mobile Mapping and Mobile Software in the total amount of $97,857, to be paid from Budget 2206, object code 28.30 and authorize Chair to sign. Action Item pulled on consent
Staff memo

Date: July 5, 2016 · To: Rob Brown, Chairman, Board of Supervisors · From: Brian L. Martin, Sheriff/Coroner · Subject: Approve (a) Contract Amendments #8 and #9 between the County of Lake and Sun Ridge Systems, Inc. for the installation of both In Station and Mobile Mapping and Mobile Software in the total amount of $97,857 and authorize payment of $78,000 to be paid from Budget 2206, object code 62.74 and $19,857 to be paid from object code 28.30 and authorize Chair to sign, and (b) approve the attached budget transfer supporting these payments from FY 2015/16

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Sheriff's Office is requesting your Boards' approval to amend our current contract with Sun Ridge Systems for the purchase of an additional module. Amendment #8 and #9 is for the purchase and installation of RIMS In Station and Mobile Mapping Software and RIMS Mobile Software. This software is required for the recently installed Mobile Data Terminal's (MDT's). The purchase was approved by Your Board on November 3, 2015; however a contract amendment has been requested in order for payment to be processed. Attached are copies of the 8th and 9th Contract amendments with Sun Ridge as well as a copy of the Board memo dated October 10, 2015. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _x_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Payment will be made from the Sheriff/Rural Sheriff's budget 2206, object code 28.30 with the actual software licensing to be paid from object code 62.74. There is no cost to the County. Funds were allocated in FY 2015/16. A budget transfer in the amount of $78,000 is attached, moving monies from 28.30 to 62.74. This purchased was approved in FY 2015/16, and as funds were encumbered and a purchase order issued, payment will be retro to FY 2015/16. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Sheriff's Department recommends approval of (a) Contract Amendments #8 and #9 between the County of Lake and Sun Ridge Systems, Inc. for the installation of both In Station and Mobile Mapping and Mobile Software in the total amount of $97,857 and authorize payment of $78,000 to be paid from Budget 2206, object code 62.74 and $19,857 to be paid from object code 28.30 and authorize Chair to sign, and (b) approve the attached budget transfer supporting these payments from FY 2015/16.

No additional funding requested — the memo's cost fields were left blank, which on this form means the item is already budgeted.

Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Rob Brown, Chairman, Board of Supervisors FROM: Brian L. Martin, Sheriff/Coroner DATE: July 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve (a) Contract Amendments #8 and #9 between the County of Lake and Sun Ridge Systems, Inc. for the installation of both In Station and Mobile Mapping and Mobile Software in the total amount of $97,857 and authorize payment of $78,000 to be paid from Budget 2206, object code 62.74 and $19,857 to be paid from object code 28.30 and authorize Chair to sign, and (b) approve the attached budget transfer supporting these payments from FY 2015/16 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Sheriff's Office is requesting your Boards' approval to amend our current contract with Sun Ridge Systems for the purchase of an additional module. Amendment #8 and #9 is for the purchase and installation of RIMS In Station and Mobile Mapping Software and RIMS Mobile Software. This software is required for the recently installed Mobile Data Terminal's (MDT's). The purchase was approved by Your Board on November 3, 2015; however a contract amendment has been requested in order for payment to be processed. Attached are copies of the 8th and 9th Contract amendments with Sun Ridge as well as a copy of the Board memo dated October 10, 2015. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _x_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $97,857 Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Payment will be made from the Sheriff/Rural Sheriff's budget 2206, object code 28.30 with the actual software licensing to be paid from object code 62.74. There is no cost to the County. Funds were allocated in FY 2015/16. A budget transfer in the amount of $78,000 is attached, moving monies from 28.30 to 62.74. This purchased was approved in FY 2015/16, and as funds were encumbered and a purchase order issued, payment will be retro to FY 2015/16. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Sheriff's Department recommends approval of (a) Contract Amendments #8 and #9 between the County of Lake and Sun Ridge Systems, Inc. for the installation of both In Station and Mobile Mapping and Mobile Software in the total amount of $97,857 and authorize payment of $78,000 to be paid from Budget 2206, object code 62.74 and $19,857 to be paid from object code 28.30 and authorize Chair to sign, and (b) approve the attached budget transfer supporting these payments from FY 2015/16.
Clerk’s notes: Item 7.5 was pulled and moved to a later date.
7.6(Sitting as the Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for an Aquatic Conservation Grant with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the amount of $141,475.62 Resolution passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: July 6, 2016 · To: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District · From: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director · Subject: (Sitting as the Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for an Aquatic Conservation Grant with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the amount of $141,475.62

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is requesting the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District (District) adopt a resolution authorizing the Water Resources Director to file a grant application and execute a grant agreement with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. This item is not anticipated to be controversial; therefore we are requesting this item be placed on the consent agenda. The Lake County Watershed Protection District (LCWPD) proposes funding a project in the amount of $141,475.62 to achieve two tasks: 1. Creation of an Online Story Map 2. Development of a Model Reciprocal Vessel Certification Program Grant funds are reimbursable with no match required but encouraged. If awarded, the Department has committed to a contribution of $4,414.65, which will be contributed as staff time working on the project. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Resolution authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to file Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for a for a United States Fish and Wildlife Service Aquatic Conservation Grant. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Grant funds are reimbursable with no match required but encouraged. If awarded, the Department has committed to a contribution of $4,414.65, which will be contributed as staff time working on the project. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting as the Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for an Aquatic Conservation Grant with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the amount of $141,475.62
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District FROM: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director DATE: July 6, 2016 SUBJECT: (Sitting as the Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for an Aquatic Conservation Grant with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the amount of $141,475.62 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is requesting the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District (District) adopt a resolution authorizing the Water Resources Director to file a grant application and execute a grant agreement with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. This item is not anticipated to be controversial; therefore we are requesting this item be placed on the consent agenda. The Lake County Watershed Protection District (LCWPD) proposes funding a project in the amount of $141,475.62 to achieve two tasks: 1. Creation of an Online Story Map 2. Development of a Model Reciprocal Vessel Certification Program Grant funds are reimbursable with no match required but encouraged. If awarded, the Department has committed to a contribution of $4,414.65, which will be contributed as staff time working on the project. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Resolution authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to file Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for a for a United States Fish and Wildlife Service Aquatic Conservation Grant. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Grant funds are reimbursable with no match required but encouraged. If awarded, the Department has committed to a contribution of $4,414.65, which will be contributed as staff time working on the project. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting as the Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) Adopt Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for an Aquatic Conservation Grant with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the amount of $141,475.62
7.7(a) Approve Administrative Encroachment Permit #16-22 (closure located at the City of Lakeport's Library Park, approximately 800 feet offshore and extended for approximately 1 mile) for the Hot Car and Boat Show August 12- 14, 2016 and Authorize the Water Resources Director to sign the permit; and (b) Waive the Encroachment Permit fee of $665 in light of the positive economic benefit the event will bring to the County. Action Item passed on consent approved — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: July 6, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director · Subject: Approve Administrative Encroachment Permit #16-22 for the Hot Car and Boat Show and Waive the Encroachment Permit fee of $665 in light of the positive economic benefit the event will bring to the County.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Local businessman, Tony Barthel, will be hosting this second annual event at the City of Lakeport's Library Park on August 12th-14th, 2016. According to the event organizers, this year is expected to draw hundreds of cars and boats. For the boat participants, the organizers would like to provide a closed area to allow the boats to make high-speed passes. We have met with the organizers as well as the Sheriff's Boat Patrol and officials from the City of Lakeport and we concur that a marked-off course will help provide a safe area in which to operate and observe these specialized boats. This event will require your Board to authorize the closure of that portion of the lake situated approximately 800 feet offshore from the park and extend for approximately 1mile in a northerly direction as approximated on the attached map. Your Board has the authority to grant this temporary closure pursuant to Section 11.3 of Chapter 23 of the Clear Lake Shoreline Ordinance. This Ordinance allows your Board to authorize a closure if it finds that the proposed uses are appropriate but require special regulations or separation from other uses. In light of the scope of this event and the risks inherent therein, staff believes that this event meets those tests. Recommendations 1. Staff recommends that your Board approves such a closure in accordance with the Administrative Encroachment Permit, which is attached hereto for your consideration and Authorize the Water Resources Director to sign the permit; and, 2. Waive the Encroachment Permit fee of $665.00 in light of the positive economic benefit the event will bring to the County. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that your Board (a) Approve Administrative Encroachment Permit #16-22 (closure located at the City of Lakeport's Library Park, approximately 800 feet offshore and extended for approximately 1 mile) for the Hot Car and Boat Show August 12- 14, 2016 and Authorize the Water Resources Director to sign the permit; and (b) Waive the Encroachment Permit fee of $665 in light of the positive economic benefit the event will bring to the County.

No additional funding requested — the memo's cost fields were left blank, which on this form means the item is already budgeted.

Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director DATE: July 6, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve Administrative Encroachment Permit #16-22 for the Hot Car and Boat Show and Waive the Encroachment Permit fee of $665 in light of the positive economic benefit the event will bring to the County. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Local businessman, Tony Barthel, will be hosting this second annual event at the City of Lakeport's Library Park on August 12th-14th, 2016. According to the event organizers, this year is expected to draw hundreds of cars and boats. For the boat participants, the organizers would like to provide a closed area to allow the boats to make high-speed passes. We have met with the organizers as well as the Sheriff's Boat Patrol and officials from the City of Lakeport and we concur that a marked-off course will help provide a safe area in which to operate and observe these specialized boats. This event will require your Board to authorize the closure of that portion of the lake situated approximately 800 feet offshore from the park and extend for approximately 1mile in a northerly direction as approximated on the attached map. Your Board has the authority to grant this temporary closure pursuant to Section 11.3 of Chapter 23 of the Clear Lake Shoreline Ordinance. This Ordinance allows your Board to authorize a closure if it finds that the proposed uses are appropriate but require special regulations or separation from other uses. In light of the scope of this event and the risks inherent therein, staff believes that this event meets those tests. Recommendations 1. Staff recommends that your Board approves such a closure in accordance with the Administrative Encroachment Permit, which is attached hereto for your consideration and Authorize the Water Resources Director to sign the permit; and, 2. Waive the Encroachment Permit fee of $665.00 in light of the positive economic benefit the event will bring to the County. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that your Board (a) Approve Administrative Encroachment Permit #16-22 (closure located at the City of Lakeport's Library Park, approximately 800 feet offshore and extended for approximately 1 mile) for the Hot Car and Boat Show August 12- 14, 2016 and Authorize the Water Resources Director to sign the permit; and (b) Waive the Encroachment Permit fee of $665 in light of the positive economic benefit the event will bring to the County.
On motion of Supervosir Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved Consent Agenda Items 7.1 through 7.7, with the exception of 7.1 and 7.5. The motion carried by the following vote:

8. Timed Items

8.19:05 A.M. - Public Input
Clerk’s notes: No public input.
8.29:15 A.M. - Informational Report on 26th Annual Konocti Challenge Bike Race Report
Staff memo

Date: July 19, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Carol J. Huchingson, County Administrative Officer · Subject: Informational Report on 26th Annual Konocti Challenge Bike Race

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Konocti Challenge Race Director Jennifer Strong will provide a brief report on this upcoming event. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): None STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Informational only
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Carol J. Huchingson, County Administrative Officer DATE: July 19, 2016 SUBJECT: Informational Report on 26th Annual Konocti Challenge Bike Race EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Konocti Challenge Race Director Jennifer Strong will provide a brief report on this upcoming event. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): None STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Informational only
Clerk’s notes: Konocti Challenge Ride Director Jennifer Strong presented the item to the Board and gave a PowerPoint presentation on the event. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.39:30 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING - (Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA#3, 6, 7, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of (a) Resolution Confirming Collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees; and (d) Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District. Public Hearing Adopted
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: June 6, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Jan Coppinger, Special Districts Administrator Josefine Ecklor, Fiscal Officer Marcy Harrison, Accountant II · Subject: PUBLIC HEARING-(Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA#3, #6, #7, #13, #16, #18, #20, #21, #22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors)-Consideration of (a) Resolution Confirming Collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees; and (d) Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 19, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. a PUBLIC HEARING will be held to hear protests regarding the placement of Lighting Fees and Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees on the 2016-2017 Tax Rolls for collection. Resolutions, once approved by your Board, authorize this action in accordance with Section 55501 of the Water Code, and Sections 25215.4 and 25215.5 of the Government Code. The required Resolutions are attached. The authorization by your Board for placement of the Delinquent Sewer Fees is accomplished by motion of one of the Board members, in accordance with Section 25214.4 of the Government Code. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: N/A Amount Budgeted: N/A Additional Requested: N.A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/AA FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Collection of Annual Lighting Fees and Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA#3, 6, 7, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors)-Consideration of (a) Resolution Confirming Collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees; and (d) Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Jan Coppinger, Special Districts Administrator Josefine Ecklor, Fiscal Officer Marcy Harrison, Accountant II DATE: June 6, 2016 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING-(Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA#3, #6, #7, #13, #16, #18, #20, #21, #22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors)-Consideration of (a) Resolution Confirming Collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees; and (d) Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On July 19, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. a PUBLIC HEARING will be held to hear protests regarding the placement of Lighting Fees and Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees on the 2016-2017 Tax Rolls for collection. Resolutions, once approved by your Board, authorize this action in accordance with Section 55501 of the Water Code, and Sections 25215.4 and 25215.5 of the Government Code. The required Resolutions are attached. The authorization by your Board for placement of the Delinquent Sewer Fees is accomplished by motion of one of the Board members, in accordance with Section 25214.4 of the Government Code. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: N/A Amount Budgeted: N/A Additional Requested: N.A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/AA FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Collection of Annual Lighting Fees and Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting concurrently as Clearlake Keys CSA#1, CSA#3, 6, 7, 13, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, Kelseyville County Water Works District #3, and Lake County Sanitation District, Board of Directors)-Consideration of (a) Resolution Confirming Collections of Annual Lighting Fees; (b) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water Fees; (c) Resolution Confirming Collections of Delinquent Water and Sewer Fees; and (d) Resolution of Delinquent Sewer Fees for Lake County Sanitation District.
(a) Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote (5 ayes): Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock (b) Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote (5 ayes): Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock (c) Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote (5 ayes): Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock (d) Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote (5 ayes): Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock
Clerk’s notes: Special Districts Administrator Jan Coppinger presented the item to the Board. Deputy Fiscal Administrator Josefine Eckler and Accountant Marci Harrison were present and spoke. Customer Services Coordinator Jill Shaul was also present. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following person spoke: Raymond Choy. No one else wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.49:45 A.M. – Consideration of Resolution of the Lake County Board of Supervisors Establishing the Cobb Municipal Advisory Council Resolution Adopted, as amended — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: July 14, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Rob Brown, Chairman · Subject: 9:45 A.M. - Consideration of Resolution of the Lake County Board of Supervisors Establishing the Cobb Municipal Advisory Council

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I respectfully request the Board adopt a new Community Advisory Committee for the purpose of advising the Board on planning, emergency preparedness, response and public safety, and local infrastructure that have the potential to affect the Cobb area. This Committee will be known as Cobb Municipal Advisory Council and shall represent the Boggs/Loch Lomond/Cobb Mountain area. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution of the Lake County Board of Supervisors Establishing the Cobb Municipal Advisory Council.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Rob Brown, Chairman DATE: July 14, 2016 SUBJECT: 9:45 A.M. - Consideration of Resolution of the Lake County Board of Supervisors Establishing the Cobb Municipal Advisory Council EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I respectfully request the Board adopt a new Community Advisory Committee for the purpose of advising the Board on planning, emergency preparedness, response and public safety, and local infrastructure that have the potential to affect the Cobb area. This Committee will be known as Cobb Municipal Advisory Council and shall represent the Boggs/Loch Lomond/Cobb Mountain area. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution of the Lake County Board of Supervisors Establishing the Cobb Municipal Advisory Council.
(a) Supervisor Brown offered the Resolution as amended and passed by roll call vote (5 ayes): Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock (b) On motion of Supervisor Brown, and by vote of the Board, appointed the following Board Members: Gary Prather, Jessica Pyska, Eliot Hurwitz, Jessyka Lytel and Barbara Flynn.
Clerk’s notes: Eliott Hurwitz presented the item to the Board. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following people spoke: Tom Slate, Fletcher Thornton and Jessyka Lyttle. No one else wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed. Chair Brown passed the gavel for the vote.
8.510:00 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING (Continued from June 14, 2016 and May 24, 2016) Consideration of Appeal (AB 16-02) of Planning Commission's Denial of Major Use Permit (UP 15-08, IS 15-10) and Mitigated Negative Declaration to allow construction of a 9,100 square foot Dollar General Store; Appellant is Cross Development, LLC; project located at 20900 State Highway 29, Middletown (APN 024-301-18) Public Hearing approved — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott DeLeon, Interim Community Development Director Prepared by: Michalyn DelValle, Senior Planner · Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Major Use Permit (UP 15-09) for Dollar General Store, Middletown; AB 16-02 APN 024-501-18 Supervisor District 1

EXHIBITS: A. Appeal Form B. Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated April 28, 2016 C. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated April 18, 2016 I. BACKGROUND The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission's April 28, 2016 unanimous decision to deny Major Use Permit (UP 15-09) to allow construction of an approximately 9,100 square foot general retail store (Dollar General) at 20900 S. State Highway 29, Middletown. The store is proposed to be located across S. Highway 29 from the Middletown High School on a parcel zoned for retail uses (C1-DR-FF-FW-SC-WW). The timely appeal (BOS Exhibit A) was filed by Joe Dell, Cross Development who is in disagreement with the Planning Commissions comments and reasons for the Denial. The Planning Commission hearing was held on April 28th and lasted approximately 2 hours and 14 minutes. The hearing was well attended and seventeen citizens spoke against the project. A total of nineteen letters from the public were received against the project. A summary of the public's concerns (See EXHIBIT B) included: * The potential impacts that the approval of a Dollar General may have on local businesses; * The proposed design of the building was not in compliance with the Middletown Design Guidelines; * That the Dollar General store does not fit the character of the area; * That as a gateway community to the County for Napa Wine Valley visitors it is important to uphold the commercial main street character; * That the proposed commercial building would be backed up to homes that are now gone, and would further discourage owners from rebuilding; and, * That a strip commercial chain store was not in keeping with the Middletown Area Plans vision for the community of unique, local and "home-grown" businesses. II. APPEAL DISCUSSION The appeal form (BOS Exhibit A) submitted by the applicant disagrees with the comments made during the hearing and the decision to deny the Major Use Permit made by the Planning Commission. After more than 2 hours of public testimony, the Planning Commission denied the Major Use Permit expressing a variety of concerns: that the proposed store is too close to a school and kids do not have a safe way to cross Highway 29; the potential economic impacts that a discount general store may have on the local economy and businesses that are currently struggling to survive in the aftermath of the Valley Fire; and that as the first new commercial building to come forward after the adoption of the Area Plan it is important that they make sure to follow the plan policies and design guidelines. Concern was expressed over the message this type of new commercial development would be sending to other would be investors, especially during the recovery and rebuilding process that may be documented and reported for the nation to follow. Economic impacts of a project are not typically part of the environmental review for CEQA Initial Study (California Environmental Quality Act). However, it was mentioned during the hearing that several businesses may have already been affected economically by the recent Valley Fire, and Major Use findings address "the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare" of the neighboring community and the County of Lake as a whole. The applicant submitted a revision to the project after staff discussions concerning building elevations and bringing the building into conformance with the Middletown Area Plan. A third revision to the proposed building elevation was presented by the applicant during the Planning Commission hearing. Some members of the public agreed that the elevation presented at the public hearing was more in keeping with the Design Guidelines of Middletown. ..Recommended Action Sample Motions: Appeal Denial I move that the Board of Supervisors make an intended decision to deny Appeal AB 16-02 and uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 15-08 and associated mitigated negative declaration, for Cross Development, on behalf of Dollar General. Appeal Approval I move that the Board of Supervisors make an intended decision to grant approval of Appeal AB 16-02, and overturn the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 15-08, and associated mitigated negative declaration, for Cross Development, on behalf of Dollar General, and further direct staff to work with Cross Development on building and site refinements to address community design concerns.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott DeLeon, Interim Community Development Director Prepared by: Michalyn DelValle, Senior Planner DATE: May 24, 2016 SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Major Use Permit (UP 15-09) for Dollar General Store, Middletown; AB 16-02 APN 024-501-18 Supervisor District 1 EXHIBITS: A. Appeal Form B. Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated April 28, 2016 C. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated April 18, 2016 I. BACKGROUND The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission's April 28, 2016 unanimous decision to deny Major Use Permit (UP 15-09) to allow construction of an approximately 9,100 square foot general retail store (Dollar General) at 20900 S. State Highway 29, Middletown. The store is proposed to be located across S. Highway 29 from the Middletown High School on a parcel zoned for retail uses (C1-DR-FF-FW-SC-WW). The timely appeal (BOS Exhibit A) was filed by Joe Dell, Cross Development who is in disagreement with the Planning Commissions comments and reasons for the Denial. The Planning Commission hearing was held on April 28th and lasted approximately 2 hours and 14 minutes. The hearing was well attended and seventeen citizens spoke against the project. A total of nineteen letters from the public were received against the project. A summary of the public's concerns (See EXHIBIT B) included: * The potential impacts that the approval of a Dollar General may have on local businesses; * The proposed design of the building was not in compliance with the Middletown Design Guidelines; * That the Dollar General store does not fit the character of the area; * That as a gateway community to the County for Napa Wine Valley visitors it is important to uphold the commercial main street character; * That the proposed commercial building would be backed up to homes that are now gone, and would further discourage owners from rebuilding; and, * That a strip commercial chain store was not in keeping with the Middletown Area Plans vision for the community of unique, local and "home-grown" businesses. II. APPEAL DISCUSSION The appeal form (BOS Exhibit A) submitted by the applicant disagrees with the comments made during the hearing and the decision to deny the Major Use Permit made by the Planning Commission. After more than 2 hours of public testimony, the Planning Commission denied the Major Use Permit expressing a variety of concerns: that the proposed store is too close to a school and kids do not have a safe way to cross Highway 29; the potential economic impacts that a discount general store may have on the local economy and businesses that are currently struggling to survive in the aftermath of the Valley Fire; and that as the first new commercial building to come forward after the adoption of the Area Plan it is important that they make sure to follow the plan policies and design guidelines. Concern was expressed over the message this type of new commercial development would be sending to other would be investors, especially during the recovery and rebuilding process that may be documented and reported for the nation to follow. Economic impacts of a project are not typically part of the environmental review for CEQA Initial Study (California Environmental Quality Act). However, it was mentioned during the hearing that several businesses may have already been affected economically by the recent Valley Fire, and Major Use findings address "the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare" of the neighboring community and the County of Lake as a whole. The applicant submitted a revision to the project after staff discussions concerning building elevations and bringing the building into conformance with the Middletown Area Plan. A third revision to the proposed building elevation was presented by the applicant during the Planning Commission hearing. Some members of the public agreed that the elevation presented at the public hearing was more in keeping with the Design Guidelines of Middletown. ..Recommended Action Sample Motions: Appeal Denial I move that the Board of Supervisors make an intended decision to deny Appeal AB 16-02 and uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 15-08 and associated mitigated negative declaration, for Cross Development, on behalf of Dollar General. Appeal Approval I move that the Board of Supervisors make an intended decision to grant approval of Appeal AB 16-02, and overturn the Planning Commission's denial of Use Permit 15-08, and associated mitigated negative declaration, for Cross Development, on behalf of Dollar General, and further direct staff to work with Cross Development on building and site refinements to address community design concerns.
On motion of Supervisor Comstock and by vote of the Board, approved to overturn the decision and grant the Appeal (AB 16-02) of Planning Commission's Denial of Major Use Permit (UP 15-08, IS 15-10) and Mitigated Negative Declaration to allow construction of a 9,100 square foot Dollar General Store; Appellant is Cross Development, LLC; project located at 20900 State Highway 29, Middletown (APN 024-301-18). The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Community Development Principal Planner Audrey Knight and Senior Planner Michalyn DelValle presented the item to the Board and gave a PowerPoint presentation. Cross Development representative Joe Dell also presented a PowerPoint presentation from their company regarding the proposed project. Cross Development Attorney Chad Roberts was present and spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following people spoke: Hal Muscat, Victoria Brandon, Ada Kennedy, Gloria Cox, Mark Borghesani, Palani Velloo, Laura Hershey, Christine Laurenberg, Melissa (No last name given), Fairlight Ahlgren, Monica Rosenthal and Fletcher Thornton. No one else wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.611:00 A.M. - (Carried over from July 12, 2016) Discussion and Consideration of (a) Separating the Public Works and Water Resources Departments; (b) Approve Revisions to the Water Resources Director classification and establish the minimum qualification criteria; and (c) Request an advertising process broader than normal because of the unique nature of the position and value to the County’ economy. Action Item approved
Carried 5-0 — moved by Steele
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 5-0 — moved by Steele
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 5-0 — moved by Steele
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: June 29, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisor · From: Supervisor Steele · Subject: Discussion and Consideration of (a) Separating the Public Works and Water Resources Departments; (b) Approve Revisions to the Water Resources Director classification and establish the minimum qualification criteria; and (c) Request an advertising process broader than normal because of the unique nature of the position and value to the County' economy.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I request the Board take up the following items for discussion and consideration. This item was taken up before but respectfully temporarily withdrawn while department consolidation was being considered and until the budget was in place: (a) Director Position for the Departments of Water Resources and Public Works. The Water Resources Department has traditionally been a separate entity. The role of Director for Water Resources and Public Works was combined by past action of the Board. The time it takes to properly lead each separate-role department is called into question by the recent fire disaster and the recovery process and particularly because of the pressing problems and technical nature of natural lake management. Either department's actions can negatively affect property values, tourist visits and slow economic growth. In addition, the qualifications for working on and leading lake and watershed runoff issues calls for specialized technical background. Cost vs Lost Opportunity. The present situation may be costing the County grant dollars in addition to lost opportunity for incrementally improving the lake ecosystem. Recently the Board approved onetime support funding to provide a scientist at the Deputy Director level for DWR but the selection did not meet the technical background required for lake science evaluation and project development. Additional consideration is that the difference for funding at the DD vs. the full Director level is minimal compared to the additional value received by changing the present circumstances and a new recruiting effort made. The Department of Public Works requires the attention needed to rebuild infrastructure lost by the fires as well as new infrastructures needed to upgrade to modern standards. In addition are the road, bridge and other infrastructure maintenance and upgrade pressures for the rest of the County amid changing standards and economic growth. The Department of Water Resources is not only in charge of flood and water delivery structures as is traditional but natural systems such as wetland, emergent vegetation, stream and lake functions. The lake has a history of nutrient loading and internal loading including phosphorus, nitrogen and micronutrients. The result has been significant cyanobacteria bloom cycles and cyano-toxin byproducts that affect water supply and water contact recreation. The issues are technically complex, have led to TMDL sanctions by regulators (RWQCB) and require a specialized background to both understand and develop cost effective management programs that reassure residents and visiting public. If the lake becomes known for toxic shoreline waters for pets and water contact sports (such as recently in the Russian River) the economy can be even more severely affected. Without a carefully chosen and well supported Director, the Water Resources Department will flounder to understand the lake ecosystem and advise the Board. Clear Lake is the underpinning of the economy in many areas such as fishing, vacationing, second home and resort vacationers as well as birding and other forms of ecotourism. Continuing to develop those attributes will help make up for lost resort capacity due to the recent fires but also support recovery funding. Grant Driven Management: We are in a state level, competitive, grant driven management system. The County has received grants for the Middle Creek projects for land purchase. A basic ingredient for additional water supply and ecosystem grants are well-founded applications for project funding by technically knowledgeable staff with baseline data. I have visited the Director of Fish and Wildlife and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to understand how to develop better grant funding options for Lake County. In these discussions it was clear that our few applications have not met the mark with technical understanding, water quality monitoring baseline data, benchmarks and project development that describes how the lake works and how the projects will lead to measurable solutions for the lake. One consideration is resolving where the problems for the lake arise. Is it past anthropomorphic changes, present land practices or natural systems (such as internal loading) that need better understanding? Off-road vehicle groups, farming segments, septic systems, lost habitats and bad roads are implicated. Solutions such as expensive wetland restoration in one stream system are seen as the end-all but this is not a guarantee and the metric elements for success are needed. No direct measurements have been made for the comparative inputs throughout the lake basin nor has an estimate of the lake's nutrient lock-up/loss rates developed, or the level of nutrient reduction needed from each sub-watershed. Several decades of scientific studies led to an adequate understanding of the lake processes as revealed in the 1994 Clean Lakes report. But since this report and the supporting scientific publications, this background has not been followed up with watershed monitoring and adaptive management programs that can be used to develop grant applications or advise the Board. The citizens of Lake County should have a Department technically capable of both sorting through and developing good data, developing benchmarks, work-plans and understanding of relevant problems and solutions. (b) Minimum Qualifications. Most lake managers are concerned about artificial lake levels because there are significantly more dam impoundments than natural lake systems in California. Clear Lake is unique as the largest, oldest, natural, warm-water ecosystem in California and not many managers with experience are available in the local recruitment pool. The background for natural lake and watershed ecosystems are embedded in the lake sciences such as Limnology and earth sciences such as fluvial geomorphology. To act at the Director level, additional background in management and administration are also needed. (c) Advertising. Because of the small pool of experienced and technically qualified managers for natural lake ecosystems a recruitment process that advertises our unique lake attributes in the North American Lake Managers Society, the California Lake Managers Society, the American Fisheries Society (AFS), the AFS Cal-Neva group and the Limnology Departments of major Universities (to reach lake manager qualified alumni) should be a minimum addition to the usual advertising methods. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: I recommend that this Board direct staff to develop the necessary actions to separate the Public Works and Water Resources Departments approve revisions to the Water Resources Director classification establishing the special minimum qualification criteria and the protocol needed for broad advertising in the desired field. The Board should adopt this allocation and position establishment in Final Budget Hearings. The recruitment and hire of a new Director should be initiated as soon as possible, and accomplished prior to the Department split as described.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisor FROM: Supervisor Steele DATE: June 29, 2016 SUBJECT: Discussion and Consideration of (a) Separating the Public Works and Water Resources Departments; (b) Approve Revisions to the Water Resources Director classification and establish the minimum qualification criteria; and (c) Request an advertising process broader than normal because of the unique nature of the position and value to the County' economy. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I request the Board take up the following items for discussion and consideration. This item was taken up before but respectfully temporarily withdrawn while department consolidation was being considered and until the budget was in place: (a) Director Position for the Departments of Water Resources and Public Works. The Water Resources Department has traditionally been a separate entity. The role of Director for Water Resources and Public Works was combined by past action of the Board. The time it takes to properly lead each separate-role department is called into question by the recent fire disaster and the recovery process and particularly because of the pressing problems and technical nature of natural lake management. Either department's actions can negatively affect property values, tourist visits and slow economic growth. In addition, the qualifications for working on and leading lake and watershed runoff issues calls for specialized technical background. Cost vs Lost Opportunity. The present situation may be costing the County grant dollars in addition to lost opportunity for incrementally improving the lake ecosystem. Recently the Board approved onetime support funding to provide a scientist at the Deputy Director level for DWR but the selection did not meet the technical background required for lake science evaluation and project development. Additional consideration is that the difference for funding at the DD vs. the full Director level is minimal compared to the additional value received by changing the present circumstances and a new recruiting effort made. The Department of Public Works requires the attention needed to rebuild infrastructure lost by the fires as well as new infrastructures needed to upgrade to modern standards. In addition are the road, bridge and other infrastructure maintenance and upgrade pressures for the rest of the County amid changing standards and economic growth. The Department of Water Resources is not only in charge of flood and water delivery structures as is traditional but natural systems such as wetland, emergent vegetation, stream and lake functions. The lake has a history of nutrient loading and internal loading including phosphorus, nitrogen and micronutrients. The result has been significant cyanobacteria bloom cycles and cyano-toxin byproducts that affect water supply and water contact recreation. The issues are technically complex, have led to TMDL sanctions by regulators (RWQCB) and require a specialized background to both understand and develop cost effective management programs that reassure residents and visiting public. If the lake becomes known for toxic shoreline waters for pets and water contact sports (such as recently in the Russian River) the economy can be even more severely affected. Without a carefully chosen and well supported Director, the Water Resources Department will flounder to understand the lake ecosystem and advise the Board. Clear Lake is the underpinning of the economy in many areas such as fishing, vacationing, second home and resort vacationers as well as birding and other forms of ecotourism. Continuing to develop those attributes will help make up for lost resort capacity due to the recent fires but also support recovery funding. Grant Driven Management: We are in a state level, competitive, grant driven management system. The County has received grants for the Middle Creek projects for land purchase. A basic ingredient for additional water supply and ecosystem grants are well-founded applications for project funding by technically knowledgeable staff with baseline data. I have visited the Director of Fish and Wildlife and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to understand how to develop better grant funding options for Lake County. In these discussions it was clear that our few applications have not met the mark with technical understanding, water quality monitoring baseline data, benchmarks and project development that describes how the lake works and how the projects will lead to measurable solutions for the lake. One consideration is resolving where the problems for the lake arise. Is it past anthropomorphic changes, present land practices or natural systems (such as internal loading) that need better understanding? Off-road vehicle groups, farming segments, septic systems, lost habitats and bad roads are implicated. Solutions such as expensive wetland restoration in one stream system are seen as the end-all but this is not a guarantee and the metric elements for success are needed. No direct measurements have been made for the comparative inputs throughout the lake basin nor has an estimate of the lake's nutrient lock-up/loss rates developed, or the level of nutrient reduction needed from each sub-watershed. Several decades of scientific studies led to an adequate understanding of the lake processes as revealed in the 1994 Clean Lakes report. But since this report and the supporting scientific publications, this background has not been followed up with watershed monitoring and adaptive management programs that can be used to develop grant applications or advise the Board. The citizens of Lake County should have a Department technically capable of both sorting through and developing good data, developing benchmarks, work-plans and understanding of relevant problems and solutions. (b) Minimum Qualifications. Most lake managers are concerned about artificial lake levels because there are significantly more dam impoundments than natural lake systems in California. Clear Lake is unique as the largest, oldest, natural, warm-water ecosystem in California and not many managers with experience are available in the local recruitment pool. The background for natural lake and watershed ecosystems are embedded in the lake sciences such as Limnology and earth sciences such as fluvial geomorphology. To act at the Director level, additional background in management and administration are also needed. (c) Advertising. Because of the small pool of experienced and technically qualified managers for natural lake ecosystems a recruitment process that advertises our unique lake attributes in the North American Lake Managers Society, the California Lake Managers Society, the American Fisheries Society (AFS), the AFS Cal-Neva group and the Limnology Departments of major Universities (to reach lake manager qualified alumni) should be a minimum addition to the usual advertising methods. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: I recommend that this Board direct staff to develop the necessary actions to separate the Public Works and Water Resources Departments approve revisions to the Water Resources Director classification establishing the special minimum qualification criteria and the protocol needed for broad advertising in the desired field. The Board should adopt this allocation and position establishment in Final Budget Hearings. The recruitment and hire of a new Director should be initiated as soon as possible, and accomplished prior to the Department split as described.
(a) On motion of Supervisor Steele, and by vote of the Board, approved separating the Public Works and Water Resources Departments . The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock (b) On motion of Supervisor Steele, and by vote of the Board, approved revisions to the Water Resources Director classification and establish the minimum qualification criteria. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock (c) On motion of Supervisor Steele, and by vote of the Board, approved an advertising process broader than normal because of the unique nature of the position and value to the County’ economy. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock
Clerk’s notes: Supervisor Steele presented the item to the Board. Public Works Director Scott DeLeon was present and spoke. Human Resources Director Kathy Ferguson spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following people spoke: Joan Moss, Tom Nixon, Jillian Purlow, Fletcher Thornton and Mireya Turner. No one else wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.711:30 A.M. - Consideration of Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement with Veterans Housing Development Corporation Agreement
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: July 8, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Carol J. Huchingson. County Administrative Officer · Subject: Consideration of Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement with Veterans Housing Development Corporation

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In July of 2015, at the initiation of Supervisor Farrington, your Board approved an agreement with Veterans Housing Development Corporation (VHDC) for the purpose of evaluating the viability of a permanent supportive housing development for very low income veterans and their families on County-owned property in the City of Clearlake located adjacent to Redbud Hospital. To that end, the agreement provides VHDC with the opportunity to conduct pre-development activities to determine: � The projected number of veterans in Lake County that are in need of permanent supportive housing. � The scope of the project, the cost to construct and whether it is likely to be financially self-supporting. � The availability of funding for the project. � The planning requirements such as acquisition of entitlements, permits, zoning, and necessary public infrastructure. Depending on the above findings, VHDC will then determine whether to conduct an environment site assessment and develop preliminary site plans. PROJECT STATUS: The agreement provided a one-year time period to determine if sufficient progress was being made in completing these tasks. Because this is an exclusive agreement precluding the County from entering into negotiations with any others regarding the disposition or development of the site, it is especially important to monitor progress. To that end, staff has met twice with VHDC representatives during the preceding 12 months during which the developer has identified several potential funding sources, including the State Veterans Housing and Homelessness (VHHP) Prevention bond act, tax credits, and the new "No Place Like Home" funding opportunity provided for in the 2016/17 state budget. The developer is also working with the VA and local veterans' organizations to document sufficient demand for the housing to meet VHHP criteria. The City of Clearlake has also secured the funding necessary to complete the extension of Dam Road that will bisect the property. Staff believes that sufficient progress has been made to warrant an 18-month extension of the agreement to allow VHDC to continue its pre-development evaluation. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: In light of the foregoing, staff recommends that the Term of the agreement be extended 18 months pursuant to the attached contract amendment.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Carol J. Huchingson. County Administrative Officer DATE: July 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement with Veterans Housing Development Corporation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In July of 2015, at the initiation of Supervisor Farrington, your Board approved an agreement with Veterans Housing Development Corporation (VHDC) for the purpose of evaluating the viability of a permanent supportive housing development for very low income veterans and their families on County-owned property in the City of Clearlake located adjacent to Redbud Hospital. To that end, the agreement provides VHDC with the opportunity to conduct pre-development activities to determine: � The projected number of veterans in Lake County that are in need of permanent supportive housing. � The scope of the project, the cost to construct and whether it is likely to be financially self-supporting. � The availability of funding for the project. � The planning requirements such as acquisition of entitlements, permits, zoning, and necessary public infrastructure. Depending on the above findings, VHDC will then determine whether to conduct an environment site assessment and develop preliminary site plans. PROJECT STATUS: The agreement provided a one-year time period to determine if sufficient progress was being made in completing these tasks. Because this is an exclusive agreement precluding the County from entering into negotiations with any others regarding the disposition or development of the site, it is especially important to monitor progress. To that end, staff has met twice with VHDC representatives during the preceding 12 months during which the developer has identified several potential funding sources, including the State Veterans Housing and Homelessness (VHHP) Prevention bond act, tax credits, and the new "No Place Like Home" funding opportunity provided for in the 2016/17 state budget. The developer is also working with the VA and local veterans' organizations to document sufficient demand for the housing to meet VHHP criteria. The City of Clearlake has also secured the funding necessary to complete the extension of Dam Road that will bisect the property. Staff believes that sufficient progress has been made to warrant an 18-month extension of the agreement to allow VHDC to continue its pre-development evaluation. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: In light of the foregoing, staff recommends that the Term of the agreement be extended 18 months pursuant to the attached contract amendment.
The Board directed staff to add a requirement that the Veterans Housing Development Corporation apply for grant funds by a deadline. This item will be brought back on the August 2, 2016 meeting.
Clerk’s notes: County Administrative Officer Carol Huchingson presented the item to the Board. Chief Interim County Administrative Officer Jeff Rein was also present and spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.

9. Non-Timed Items

9.1Supervisors’ weekly calendar, travel and reports
9.2Approve Agreement between the County of Lake and Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. for Abatement of Nuisance Conditions at 10715 Gifford Springs Rd, Cobb (owner Benjamin Hittle, APN 013-037-07), for the amount of $15,000 and authorize Chair to sign. Action Item approved — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Comstock (recovered from the archived minutes by OCR)
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 5-0 — moved by Smith (recovered from the archived minutes by OCR)
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: June 23, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Robert Massarelli, Community Development Director Michael Penhall, Code Enforcement Officer · Subject: Approval of Agreement between the County of Lake and Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. for Abatement of Nuisance Conditions at 10715 Gifford Springs Rd, Cobb

Attachment: Agreement to Abate Property at 10715 Gifford Springs Rd, Cobb EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Community Development Department requests your Board's approval of the attached agreement with Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. for abatement of nuisance conditions at 10715 Gifford Springs Rd, Cobb. Staff sought several bids for abatement of this site, but only received two responses. The apparent low bid was from Fossa's Backhoe Service, at $12,200.00. After further review by the contractor, he declined the contract due to a conflict of interest. County Staff contacted the next bidder: Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. whose original bid was $17,320.00. Staff was able to negotiate the price to $15,000.00. The property consists of an unpermitted, substandard structure. A Nuisance Abatement Hearing was conducted on March 22, 2016 with your Board directing the property owner: Benjamin Hittle to provide building drawings, pay fines and obtain permits within 30 days (April 22, 2016). On April 25, 2016 Mr. Hittle came into the office and paid the fines of $3,138.80 that were due and informed Staff that the plans would be submitted by the end of week (April 29, 2016). On May 13, 2016 no plans had been submitted or permit applied for. Staff requested bids from several local contractors for abatement of the property. On June 22, 2016 staff reevaluated the bid and propose award to the next apparent low bidder: Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. ..Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached Agreement between the County of Lake and Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that the Board of Supervisors approve the Agreement for abatement services with Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. for abatement of nuisance conditions located at 10715 Gifford Springs Road, Cobb CA, in the amount of $15,000.00 and authorize the Chair to execute said agreement. :
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Robert Massarelli, Community Development Director Michael Penhall, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement between the County of Lake and Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. for Abatement of Nuisance Conditions at 10715 Gifford Springs Rd, Cobb DATE: June 23, 2016 Attachment: Agreement to Abate Property at 10715 Gifford Springs Rd, Cobb EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Community Development Department requests your Board's approval of the attached agreement with Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. for abatement of nuisance conditions at 10715 Gifford Springs Rd, Cobb. Staff sought several bids for abatement of this site, but only received two responses. The apparent low bid was from Fossa's Backhoe Service, at $12,200.00. After further review by the contractor, he declined the contract due to a conflict of interest. County Staff contacted the next bidder: Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. whose original bid was $17,320.00. Staff was able to negotiate the price to $15,000.00. The property consists of an unpermitted, substandard structure. A Nuisance Abatement Hearing was conducted on March 22, 2016 with your Board directing the property owner: Benjamin Hittle to provide building drawings, pay fines and obtain permits within 30 days (April 22, 2016). On April 25, 2016 Mr. Hittle came into the office and paid the fines of $3,138.80 that were due and informed Staff that the plans would be submitted by the end of week (April 29, 2016). On May 13, 2016 no plans had been submitted or permit applied for. Staff requested bids from several local contractors for abatement of the property. On June 22, 2016 staff reevaluated the bid and propose award to the next apparent low bidder: Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. ..Recommended Action Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve the attached Agreement between the County of Lake and Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that the Board of Supervisors approve the Agreement for abatement services with Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. for abatement of nuisance conditions located at 10715 Gifford Springs Road, Cobb CA, in the amount of $15,000.00 and authorize the Chair to execute said agreement. :
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, approved the Agreement between the County of Lake and Coleman Environmental Engineering Inc. for Abatement of Nuisance Conditions at 10715 Gifford Springs Rd, Cobb (owner Benjamin Hittle, APN 013-037-07), for the amount of $15,000. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Community Development Code Enforcement Officer Mike Penhall presented the item to the Board. Environmental Health Director Ray Ruminski was also present and spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of the item was closed.
9.3Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Ordinance Imposing a Medical Cannabis Cultivation Tax in the Unincorporated Areas of Lake County Ordinance
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: July 6, 2016 · To: THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS · From: ANITA L. GRANT County Counsel · Subject: Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Ordinance Imposing a Medical Cannabis Cultivation Tax in the Unincorporated Areas of Lake County

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Business and Professions Code section 19348 authorizes a county to impose a tax "on the privilege of cultivating' medical cannabis. Any ordinance proposing such a tax is subject to all applicable voter approval requirements imposed by law. Supervisor Farrington's ad hoc committee has been working on an ordinance to address cultivation permitting. The committee has also reviewed and considered the possibility of imposing a tax on cultivation as a means of raising County revenue to address the impact on County resources and in order to expand and enhance County education programs for youth. A rough draft of an ordinance is attached here for your Board's review and comment. Subject to your Board's approval, when the ordinance is in final draft, a resolution may be adopted placing that ordinance before the voters on the November 2016 ballot. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: That your Board consider this draft ordinance and provide direction to staff, by motion or consensus, regarding any changes, corrections, or additions to the draft so that it may be brought back to your Board for approval.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: ANITA L. GRANT County Counsel DATE: July 6, 2016 SUBJECT: Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Ordinance Imposing a Medical Cannabis Cultivation Tax in the Unincorporated Areas of Lake County EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Business and Professions Code section 19348 authorizes a county to impose a tax "on the privilege of cultivating' medical cannabis. Any ordinance proposing such a tax is subject to all applicable voter approval requirements imposed by law. Supervisor Farrington's ad hoc committee has been working on an ordinance to address cultivation permitting. The committee has also reviewed and considered the possibility of imposing a tax on cultivation as a means of raising County revenue to address the impact on County resources and in order to expand and enhance County education programs for youth. A rough draft of an ordinance is attached here for your Board's review and comment. Subject to your Board's approval, when the ordinance is in final draft, a resolution may be adopted placing that ordinance before the voters on the November 2016 ballot. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: That your Board consider this draft ordinance and provide direction to staff, by motion or consensus, regarding any changes, corrections, or additions to the draft so that it may be brought back to your Board for approval.
By consensus, the Board agreed to changes in the Ordinance so that it may be brought back for the First Reading on July 26, 2016.
Clerk’s notes: County Counsel Anita Grant presented the item to the Board. Community Development Director Bob Massarelli was present and spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following person spoke: Sheryl Carr. No one else wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.4(Continued from July 12, 2016 and June 14, 2016) Consideration of an Agreement Between the County of Lake and Martin Scheel for the Repayment of Abatement Costs Associated with the Removal of a Submerged Crane in Clear Lake. Agreement approved — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: July 13, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Carol J. Huchingson, County Administrative Officer · Subject: Consideration of an Agreement between the County of Lake and Martin Scheel for the Repayment of Abatement Costs Associated with the Removal of a Submerged Crane in Clear Lake

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In 2011, the County of Lake contracted with Meridian Construction to remove from Clear Lake a submerged crane owned by Martin Scheel, after it slipped from a barge during a storm. The total cost of the abatement was $59,945.07; however the retrieved crane was sold to a salvage company and those proceeds ($4,039.00) were applied to the account, for a final abatement cost of $55,906.07. The purpose of today's item is to consider a Repayment Agreement between the County and Martin Scheel. On June 14, 2016, your Board discussed this matter and at the conclusion of your discussion, you requested that Martin Scheel attempt to secure other financing to repay the County for this abatement. Your Board continued this discussion to enable Martin Scheel to seek other funding and provide a status update on July 12, 2016. On July 12, 2016, Martin Scheel provided a statement to your Board advising he was not able to secure other funding to repay the abatement cost. After discussion, your Board asked staff to develop an amortized loan repayment plan, including interest, and return for consideration on July 19, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Agreement Between the County of Lake and Martin Scheel for the Repayment of Abatement Costs Associated with the Removal of a Submerged Crane in Clear Lake, or in the event Martin Scheel has secured other funding, take necessary actions to accept payment.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Carol J. Huchingson, County Administrative Officer DATE: July 13, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration of an Agreement between the County of Lake and Martin Scheel for the Repayment of Abatement Costs Associated with the Removal of a Submerged Crane in Clear Lake EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In 2011, the County of Lake contracted with Meridian Construction to remove from Clear Lake a submerged crane owned by Martin Scheel, after it slipped from a barge during a storm. The total cost of the abatement was $59,945.07; however the retrieved crane was sold to a salvage company and those proceeds ($4,039.00) were applied to the account, for a final abatement cost of $55,906.07. The purpose of today's item is to consider a Repayment Agreement between the County and Martin Scheel. On June 14, 2016, your Board discussed this matter and at the conclusion of your discussion, you requested that Martin Scheel attempt to secure other financing to repay the County for this abatement. Your Board continued this discussion to enable Martin Scheel to seek other funding and provide a status update on July 12, 2016. On July 12, 2016, Martin Scheel provided a statement to your Board advising he was not able to secure other funding to repay the abatement cost. After discussion, your Board asked staff to develop an amortized loan repayment plan, including interest, and return for consideration on July 19, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Agreement Between the County of Lake and Martin Scheel for the Repayment of Abatement Costs Associated with the Removal of a Submerged Crane in Clear Lake, or in the event Martin Scheel has secured other funding, take necessary actions to accept payment.
On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved the Agreement between the County of Lake and Martin Scheel for the Repayment of Abatement Costs Associated with the Removal of a Submerged Crane in Clear Lake. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: County Administrative Officer Carol Huchingson presented the item to the Board. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.

10. Closed Session

10.1Conference with Labor Negotiator: (a) County Negotiators: A. Grant, S. Harry, C. Huchingson, K. Ferguson and S. Jansen; and (b) Employee Organizations: DDAA, DSA, LCCOA, LCEA and LCSEA
10.2Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing Litigation pursuant to Gov. Code sec. 54956.9(d)(1) – Prisbrey v. County of Lake, et al. Closed Session Item
10.3Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing Litigation pursuant to Gov. Code sec. 54956.9(d)(1) – Lakeside Height HOA, et al. v. County of Lake Closed Session Item
10.4Conference with Legal Counsel: Decision Whether to Initiate Litigation pursuant to Gov. Code sec. 54956.9(d)(4) – two potential cases Closed Session Item
Clerk’s notes: The Board reconvened into Regular Session at 6:20 p.m. having taken the following action: On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, authorized unlawful detainer action vs David Flores.

11. Adjournment