Lake County Meetings — interactive archive

Board Of Supervisors — Tuesday, June 7, 2016

9:00 AM · Board Chambers

1. Call to Order

2. Moment of Silence

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Presentation of Animals at the Animal Care and Control Shelter

5. Consideration of Items Not Appearing on the Posted Agenda (Extra Items)

6. Current Construction Projects - Contract Change Orders

7. Approval of the Consent Agenda

7.1Adopt Proclamation Commending Joey Brodnik for Volunteer Efforts to the Lake County Residents Affected by the Valley Fire. Proclamation passed on consent
7.2Adopt Proclamation Commending Lori and Gene Thornton for Volunteer Efforts to the Lake County Residents Affected by the Valley Fire. Proclamation passed on consent
7.3Adopt Proclamation Commending Sharon Thornton for Volunteer Efforts to the Lake County Residents Affected by the Valley Fire. Proclamation passed on consent
7.4(a) Waive the competitive bidding process; and (b) Approve agreement between the County of Lake and Richard Bachman, DVM for FY 2016/17 Veterinary Services in the amount of $140,000 and authorize the Chair to sign. Agreement passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: June 7, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: William Davidson, Lake County Animal Care & Control Director · Subject: (a) Waive the competitive bidding process; and (b) Approve agreement between the County of Lake and Richard Bachman, DVM for FY 2016/17 Veterinary Services in the amount of $140,000 and authorize the Chair to sign.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Our veterinary services contract will continue to be provided by Richard Bachman DVM. Our last search for a veterinarian during spring of 2015 produced no results. It was only after some considerable discussion that Dr. Bachman agreed to accept the contract for 15/16. Therefore, staff requests that per County Code Section 2-38.2 your Board determine that competitive bidding would produce no economic benefit to the County. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: $140,000 Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board: (a) Waive the competitive bidding process; and (b) Approve agreement between the County of Lake and Richard Bachman, DVM for FY 2016/17 Veterinary Services in the amount of $140,000 and authorize the Chair to sign.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: William Davidson, Lake County Animal Care & Control Director DATE: June 7, 2016 SUBJECT: (a) Waive the competitive bidding process; and (b) Approve agreement between the County of Lake and Richard Bachman, DVM for FY 2016/17 Veterinary Services in the amount of $140,000 and authorize the Chair to sign. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Our veterinary services contract will continue to be provided by Richard Bachman DVM. Our last search for a veterinarian during spring of 2015 produced no results. It was only after some considerable discussion that Dr. Bachman agreed to accept the contract for 15/16. Therefore, staff requests that per County Code Section 2-38.2 your Board determine that competitive bidding would produce no economic benefit to the County. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: $140,000 Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board: (a) Waive the competitive bidding process; and (b) Approve agreement between the County of Lake and Richard Bachman, DVM for FY 2016/17 Veterinary Services in the amount of $140,000 and authorize the Chair to sign.
7.5Approve long distance travel for Animal Control Officer Alicia Brisker to Durango, Colorado August 29, 2016- September 3, 2016 to attend the Equine Investigators Academy on a partial scholarship. Action Item passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: June 7, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: William Davidson, Animal Care and Control Director · Subject: Approve long distance travel for Animal Control Officer Alicia Brisker to Durango, Colorado August 29, 2016- September 3, 2016 to attend the Equine Investigators Academy on a partial scholarship.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Once again I would like to ask for your approval to send Animal Control Officer Alicia Brisker to the Equine Investigators Academy in Durango Colorado between August 29th, 2016 and September 3rd, 2016. This training is provided via a partial scholarship, which covers 50% of the required tuition. The tuition covers room, board, and educational materials, a value of $1,750 per person. Our cost is $875 and the flight to and from Durango, Colorado (approximately $500 each roundtrip). This request comes early this year. Due to staff shortage and medical leave we have extra funding available in 29.50 (travel/training), which will help to alleviate this request in next year's budget 16/17. Code 3 Associates, a non-profit 501 C 3, and is associated with the University of Colorado for accreditation and concentrates their educational efforts on training and disaster response. This organization has provided us with multiple scholarships over the years, and continues to assist us with every request we make. The training being provided is essential to our Animal Control Officers. Our county is very rural and we experience a high percentage of calls for livestock, particularly horses. This intensive 50 hour course concentrates specifically on equines and their nutritional needs, Body Condition Scoring, first aid and veterinary care, foot and leg care, and many more subjects that are vital to successfully handling horses. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve long distance travel for Animal Control Officer Alicia Brisker to Durango, Colorado August 29, 2016- September 3, 2016 to attend the Equine Investigators Academy on a partial scholarship.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: William Davidson, Animal Care and Control Director DATE: June 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve long distance travel for Animal Control Officer Alicia Brisker to Durango, Colorado August 29, 2016- September 3, 2016 to attend the Equine Investigators Academy on a partial scholarship. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Once again I would like to ask for your approval to send Animal Control Officer Alicia Brisker to the Equine Investigators Academy in Durango Colorado between August 29th, 2016 and September 3rd, 2016. This training is provided via a partial scholarship, which covers 50% of the required tuition. The tuition covers room, board, and educational materials, a value of $1,750 per person. Our cost is $875 and the flight to and from Durango, Colorado (approximately $500 each roundtrip). This request comes early this year. Due to staff shortage and medical leave we have extra funding available in 29.50 (travel/training), which will help to alleviate this request in next year's budget 16/17. Code 3 Associates, a non-profit 501 C 3, and is associated with the University of Colorado for accreditation and concentrates their educational efforts on training and disaster response. This organization has provided us with multiple scholarships over the years, and continues to assist us with every request we make. The training being provided is essential to our Animal Control Officers. Our county is very rural and we experience a high percentage of calls for livestock, particularly horses. This intensive 50 hour course concentrates specifically on equines and their nutritional needs, Body Condition Scoring, first aid and veterinary care, foot and leg care, and many more subjects that are vital to successfully handling horses. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve long distance travel for Animal Control Officer Alicia Brisker to Durango, Colorado August 29, 2016- September 3, 2016 to attend the Equine Investigators Academy on a partial scholarship.
7.6Approve Agreement between Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital and County of Lake for Acute Professional Psychiatric Inpatient Services for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $126,200 and authorize Chair to sign. Action Item passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 · To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS · From: Kevin L. Thompson, LMFT, MAC Interim Behavioral Health Director · Subject: Agreement between Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital and County of Lake for Acute Professional Psychiatric Inpatient Services for Fiscal Year 2015-16. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached, for your approval, is the Agreement between Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital and County of Lake for Acute Professional Psychiatric Inpatient Services for Fiscal Year 2015-16.

Lake County Behavioral Health is mandated to pay inpatient psychiatric hospital services for Lake County clients. Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital is an acute psychiatric hospital providing and acute hospital level of care. The facility has been useful for the hospitalization of Lake County clients when required. Recent utilization requires that Lake County Behavioral Health execute a contract with this facility. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Current Contract Amount: (Amendment): $126,200 Funds Available for Amendment: $25,312 Additional Requested: N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/A FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Lake County Behavioral Health (LCBH) has placed multiple clients at Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital; therefore, in order to reimburse Aurora, LCBH is requesting approval of the Agreement for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $126,200. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Lake County Behavioral Health requests the Board approve the Agreement between Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital and County of Lake for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $126,200 and is requesting the Board Chair to sign the Agreement.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Kevin L. Thompson, LMFT, MAC Interim Behavioral Health Director DATE: May 24, 2016 SUBJECT: Agreement between Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital and County of Lake for Acute Professional Psychiatric Inpatient Services for Fiscal Year 2015-16. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached, for your approval, is the Agreement between Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital and County of Lake for Acute Professional Psychiatric Inpatient Services for Fiscal Year 2015-16. Lake County Behavioral Health is mandated to pay inpatient psychiatric hospital services for Lake County clients. Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital is an acute psychiatric hospital providing and acute hospital level of care. The facility has been useful for the hospitalization of Lake County clients when required. Recent utilization requires that Lake County Behavioral Health execute a contract with this facility. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Current Contract Amount: (Amendment): $126,200 Funds Available for Amendment: $25,312 Additional Requested: N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/A FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Lake County Behavioral Health (LCBH) has placed multiple clients at Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital; therefore, in order to reimburse Aurora, LCBH is requesting approval of the Agreement for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $126,200. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Lake County Behavioral Health requests the Board approve the Agreement between Aurora Santa Rosa Hospital and County of Lake for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $126,200 and is requesting the Board Chair to sign the Agreement.
7.7Approve First Amendment to the Agreement between Davis Guest Home and the County of Lake for Adult Residential Support for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $34,770 and authorize Chair to sign. Action Item passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: June 7, 2016 · To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS · From: KEVIN L. THOMPSON Interim Behavioral Health Director · Subject: First Amendment to the Agreement between Davis Guest Home and the County of Lake for Adult Residential Support for Fiscal Year 2015-16. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached, for your approval, is the First Amendment to the Agreement between Davis Guest Home and the County of Lake for Adult Residential Support for Fiscal Year 2015-16.

FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Current Contract Amount (With Amendment): $34,770 Funds Available for Amendment: Additional Requested: N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/A FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Due to the placement of an additional Lake County beneficiary at this Adult Residential facility, Lake County Behavioral Health is requesting approval of the First Amendment to the Agreement for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $34,770. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Lake County Behavioral Health requests board approve the First Amendment to the Agreement between Davis Guest Home and County of Lake for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $34,770 and is requesting the Board Chair to sign the Amendment.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: KEVIN L. THOMPSON Interim Behavioral Health Director DATE: June 7, 2016 SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Agreement between Davis Guest Home and the County of Lake for Adult Residential Support for Fiscal Year 2015-16. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached, for your approval, is the First Amendment to the Agreement between Davis Guest Home and the County of Lake for Adult Residential Support for Fiscal Year 2015-16. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Current Contract Amount (With Amendment): $34,770 Funds Available for Amendment: Additional Requested: N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/A FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Due to the placement of an additional Lake County beneficiary at this Adult Residential facility, Lake County Behavioral Health is requesting approval of the First Amendment to the Agreement for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $34,770. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Lake County Behavioral Health requests board approve the First Amendment to the Agreement between Davis Guest Home and County of Lake for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a new contract maximum of $34,770 and is requesting the Board Chair to sign the Amendment.
7.8Approve Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Access to Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) County Claim Reports for Fiscal Year 2015-16 for a contract maximum of $16,500 and authorize the Chair to sign. Action Item passed on consent
Staff memo

To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS · From: Kevin L. Thompson, MPA, CATC Interim Behavioral Health Director · Subject: Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Access to Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) County Claim Reports for Fiscal Year 2016-17.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached for your approval is the Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Fiscal Year 2016-17. Under the Agreement, Lake County Behavioral Health (LCBH) is obligated to pay for access to DHCS County Claim Reports which consist of claim uploads (837's) and payment/denials (835's). FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Current Contract Amount: $16,500 Amount Budgeted: $347,000 Additional Requested: N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/A FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): The amount budgeted for various contracts is $347,000; therefore, Lake County Behavioral Health is requesting approval of the Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Fiscal Year 2016-17 for a contract maximum of $16,500. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Lake County Behavioral Health requests approval of the Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Fiscal Year 2016-17 for a contract maximum of $16,500 and to authorize the Board Chair to sign the Agreement.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Kevin L. Thompson, MPA, CATC Interim Behavioral Health Director DATE: SUBJECT: Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Access to Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) County Claim Reports for Fiscal Year 2016-17. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Attached for your approval is the Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Fiscal Year 2016-17. Under the Agreement, Lake County Behavioral Health (LCBH) is obligated to pay for access to DHCS County Claim Reports which consist of claim uploads (837's) and payment/denials (835's). FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Current Contract Amount: $16,500 Amount Budgeted: $347,000 Additional Requested: N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/A FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): The amount budgeted for various contracts is $347,000; therefore, Lake County Behavioral Health is requesting approval of the Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Fiscal Year 2016-17 for a contract maximum of $16,500. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Lake County Behavioral Health requests approval of the Agreement between the County of Lake and Dimension Reports, LLC for Fiscal Year 2016-17 for a contract maximum of $16,500 and to authorize the Board Chair to sign the Agreement.
7.9Approve Resolution Approving an Agreement Between Lake County Health Services Department and the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) for Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Capacity Building Funds in the Amount of $15,000 and Authorizing the Director of Health Services to Sign Said Agreement. Resolution passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: June 7, 2016 · To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS · From: Jim Brown, Health Services Director · Subject: Approve Resolution Approving an Agreement Between Lake County Health Services Department and the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) for Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Capacity Building Funds in the Amount of $15,000 and Authorizing the Director of Health Services to Sign Said Agreement.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Health Services Emergency Preparedness Program was recently awarded a grant through NACCHO in the amount of $15,000 to support capacity building for the Lake County Medical Reserve Corps (MRC). The Lake County MRC attained accreditation in April of 2007 from the Office of the Surgeon General and currently has approximately 17 volunteers consisting of Registered Nurses, Dentists, Veterinarians and non-medical volunteers. The goal for Health Services is to continue to develop and train the MRC volunteers so that they are prepared to respond in the context of our local emergency response plans. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact either myself or Karen Tait, Health Officer, at 263-1090 FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted _X_Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): None STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Resolution Approving an Agreement Between Lake County Health Services Department and the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) for Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Capacity Building Funds in the Amount of $15,000 and Authorizing the Director of Health Services to Sign Said Agreement.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Jim Brown, Health Services Director DATE: June 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Approving an Agreement Between Lake County Health Services Department and the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) for Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Capacity Building Funds in the Amount of $15,000 and Authorizing the Director of Health Services to Sign Said Agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Health Services Emergency Preparedness Program was recently awarded a grant through NACCHO in the amount of $15,000 to support capacity building for the Lake County Medical Reserve Corps (MRC). The Lake County MRC attained accreditation in April of 2007 from the Office of the Surgeon General and currently has approximately 17 volunteers consisting of Registered Nurses, Dentists, Veterinarians and non-medical volunteers. The goal for Health Services is to continue to develop and train the MRC volunteers so that they are prepared to respond in the context of our local emergency response plans. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact either myself or Karen Tait, Health Officer, at 263-1090 FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted _X_Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): None STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Resolution Approving an Agreement Between Lake County Health Services Department and the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) for Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Capacity Building Funds in the Amount of $15,000 and Authorizing the Director of Health Services to Sign Said Agreement.
7.10Approve Amendment One to the Agreement between the County of Lake and SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc., for Technical Services in Support of the Implementation of Cleanup and Abatement Order R5-2015-0713 at the Eastlake Landfill in the amount of $13,460 for a new contract maximum of $36,260 and authorize Chair to sign. Agreement passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: May 23, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Lars Ewing, Public Services Director · Subject: Approve Amendment One to the Agreement between the County of Lake and SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc., for Technical Services in Support of the Implementation of Cleanup and Abatement Order R5-2015-0713 at the Eastlake Landfill in the amount of $13,460 for a new contract maximum of $36,260 and authorize Chair to sign.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On November 1, 2015, the County entered into an agreement with SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc. in the amount of $22,800 to perform technical services in support of the implementation of California Regional Water Quality Control Board Cleanup and Abatement Order R5-2015-0713 (CAO). Amendment One is now required to amend the scope of the Agreement and add $13,460 to the Agreement price for a total cost of $36,260. The CAO was issued for the County to implement appropriate actions to address groundwater concerns at the Eastlake Landfill. The original Agreement scope of work and associated price was established based upon the level of effort presumed to be necessary at that time for the portion of the CAO to investigate and delineate volatile organic compounds in the groundwater. However, the work requested by the Water Board since the execution of the Agreement has exceeded the initial estimates. Therefore it is necessary to amend the scope of work and price for the work package, field program, reporting, and agency submittals tasks. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted x_Non-Budgeted Amount Budgeted: $22,800.00 Additional Requested: $13,460.00 Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Amendment One to the Agreement between the County of Lake and SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc., for Technical Services in Support of the Implementation of Cleanup and Abatement Order R5-2015-0713 at the Eastlake Landfill in the amount of $13,460 for a new contract maximum of $36,260 and authorize Chair to sign.

No additional funding requested — the memo's cost fields were left blank, which on this form means the item is already budgeted.

Original memo text
MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Lars Ewing, Public Services Director DATE: May 23, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve Amendment One to the Agreement between the County of Lake and SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc., for Technical Services in Support of the Implementation of Cleanup and Abatement Order R5-2015-0713 at the Eastlake Landfill in the amount of $13,460 for a new contract maximum of $36,260 and authorize Chair to sign. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On November 1, 2015, the County entered into an agreement with SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc. in the amount of $22,800 to perform technical services in support of the implementation of California Regional Water Quality Control Board Cleanup and Abatement Order R5-2015-0713 (CAO). Amendment One is now required to amend the scope of the Agreement and add $13,460 to the Agreement price for a total cost of $36,260. The CAO was issued for the County to implement appropriate actions to address groundwater concerns at the Eastlake Landfill. The original Agreement scope of work and associated price was established based upon the level of effort presumed to be necessary at that time for the portion of the CAO to investigate and delineate volatile organic compounds in the groundwater. However, the work requested by the Water Board since the execution of the Agreement has exceeded the initial estimates. Therefore it is necessary to amend the scope of work and price for the work package, field program, reporting, and agency submittals tasks. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted x_Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $13,460.00 Amount Budgeted: $22,800.00 Additional Requested: $13,460.00 Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve Amendment One to the Agreement between the County of Lake and SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc., for Technical Services in Support of the Implementation of Cleanup and Abatement Order R5-2015-0713 at the Eastlake Landfill in the amount of $13,460 for a new contract maximum of $36,260 and authorize Chair to sign.
7.11Adopt Resolution Approving Right-of-Way Certification for the Emergency Roadside Repair Project on Soda Bay Road PM 9.2 - Federal Aid Number # EO-ER-28C1 (002) Resolution passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: May 25, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director · Subject: Adopt Resolution Approving Right-of-Way Certification for the Emergency Roadside Repair Project on Soda Bay Road PM 9.2 - Federal Aid Number # EO-ER-28C1 (002)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Storm events of November and December 2014 created a slide at and below the edge of Soda Bay Road at Post Mile 9.2 causing a 475 foot slip and cracking of the roadway. The County contracted with Geo Stabilization International for an emergency repair of the roadway. As federal funds will be used for the reimbursement of County expenditures for the subject project, Caltrans requires certification that all Right-of-Way is cleared. Staff has verified that all Right-of-Way for this project is clear and ready to proceed with the certification. Caltrans also requires that this Right-of-Way certification be authorized by an approved resolution by the Board of Supervisors. Both documents have been prepared and are attached for your consideration. Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution and Right-of-Way certification. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution and Right-of-Way certification and authorization for the Chair to sign.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director DATE: May 25, 2016 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Approving Right-of-Way Certification for the Emergency Roadside Repair Project on Soda Bay Road PM 9.2 - Federal Aid Number # EO-ER-28C1 (002) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Storm events of November and December 2014 created a slide at and below the edge of Soda Bay Road at Post Mile 9.2 causing a 475 foot slip and cracking of the roadway. The County contracted with Geo Stabilization International for an emergency repair of the roadway. As federal funds will be used for the reimbursement of County expenditures for the subject project, Caltrans requires certification that all Right-of-Way is cleared. Staff has verified that all Right-of-Way for this project is clear and ready to proceed with the certification. Caltrans also requires that this Right-of-Way certification be authorized by an approved resolution by the Board of Supervisors. Both documents have been prepared and are attached for your consideration. Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution and Right-of-Way certification. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution and Right-of-Way certification and authorization for the Chair to sign.
7.12Adopt Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-119 to Amend the Adopted Budget for FY 2015-16 by Canceling Obligated Fund Balance for Road Improvements in the CSA #23 Zone F Piner Court Maintenance Fund Resolution passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: June 7, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott DeLeon, Public Works Director · Subject: Adopt Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-119 to Amend the Adopted Budget for FY 2015-16 by Canceling Obligated Fund Balance for Road Improvements in the CSA #23 Zone F Piner Court Maintenance Fund

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In April, 2006 the Board of Supervisors approved the formation of Zone of Benefit for Piner Court, for the purpose of road maintenance. Contributions to the fund began in 2007, and the road was scheduled for a chip seal surfacing next summer. Because the project on Piner Court is limited in size, and the Department of Public Works intends to perform other chip-seal work in the vicinity, staff wishes to advance the Piner Court work one year to take advantage of reduced material costs due to economies of scale with the other projects. Since the chip seal work will be performed this fiscal year, reserves in Budget Unit 8486 must be cancelled and an appropriation must be added to that same budget for road improvements. In order to utilize these funds for material purchases, the adopted budget needs to be amended to cancel the reserve funds. The attached resolution amends the adopted budget for FY 2015-16 and cancels the obligated fund balance for road improvements in the CSA#23 Piner Court maintenance fund. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-119 to Amend the Adopted Budget for FY 2015-16 by Canceling Obligated Fund Balance for Road Improvements in the CSA #23 Zone F Piner Court Maintenance Fund

No additional funding requested — the memo's cost fields were left blank, which on this form means the item is already budgeted.

Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott DeLeon, Public Works Director DATE: June 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-119 to Amend the Adopted Budget for FY 2015-16 by Canceling Obligated Fund Balance for Road Improvements in the CSA #23 Zone F Piner Court Maintenance Fund EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In April, 2006 the Board of Supervisors approved the formation of Zone of Benefit for Piner Court, for the purpose of road maintenance. Contributions to the fund began in 2007, and the road was scheduled for a chip seal surfacing next summer. Because the project on Piner Court is limited in size, and the Department of Public Works intends to perform other chip-seal work in the vicinity, staff wishes to advance the Piner Court work one year to take advantage of reduced material costs due to economies of scale with the other projects. Since the chip seal work will be performed this fiscal year, reserves in Budget Unit 8486 must be cancelled and an appropriation must be added to that same budget for road improvements. In order to utilize these funds for material purchases, the adopted budget needs to be amended to cancel the reserve funds. The attached resolution amends the adopted budget for FY 2015-16 and cancels the obligated fund balance for road improvements in the CSA#23 Piner Court maintenance fund. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2015-119 to Amend the Adopted Budget for FY 2015-16 by Canceling Obligated Fund Balance for Road Improvements in the CSA #23 Zone F Piner Court Maintenance Fund
7.13Approve Request to Pay Late Travel Claim of $81.00 for Social Worker Supervisor Carrie Bridges while attending mandatory training at UC Davis from 2/23/16 to 2/25/16. Action Item passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: June 7, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Kathy Maes, Interim Social Services Director · Subject: Approve Request to Pay Late Travel Claim of $81.00 for Social Worker Supervisor Carrie Bridges while attending mandatory training at UC Davis from 2/23/16 to 2/25/16.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I am requesting Board approval to pay the attached travel claim of Carrie Bridges, Social Worker Supervisor for Child Welfare Services. On March 18, 2016 Ms. Bridges submitted her claim for travel expenses she incurred while attending mandatory training at UC Davis from 2/23/16 to 2/25/16. Unfortunately, due to misplacement of the request, it was not submitted for my approval until April 21, 2016. By the time the claim was received by the Auditor's office it fell one day outside the 60 day timeframe for submission and payment. I regret the inconvenience this may cause your Board and the Auditor's office, but, because the late submission is not the fault of Ms. Bridges, I request approval from your Board to pay it. As you are aware, there is no additional cost to the County for paying this claim. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): None STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Request to Pay Late Travel Claim of $81.00 for Social Worker Supervisor Carrie Bridges while attending mandatory training at UC Davis from 2/23/16 to 2/25/16. Thank you for your consideration.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Kathy Maes, Interim Social Services Director DATE: June 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Approve Request to Pay Late Travel Claim of $81.00 for Social Worker Supervisor Carrie Bridges while attending mandatory training at UC Davis from 2/23/16 to 2/25/16. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I am requesting Board approval to pay the attached travel claim of Carrie Bridges, Social Worker Supervisor for Child Welfare Services. On March 18, 2016 Ms. Bridges submitted her claim for travel expenses she incurred while attending mandatory training at UC Davis from 2/23/16 to 2/25/16. Unfortunately, due to misplacement of the request, it was not submitted for my approval until April 21, 2016. By the time the claim was received by the Auditor's office it fell one day outside the 60 day timeframe for submission and payment. I regret the inconvenience this may cause your Board and the Auditor's office, but, because the late submission is not the fault of Ms. Bridges, I request approval from your Board to pay it. As you are aware, there is no additional cost to the County for paying this claim. FISCAL IMPACT: _X_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): None STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Request to Pay Late Travel Claim of $81.00 for Social Worker Supervisor Carrie Bridges while attending mandatory training at UC Davis from 2/23/16 to 2/25/16. Thank you for your consideration.
7.14Adopt Resolution Authorizing Special Districts Administrator or his Designee to Sign and Submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funding Application for County Service Area #20, Soda Bay Water System. Resolution passed on consent
Staff memo

Date: May 18, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Mark Dellinger, Administrator Jan Coppinger, Compliance Coordinator · Subject: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Special Districts Administrator or his Designee to Sign and Submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funding Application for County Service Area #20, Soda Bay Water System.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On Feb. 10, 2016 we received confirmation that a Notice of Interest we submitted to the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) to replace redwood storage tanks in the Soda Bay Water System (CSA #20) with steel tanks was deemed eligible and we were invited to apply for funds. CSA #20 has been in need of new storage tanks for some time but the replacement has been put off due to cost. If approved for funding, four redwood tanks would be replaced with new steel tanks. The qualification under the HMGP application is that the redwood tanks would not survive a wildfire and if they were destroyed, the Soda Bay community would be without drinking water and fire suppression capabilities. All of the tanks are located in remote areas that put them at risk of wildfire. This project complies with the County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, pages 73 & 74: Objective 1.2 "The County should attempt to decrease the potential risk associated from Wildland Urban Interface fires through a variety of actions." Action 1.2.1 "assure that adequate access roads, onsite fire protection systems, signage, flame retardant building materials, defensible space, and firebreaks are provided as required by state regulations and county ordinances". Implementation 1.2.1 "The CWPP addresses a variety of components from road construction, water supply and building materials". The funding application calls for a 25% cash match. We are estimating the total cost to be $800,000. The grant will provide $600,000 and CSA #20 will provide $200,000. The CSA currently has sufficient funds to meet the cash match; however we plan to utilize as much in-kind contributions as possible to minimize the cash requirements. We are completing a funding application with Department of Water Resources for a capital project to upgrade the water system and are reserving as much reserves as possible to complete the upgrades. If the HMGP application is successful, we will be able to accomplish a critically needed project and save $600,000 of CSA money to be used in the capital upgrades. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted _X_Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $800,000 Amount Budgeted:N/A Additional Requested:N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): The project would require a funding match of $200,000, most of which would come from Capital Improvement Reserves. CSA #20 is in need of new tanks and to obtain $600,000 in grant funds would result in considerable cost savings to the CSA. Some of the old tanks to be replaced have significant leaks. Replacing them with new tanks will conserve water, and reduce operating costs. If any of the tanks were destroyed in a wildfire, the impact to the system would be catastrophic STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Special Districts Administrator or his Designee to Sign and Submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funding Application for County Service Area #20, Soda Bay Water System.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Mark Dellinger, Administrator Jan Coppinger, Compliance Coordinator DATE: May 18, 2016 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Special Districts Administrator or his Designee to Sign and Submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funding Application for County Service Area #20, Soda Bay Water System. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On Feb. 10, 2016 we received confirmation that a Notice of Interest we submitted to the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) to replace redwood storage tanks in the Soda Bay Water System (CSA #20) with steel tanks was deemed eligible and we were invited to apply for funds. CSA #20 has been in need of new storage tanks for some time but the replacement has been put off due to cost. If approved for funding, four redwood tanks would be replaced with new steel tanks. The qualification under the HMGP application is that the redwood tanks would not survive a wildfire and if they were destroyed, the Soda Bay community would be without drinking water and fire suppression capabilities. All of the tanks are located in remote areas that put them at risk of wildfire. This project complies with the County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, pages 73 & 74: Objective 1.2 "The County should attempt to decrease the potential risk associated from Wildland Urban Interface fires through a variety of actions." Action 1.2.1 "assure that adequate access roads, onsite fire protection systems, signage, flame retardant building materials, defensible space, and firebreaks are provided as required by state regulations and county ordinances". Implementation 1.2.1 "The CWPP addresses a variety of components from road construction, water supply and building materials". The funding application calls for a 25% cash match. We are estimating the total cost to be $800,000. The grant will provide $600,000 and CSA #20 will provide $200,000. The CSA currently has sufficient funds to meet the cash match; however we plan to utilize as much in-kind contributions as possible to minimize the cash requirements. We are completing a funding application with Department of Water Resources for a capital project to upgrade the water system and are reserving as much reserves as possible to complete the upgrades. If the HMGP application is successful, we will be able to accomplish a critically needed project and save $600,000 of CSA money to be used in the capital upgrades. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted _X_Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $800,000 Amount Budgeted:N/A Additional Requested:N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): The project would require a funding match of $200,000, most of which would come from Capital Improvement Reserves. CSA #20 is in need of new tanks and to obtain $600,000 in grant funds would result in considerable cost savings to the CSA. Some of the old tanks to be replaced have significant leaks. Replacing them with new tanks will conserve water, and reduce operating costs. If any of the tanks were destroyed in a wildfire, the impact to the system would be catastrophic STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): None ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Special Districts Administrator or his Designee to Sign and Submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funding Application for County Service Area #20, Soda Bay Water System.
7.15(Sitting as the Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Approve Project Agreement between the State of California Department of Water Resources and the Lake County Watershed Protection District for LCWPD - Levee Patrol Road Gravel Repair in the amount of $45,639 and authorize the Chair to sign. Agreement passed on consent approved — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 · To: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District · From: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director · Subject: Approval of the Project Agreement Between the State of California Department of Water Resources and the Lake County Watershed Protection District for LCWPD - Levee Patrol Road Gravel Repair

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) has developed the Flood System Repair Project (FSRP) to help Local Maintaining Agencies (LMAs) reduce flood risks in non-urban areas. Through FSRP, DWR will assist LMAs by providing them with technical and financial support to repair documented critical problems with flood control facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control (SPFC) in non-urban areas. The objectives of the FSRP are to: * Repair documented critical problems. * Repair deteriorated levee patrol roads that provide all-weather access to the levees. These roads enable effective emergency response that manages residual flood risks. * Repair minor levee problems proactively, such as erosion sites shorter than 50 feet. The Middle Creek Flood Control Project which provides flood protection to Upper Lake and surrounding areas is eligible for funding under the FSRP. Fortunately, we do not have documented critical problems that qualify for the FSRP; however an assessment of our entire levee system identified 0.72 miles of levee roads which warrant repair. We applied for funding in 2013 for assistance with these repairs. CDWR has approved our application and is proposing funding for repairs totaling $50,709. The Upper Lake area is classified under this grant program as a disadvantaged community and our estimated match would be 10% with the State paying 90%. We will have to pay the entire cost up front but we will be reimbursed the estimated $45,639.00 available from the State match. We have the funds available in the Middle Creek Project operation and maintenance fund (BU#8108) to cover the full cost of this work and then be reimbursed for the State's share. These funds have been in the budget since FY 2014-2015 and are being requested in the FY 2016-2017 budget. The various reporting and Labor Code statutes referenced in the Resolution are regulations we have complied with on numerous occasions in the past and we anticipate no issues with future compliance. Since this project involves routine maintenance, the project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, approve the Project Agreement Between the State of California Department of Water Resources and the Lake County Watershed Protection District for LCWPD - Levee Patrol Road Gravel Repair in the amount of $45,639.00, and authorize the Chair to sign. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): The Upper Lake area is classified under this grant program as a disadvantaged community and our estimated match would be 10% with the State paying 90%. We will have to pay the entire cost up front but we will be reimbursed the estimated $45,639.00 available from the State match. We have the funds available in the Middle Creek Project operation and maintenance fund (BU#8108) to cover the full cost of this work and then be reimbursed for the State's share. These funds have been in the budget since FY 2014-2015 and are being requested in the FY 2016-2017 budget. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, approve the Project Agreement Between the State of California Department of Water Resources and the Lake County Watershed Protection District for LCWPD - Levee Patrol Road Gravel Repair in the amount of $45,639.00, and authorize the Chair to sign.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District FROM: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director DATE: May 24, 2016 SUBJECT: Approval of the Project Agreement Between the State of California Department of Water Resources and the Lake County Watershed Protection District for LCWPD - Levee Patrol Road Gravel Repair EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) has developed the Flood System Repair Project (FSRP) to help Local Maintaining Agencies (LMAs) reduce flood risks in non-urban areas. Through FSRP, DWR will assist LMAs by providing them with technical and financial support to repair documented critical problems with flood control facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control (SPFC) in non-urban areas. The objectives of the FSRP are to: * Repair documented critical problems. * Repair deteriorated levee patrol roads that provide all-weather access to the levees. These roads enable effective emergency response that manages residual flood risks. * Repair minor levee problems proactively, such as erosion sites shorter than 50 feet. The Middle Creek Flood Control Project which provides flood protection to Upper Lake and surrounding areas is eligible for funding under the FSRP. Fortunately, we do not have documented critical problems that qualify for the FSRP; however an assessment of our entire levee system identified 0.72 miles of levee roads which warrant repair. We applied for funding in 2013 for assistance with these repairs. CDWR has approved our application and is proposing funding for repairs totaling $50,709. The Upper Lake area is classified under this grant program as a disadvantaged community and our estimated match would be 10% with the State paying 90%. We will have to pay the entire cost up front but we will be reimbursed the estimated $45,639.00 available from the State match. We have the funds available in the Middle Creek Project operation and maintenance fund (BU#8108) to cover the full cost of this work and then be reimbursed for the State's share. These funds have been in the budget since FY 2014-2015 and are being requested in the FY 2016-2017 budget. The various reporting and Labor Code statutes referenced in the Resolution are regulations we have complied with on numerous occasions in the past and we anticipate no issues with future compliance. Since this project involves routine maintenance, the project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, approve the Project Agreement Between the State of California Department of Water Resources and the Lake County Watershed Protection District for LCWPD - Levee Patrol Road Gravel Repair in the amount of $45,639.00, and authorize the Chair to sign. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): The Upper Lake area is classified under this grant program as a disadvantaged community and our estimated match would be 10% with the State paying 90%. We will have to pay the entire cost up front but we will be reimbursed the estimated $45,639.00 available from the State match. We have the funds available in the Middle Creek Project operation and maintenance fund (BU#8108) to cover the full cost of this work and then be reimbursed for the State's share. These funds have been in the budget since FY 2014-2015 and are being requested in the FY 2016-2017 budget. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, approve the Project Agreement Between the State of California Department of Water Resources and the Lake County Watershed Protection District for LCWPD - Levee Patrol Road Gravel Repair in the amount of $45,639.00, and authorize the Chair to sign.
On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved the Consent Agenda Items 7.1 through 7.15. The motion carried by the following vote:

8. Timed Items

8.19:05 A.M. - Public Input
Clerk’s notes: There was no public input.
8.29:06 A.M. - Swearing in ceremony for Deputy Sheriffs Scott Berger, Joseph Lyons, Anthony Garber, Nathaniel Newton and Correctional Officer Dominic Robles. Ceremonial Item
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 · To: Rob Brown, Chairman · From: Brian L. Martin, Sheriff/Coroner · Subject: Request for timed item for a swearing in ceremony for four Deputy Sheriffs and one Correctional Officer

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Sheriff's Department requests 10 minutes at the June 7th Board of Supervisors meeting for a swearing in ceremony for Deputy Sheriffs Scott Berger, Joseph Lyons , Anthony Garber, Nathaniel Newton and Correctional Officer Dominic Robles. FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:

No additional funding requested — the memo's cost fields were left blank, which on this form means the item is already budgeted.

Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Rob Brown, Chairman FROM: Brian L. Martin, Sheriff/Coroner DATE: May 24, 2016 SUBJECT: Request for timed item for a swearing in ceremony for four Deputy Sheriffs and one Correctional Officer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Sheriff's Department requests 10 minutes at the June 7th Board of Supervisors meeting for a swearing in ceremony for Deputy Sheriffs Scott Berger, Joseph Lyons , Anthony Garber, Nathaniel Newton and Correctional Officer Dominic Robles. FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: N/A Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Clerk’s notes: Sheriff Martin conducted the Oath of Office for Deputy Sheriffs Scott Berger, Joseph Lyons, Anthony Garber, Nathaniel Newton and Correctional Officer Dominic Robles. The Supervisors congratulated and welcomed the officers to Lake County.
8.39:10 A.M. - (a) Presentation of Proclamation Commending Joey Brodnik for Volunteer Efforts to the Lake County Residents Affected by the Valley Fire; (b) Presentation of Proclamation Commending Lori and Gene Thornton for Volunteer Efforts to the Lake County Residents Affected by the Valley Fire; (c) Presentation of Proclamation Commending Sharon Thornton for Volunteer Efforts to the Lake County Residents Affected by the Valley Fire. Proclamation
Clerk’s notes: Supervisor Comstock read the proclamations into record and presented them to (a) Joey Brodnik; (b) Lori and Gene Thornton; and (c) Sharon Thornton. Sheriff Martin spoke.
8.49:15 A.M. - Renewal of Proclamation of Local Health Emergency Proclamation approved — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: June 7, 2016 · To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS · From: Karen Tait, M.D., Health Officer · Subject: Renewal of Proclamation of Local Health Emergency

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Due to the ongoing removal of hazardous materials and remediation of burned properties associated with the Rocky, Jerusalem and Valley wildfires of 2015, I am recommending renewal of the Proclamation of a Local Health Emergency, which was first initiated on September 22, 2015. Because, as the result of an unavoidable absence, I am unable to attend the Board of Supervisors session in person on June 7, 2016, this memo serves as my formal recommendation. Lake County Health Services Department Director, Jim Brown, and Environmental Health Director Ray Ruminski, will be available to field questions on the status of the clean-up activities. FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: N/A Amount Budgeted: N/A Additional Requested:N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/A FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Karen Tait, M.D., Health Officer DATE: June 7, 2016 SUBJECT: Renewal of Proclamation of Local Health Emergency EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Due to the ongoing removal of hazardous materials and remediation of burned properties associated with the Rocky, Jerusalem and Valley wildfires of 2015, I am recommending renewal of the Proclamation of a Local Health Emergency, which was first initiated on September 22, 2015. Because, as the result of an unavoidable absence, I am unable to attend the Board of Supervisors session in person on June 7, 2016, this memo serves as my formal recommendation. Lake County Health Services Department Director, Jim Brown, and Environmental Health Director Ray Ruminski, will be available to field questions on the status of the clean-up activities. FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: N/A Amount Budgeted: N/A Additional Requested:N/A Annual Cost (if planned for future years): N/A FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, continued the Proclamation of a Local Health Emergency by the Lake County Health Officer. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Lake County Health Officer Dr. Karen Tait presented the item to the Board recommending the continuation of the Local Health Emergency. Dr. Tait gave statistics and stated they will be back one more time to renew this proclamation. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.59:30 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of Planning Commission's Recommendation of Approval for General Plan Amendment (GPA 14-01) from Community Commercial to Service Commercial and Certification of Mitigated Negative Declaration on approximately 8.5 acres; project located at 5846 Live Oak Drive, Kelseyville (APN 008-061-26); applicant is Doug Bridges Public Hearing approved — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Comstock
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: May 20, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott DeLeon, Interim Community Development Director Prepared by: Keith Gronendyke, Associate Planner · Subject: Bridges General Plan Amendment; GPAP 14-01, IS 14-18 Supervisorial District 5

EXHIBITS: A. Planning Commission Staff Report, IS 14-18 and attachments February 25, 2016 B. Excerpt from Draft Planning Commission Minutes C. Exhibit "A" General Plan Map D. Planning Commission Resolution 14-01 E. Proposed Resolution PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project request is to amend the General Plan designation on a parcel from Community Commercial to Service Commercial. The existing zoning designation of PDC-DR Planned Development Commercial-Design Review Overlay will remain. The primary reason for this proposal is to allow for the development of the property with a 20,000 square foot warehouse type building with 4,000 square feet of attached office space. This project is to develop the subject parcel, as noted above in order to establish a Serve Pro business along with office space for the applicant's construction business. This project was found to be consistent with specific policies and objectives of the County of Lake's General Plan and the Kelseyville Area Plan. Conditions of approval have been added that requires that the applicant submit a complete set of information on current and possible future site development, as these items were lacking with the initial submittal package. The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on February 25, 2016. No other development is proposed for the eight and one-half acre parcel other than the 24,000 square feet of warehouse and office building, which leaves a large portion of the lot undeveloped on a parcel within the Planned Development Commercial Zoning designation. At the Planning Commission meeting, the commissioners were given two options on how to proceed with this application. Option one was to recommend to the Board of Supervisors to approve the General Plan Amendment but continue the use permit application to allow the applicant to gather all of the incomplete submittal materials and schedule a new Planning Commission hearing to review the new materials. Option two was to approve all of the entitlement applications and recommend that the Board of Supervisors also approve the General Plan Amendment. The Planning Commission voted five to zero to approve the Use Permit and to recommend adoption of a mitigated negative declaration and approval of the general plan amendment to the Board of Supervisors. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: A. Adopt a mitigated negative declaration for GPAP 14-01 with the following findings: 1. The uses permitted in the Service Commercial district are generally compatible with the surrounding land uses. 2. This project will not result in the need for increased public services over those required under the existing land use designation. 3. This change in General Plan land use designation will not result in future significant adverse environmental impacts that mitigations cannot be put in place for. A mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. B. Approve GPAP 14-01 for the following reasons: 1. This amendment is generally consistent with the Lake County General Plan and the Kelseyville Area Plan. 2. The uses allowed in the Service Commercial designation can be made compatible with the existing residential and other zoned commercial land uses in the vicinity. 3. This project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts, and a mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. Sample Motions: A. Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration I move that the Board of Supervisors find that on the basis of the Initial Study No. 14-18 prepared by the Planning Division and the mitigation measures which have been added to the project that the General Plan Amendment as applied for by Glenn and Doug Bridges will not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, a mitigated negative declaration shall be adopted with the findings set forth in the Board Memorandum dated May 20, 2016. B. General Plan Amendment Approval I offer the resolution.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott DeLeon, Interim Community Development Director Prepared by: Keith Gronendyke, Associate Planner DATE: May 20, 2016 SUBJECT: Bridges General Plan Amendment; GPAP 14-01, IS 14-18 Supervisorial District 5 EXHIBITS: A. Planning Commission Staff Report, IS 14-18 and attachments February 25, 2016 B. Excerpt from Draft Planning Commission Minutes C. Exhibit "A" General Plan Map D. Planning Commission Resolution 14-01 E. Proposed Resolution PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project request is to amend the General Plan designation on a parcel from Community Commercial to Service Commercial. The existing zoning designation of PDC-DR Planned Development Commercial-Design Review Overlay will remain. The primary reason for this proposal is to allow for the development of the property with a 20,000 square foot warehouse type building with 4,000 square feet of attached office space. This project is to develop the subject parcel, as noted above in order to establish a Serve Pro business along with office space for the applicant's construction business. This project was found to be consistent with specific policies and objectives of the County of Lake's General Plan and the Kelseyville Area Plan. Conditions of approval have been added that requires that the applicant submit a complete set of information on current and possible future site development, as these items were lacking with the initial submittal package. The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on February 25, 2016. No other development is proposed for the eight and one-half acre parcel other than the 24,000 square feet of warehouse and office building, which leaves a large portion of the lot undeveloped on a parcel within the Planned Development Commercial Zoning designation. At the Planning Commission meeting, the commissioners were given two options on how to proceed with this application. Option one was to recommend to the Board of Supervisors to approve the General Plan Amendment but continue the use permit application to allow the applicant to gather all of the incomplete submittal materials and schedule a new Planning Commission hearing to review the new materials. Option two was to approve all of the entitlement applications and recommend that the Board of Supervisors also approve the General Plan Amendment. The Planning Commission voted five to zero to approve the Use Permit and to recommend adoption of a mitigated negative declaration and approval of the general plan amendment to the Board of Supervisors. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: A. Adopt a mitigated negative declaration for GPAP 14-01 with the following findings: 1. The uses permitted in the Service Commercial district are generally compatible with the surrounding land uses. 2. This project will not result in the need for increased public services over those required under the existing land use designation. 3. This change in General Plan land use designation will not result in future significant adverse environmental impacts that mitigations cannot be put in place for. A mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. B. Approve GPAP 14-01 for the following reasons: 1. This amendment is generally consistent with the Lake County General Plan and the Kelseyville Area Plan. 2. The uses allowed in the Service Commercial designation can be made compatible with the existing residential and other zoned commercial land uses in the vicinity. 3. This project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts, and a mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. Sample Motions: A. Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration I move that the Board of Supervisors find that on the basis of the Initial Study No. 14-18 prepared by the Planning Division and the mitigation measures which have been added to the project that the General Plan Amendment as applied for by Glenn and Doug Bridges will not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, a mitigated negative declaration shall be adopted with the findings set forth in the Board Memorandum dated May 20, 2016. B. General Plan Amendment Approval I offer the resolution.
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, approved the General Plan Amendment (GPA 14-01) from Community Commercial to Service Commercial and Certification of Mitigated Negative Declaration on approximately 8.5 acres; project located at 5846 Live Oak Drive, Kelseyville (APN 008-061-26); applicant is Doug Bridges. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: Community Development Associate Planner Keith Gronendyke presented the item to the Board. Principal Planner Audrey Knight was also present. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.69:45 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of Planning Commission's Recommendation of Approval for General Plan Amendment (GPA 15-12) from Agricultural and Community Commercial to Service Commercial; Rezone (RZ 15-04) from "A/C2-DR" Agriculture/Community Commercial-Design Review Combining to "C3-DR" Service Commercial-Design Review Combining; and Certification of Mitigated Negative Declaration on approximately 3.72 acres; project located at 3463 and 3447 Stone Drive, Finley (APNs 008-021-39 & 47); applicant is Jase Harrell Public Hearing Adopted
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott DeLeon, Interim Community Development Director Prepared by: Keith Gronendyke, Associate Planner · Subject: Harrell General Plan Amendment and Rezone; GPA 15-02, RZ 15-04, IS 15-24 Supervisorial District 4

EXHIBITS: A. Planning Commission Staff Report and attachments dated April B. Excerpt from Draft Planning Commission Minutes C. Exhibit "A" Rezone Map D. Exhibit "A" General Plan Map E. Planning Commission Resolution 16-01 F. Proposed Rezone Ordinance G. Proposed Resolution PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project request is to amend the General Plan designation on a parcel located in Finley from its current Agricultural/Community Commercial designation to Service Commercial. And to rezone the parcel from "A/C2-DR", Agricultural/Community Commercial-Design Review; to "C3-DR" Service Commercial-Design Review. A parcel map (PM 15-04) was approved by the Planning Commission for the subject property dividing it into two lots for the purpose of developing each with service commercial type businesses, such as auto body repair and roto-rooter businesses. The parcel map will not be formally approved if this General Plan Amendment and Rezone application is not approved by the Board, as the parcel could not be subdivided under its existing General Plan and Zoning designations. At the fifteen minute Planning Commission hearing, one resident spoke against the project, as detailed below, while the applicant detailed the current condition of the property and its inability to be agriculturally productive. Additional speakers included a real estate broker and his client who is planning on purchasing one of the parcels to establish the above mentioned plumbing type business. One issue brought up at the Planning Commission meeting was the apparent loss of agriculturally zoned and land uses in and around the community of Finley. This 3.72 acre parcel does have an untended walnut orchard on a portion of the property and there are other agricultural uses to the west, but there is a service commercial use to the east (a roof truss manufacturing facility) and residential and community commercial uses to the south. This site also is located along Stone Drive, which is considered a main collector roadway connecting State Highway 29 and Soda Bay Road. Additional concerns were brought up concerning the proposed uses and the potential for issues concerning odors, noise, traffic, hazardous material spills and aesthetics. As the businesses outlined in the application are just proposals, the true nature of any business cannot be determined until an actual application is submitted either as a subsequent use permit or a building permit. However, the change between the existing zoning categories and the proposed zoning can project potential build-out differences. The County of Lake's Environmental Health Department and Air Quality Department would be informed of the project and they have many rules and regulations for business owners to follow regarding potential impacts to surrounding property owners that would limit any possible environmental degradation or negative health impacts to a less than significant level. This General Plan Amendment and Rezone proposal requires a general plan amendment, rezone and parcel map for the purpose of creating two separate parcels upon which two new service commercial businesses can be established. Employment opportunities for local job creation in the service commercial sector could be generated by this request. This project also was found to be generally consistent with specific policies and objectives of the County of Lake's General Plan and the Lakeport Area Plan. However, the character of the community of Finley would be greatly influenced by this proposed change. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: A. Adopt a negative declaration for GPAP 15-02 and RZ 15-04 with the following findings: 1. This amendment and rezoning is generally consistent with the Lake County General Plan and the Lakeport Area Plan. 2. The uses permitted in the Service Commercial Designation and the "C3-DR" Service Commercial district are potentially compatible with the surrounding land uses. 3 This project may not result in the need for increased public services. (Traffic and other issues are unknown, as they have not been studied). 4. This amendment and rezoning, in and of itself, will not result in any significant adverse environmental impact, although, the loss of agricultural land, land use, and aesthetic change would result, and a mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. B. Approve GPAP 15-02 for the following reasons: 1. This amendment is generally consistent with the Lake County General Plan and the Lakeport Area Plan. Community character has to be weighed with economic progress 2. The uses allowed in the Service Commercial designation are compatible with one of its neighbors across the street that consists of the roof truss manufacturing plant. 3. This project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts, and a mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. C. Approve RZ 15-04 for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is consistent with the Lake County General Plan and the Lakeport Area Plan. 2. The uses allowed in the "C3" Service Commercial district is compatible with existing land uses in the vicinity. 3. This project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impact, and a mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. Sample Motions: A. Proposed Negative Declaration I move that the Board of Supervisors find that on the basis of the Initial Study No. 15-24 prepared by the Planning Division that the General Plan Amendment and Rezone as applied for by Steve Bellah for property owner Jase Harrell will not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, a mitigated negative declaration shall be adopted with the findings set forth in the Board Memorandum dated May 24, 2016. B. General Plan Amendment Approval I offer the resolution. C. Rezone Approval I move that the reading of the ordinance be waived and the title only be read. I offer the ordinance.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott DeLeon, Interim Community Development Director Prepared by: Keith Gronendyke, Associate Planner DATE: May 24, 2016 SUBJECT: Harrell General Plan Amendment and Rezone; GPA 15-02, RZ 15-04, IS 15-24 Supervisorial District 4 EXHIBITS: A. Planning Commission Staff Report and attachments dated April B. Excerpt from Draft Planning Commission Minutes C. Exhibit "A" Rezone Map D. Exhibit "A" General Plan Map E. Planning Commission Resolution 16-01 F. Proposed Rezone Ordinance G. Proposed Resolution PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project request is to amend the General Plan designation on a parcel located in Finley from its current Agricultural/Community Commercial designation to Service Commercial. And to rezone the parcel from "A/C2-DR", Agricultural/Community Commercial-Design Review; to "C3-DR" Service Commercial-Design Review. A parcel map (PM 15-04) was approved by the Planning Commission for the subject property dividing it into two lots for the purpose of developing each with service commercial type businesses, such as auto body repair and roto-rooter businesses. The parcel map will not be formally approved if this General Plan Amendment and Rezone application is not approved by the Board, as the parcel could not be subdivided under its existing General Plan and Zoning designations. At the fifteen minute Planning Commission hearing, one resident spoke against the project, as detailed below, while the applicant detailed the current condition of the property and its inability to be agriculturally productive. Additional speakers included a real estate broker and his client who is planning on purchasing one of the parcels to establish the above mentioned plumbing type business. One issue brought up at the Planning Commission meeting was the apparent loss of agriculturally zoned and land uses in and around the community of Finley. This 3.72 acre parcel does have an untended walnut orchard on a portion of the property and there are other agricultural uses to the west, but there is a service commercial use to the east (a roof truss manufacturing facility) and residential and community commercial uses to the south. This site also is located along Stone Drive, which is considered a main collector roadway connecting State Highway 29 and Soda Bay Road. Additional concerns were brought up concerning the proposed uses and the potential for issues concerning odors, noise, traffic, hazardous material spills and aesthetics. As the businesses outlined in the application are just proposals, the true nature of any business cannot be determined until an actual application is submitted either as a subsequent use permit or a building permit. However, the change between the existing zoning categories and the proposed zoning can project potential build-out differences. The County of Lake's Environmental Health Department and Air Quality Department would be informed of the project and they have many rules and regulations for business owners to follow regarding potential impacts to surrounding property owners that would limit any possible environmental degradation or negative health impacts to a less than significant level. This General Plan Amendment and Rezone proposal requires a general plan amendment, rezone and parcel map for the purpose of creating two separate parcels upon which two new service commercial businesses can be established. Employment opportunities for local job creation in the service commercial sector could be generated by this request. This project also was found to be generally consistent with specific policies and objectives of the County of Lake's General Plan and the Lakeport Area Plan. However, the character of the community of Finley would be greatly influenced by this proposed change. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: A. Adopt a negative declaration for GPAP 15-02 and RZ 15-04 with the following findings: 1. This amendment and rezoning is generally consistent with the Lake County General Plan and the Lakeport Area Plan. 2. The uses permitted in the Service Commercial Designation and the "C3-DR" Service Commercial district are potentially compatible with the surrounding land uses. 3 This project may not result in the need for increased public services. (Traffic and other issues are unknown, as they have not been studied). 4. This amendment and rezoning, in and of itself, will not result in any significant adverse environmental impact, although, the loss of agricultural land, land use, and aesthetic change would result, and a mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. B. Approve GPAP 15-02 for the following reasons: 1. This amendment is generally consistent with the Lake County General Plan and the Lakeport Area Plan. Community character has to be weighed with economic progress 2. The uses allowed in the Service Commercial designation are compatible with one of its neighbors across the street that consists of the roof truss manufacturing plant. 3. This project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts, and a mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. C. Approve RZ 15-04 for the following reasons: 1. This rezoning is consistent with the Lake County General Plan and the Lakeport Area Plan. 2. The uses allowed in the "C3" Service Commercial district is compatible with existing land uses in the vicinity. 3. This project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impact, and a mitigated negative declaration has been recommended. Sample Motions: A. Proposed Negative Declaration I move that the Board of Supervisors find that on the basis of the Initial Study No. 15-24 prepared by the Planning Division that the General Plan Amendment and Rezone as applied for by Steve Bellah for property owner Jase Harrell will not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, a mitigated negative declaration shall be adopted with the findings set forth in the Board Memorandum dated May 24, 2016. B. General Plan Amendment Approval I offer the resolution. C. Rezone Approval I move that the reading of the ordinance be waived and the title only be read. I offer the ordinance.
Supervisor Farrington offered the resolution and it was passed by roll call vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock On motion of Supervisor Farrington and by vote of the Board (5 ayes), waived the reading of the ordinance, to be read in title only (Clerk did so). Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock Supervisor Farrington offered Ordinance No. 3044, and it was passed by roll call vote (5 ayes). Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock
Clerk’s notes: Community Development Associate Planner Keith Gronendyke presented the item to the Board. Principal Planner Audrey Knight was also present. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.710:00 A.M. - PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of Planning Commission's recommendation of approval for a Two-Year Extension of Time (GPD EX 15-01) for Amended General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05) known as Cristallago Vineyards; applicant is Cristallago Development Corporation; project located at 3595, 3851, 3907, 4051, 4141, 4151, 4161, 4283, 4483, 4637 & 4687 Hill Road and 3580 Scotts Valley Road, Lakeport (APNs 003-046-66 & 67, 005-009-04, 05, 06 & 07, 005-010-05, 16 & 17, 005-011-06 & 07 and 005-012-33) Public Hearing approved — Pass
Carried 4-1 — moved by Farrington
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: nay
Carried 4-1 — moved by Farrington
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: nay
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Cristallago Vineyards Project Description, Amended April 10, 2016 2. Addendum to FEIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) 3. Hydrology and Water Quality Mitigation Measures 4. Modified Conditions of Approval (GPD 05-05, MMU 10-05) 5. Proposed Grading Permit (GR 14-009) Conditions · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Scott De Leon, Interim Community Development Director Prepared by: Joshua Dorris, Associate Planner · Subject: Two-year extension of time (GPD EX 15-01) Amendment to the General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06), and Addendum to Certified FEIR associated with GPD 05-05 Supervisor District 4

I. SUMMARY The Cristallago Project (GPD 05-05) was approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 2, 2010, and entailed a mixed-use golf resort, residential and planned development on approximately 860 acres. The Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report for the Project was certified by the BOS on March 2, 2010. Following EIR certification, the Sierra Club filed a case with the Lake County Superior Court. A Settlement Agreement between the County and Sierra Club was subsequently reached. A minor modification to the Conditions of Approval was approved on January 25, 2011. Based on the time and investment in this project, between 2005 and final adoption in 2011, the Planning Director deemed the Project as vested. In July 2014 the applicant applied for a grading permit to construct 292 acres of vineyard. With this application, it was determined that the applicant was not going to move forward with the golf course as previously planned. Due to economic conditions, a downturn in the golf industry, and other factors, the Project did not materialize as originally envisioned. Upon further discussion with the applicant, a revised plan of development was proposed in May 2015, as well as a formal time extension (GPD EX 15-01) to the GPD. The Project Description was amended to substitute vineyards and wine making as the focus of the resort. At its April 28, 2016 public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the project and recommended approval to the Board of Supervisors of the two-year extension of time (GPD EX 15-010), and the Amended General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06). During the April 28, 2016 Planning Commission's Public Hearing, several neighbors as well as the Sierra Club commented. In summary, a concern was raised relating to the hydrology and the wells' ability to provide sufficient vineyard water supply. Another concern was for the existing abundant wildlife and their ability to safely pass between the open space areas throughout the project. A concern was brought up by a neighbor who was under the impression that there would be no development at the site and bought a parcel adjacent to the project. An additional comment received stated "same ball of mud with a different ribbon". Another person raised concerns about the biology and incompatibilities between the agricultural and residential uses. The purpose of this hearing is for the Board of Supervisors to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval for the Amended Cristallago Vineyards project, as well as a two-year extension of time (GPD EX 15-01) for the amended General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06), and the associated Addendum to the certified FEIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009). Changes from Original General Plan of Development: Original * 187-acre golf course * 587 acres of Open Space with 366 acres of Nature Preserve * 650 single family lots o 506 lots from 6K to 9K sq. ft. o 100 lots from 15K to 20K sq. ft. o 44 lots from 25K to 40K sq. f.t * 25,000 sq. ft. clubhouse/Tuscan Hillside Village * 325 resort units at a density of 5.7 units/acre * Entryway Commercial Center Proposed * 292 acres of vineyards * 624 acres of Open Space with 300 acres of Nature Preserve * 475 single family lots o 295 lots from 6K to 9K sq. ft. o 180 lots from, 9K to 20K sq. ft. * 17,000 sq. ft. "Wine Village" * 325 resort units at a density of 8.27 units/acre * Elimination of Entryway Commercial Center The applicant proposes Phase 1 of the Project to entail preparing, planting and farming the vineyards only. The Project build-out would be phased over a 15 to 20 year period. The amended GPD also entails a request for a two-year extension of time to allow Phase 1 of the Project to begin, and a Development Agreement with the County for all Phases of development to be executed. Grading Permit GR 14-009 The applicant applied for a grading permit (GR 14-009) and, pending approval of the amended GPD and associated addendum to the EIR, a grading plan would be submitted. Attachment 6 is an example of the conditions of approval required for the grading permit. II. PROJECT SITE INFORMATION Applicants: Cristallago Development Corporation, 891 Hazel Street, Gridley, CA 95948 Matt Boeger, President Mark Mitchell, CEO Owners: Rocky Liao, 2750 Foothill Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 Richard & Kimberly Evans, 939 Yaple Court, Ripon, CA 95366 Mitch & Lynda Adams, 939 Yaple Court, Ripon, CA 95366 JP Morgan Chase Bank, Jacksonville, FL 32256 Gerald & Constance Mitchell, 17401 Boice Ln., Fort Bragg, CA 95437 Location: 3595, 3851, 3907, 4051, 4141, 4151, 4161, 4283, 4483, 4637 and 4687 Hill Road, Lakeport Existing Uses & Improvements: The site consists of 11 parcels comprising approximately 860 acres. The existing land uses consist of private residences, seasonal cattle grazing and the current owners' recreational uses. The southernmost portion of the project site has been used as a cattle ranch and includes several residences, a pool, and multiple agricultural outbuildings near the southwest portion of the site (APN 005-010-16, 3851 Hill Rd). In order to approve the Amendment to the GPD (MMU 15-06), the following findings must be made: 15.27 Alternative performance and development standards: The development standards of those districts identified in Section 15.5; the performance standards of Section 15.3; or the development standards of this district, Section 15.21 through 15.26, may be amended as set forth herein. (Ord. No. 1749, 7/7/1988) (a) The approval of any general plan of development which proposes alternative performance or development standards shall be recommended by not less than a majority vote of the total membership of the Planning Commission and approved by the Board of Supervisors with a finding that such alternative performance or development standards will produce one or more of the results set forth in Subsection (c). (b) The approval of any specific plan which proposes alternative performance or development standards shall require a majority vote of the total membership of the Review Authority with a finding that such alternative performance or development standards in compliance with those alternative standards as provided in Subsection (a) and will produce one or more of the results set forth in Subsection (c). (c) Results of implementing alternative standards: 1. Reduces the area and unsightliness of cut and fill banks; 2. Reduces the danger of erosion; 3. Creates improvements or permits the use of techniques which will produce a more desirable and accessible development than can be obtained by strict compliance with said minimum requirements. 4. Provides cost-effective services and/or energy efficient development. 5. Establishes compatibility with surrounding residential, commercial, or other development. 6. Provides for a circulation system which is suitable and adequate to serve the proposed uses. The vineyards would potentially disturb less land area than the extensive contouring required for a golf course. The Project also proposes 175 fewer homes, roughly 50 acres more of open space and potentially less commercial activity than the previous Project. As this Project is still in the development phases, a specific plan of development has not yet been prepared for the entire Project and will be required with a development agreement in the next few years. Prior to issuance of any development permits, a use permit for specific plan of development shall be approved by the Lake County Planning Commission. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Hydrology and Water Quality The approved Project was initially proposed to utilize grey water from County Service Area 21 (CSA 21) to irrigate the golf course. However, the effluent at the time of the initial project was already dedicated to the Geysers Geothermal Project. Water for Phase 1 is proposed to be supplied from three, existing, developed onsite wells. The applicant provided a Water Supply Preliminary Assessment detailing vineyard irrigation demands and impacts to the hydrology and surface water. Total demand is estimated at 243 acre-feet/year, with a peak month irrigation flow requirement of 641 gallons per minute (GPM) average over the month. The project site has five existing deep wells that tap into a large aquifer that has been determined to be independent from the Scott's Valley aquifer. Three of the best producing wells are permanently developed with casings and pumps with a combined capacity of 1234 GPM, in excess of the 641 GPM required to provide a peak month irrigation flow rate. With only two of the three wells, the 641 GPM can be achieved. The wells will be the water supply source for the vineyard plantings only. Water supply for the subsequent phases will be from CSA 21. The water purchase agreement with Yolo County allots up to 2800 acre-feet/year to the CSA. A portion of the Project is within the CSA and the entire site will be annexed in to provide water service. The approved Hydrology and Water Quality Mitigation Measures for the Approved GDP were analyzed and found adequate for the revised project. See Attachment 3, Hydrology and Water Quality Mitigation Measures. Land Use The vineyard, residential and resort uses are consistent with the existing zoning designations of PDR (Planned Development Residential) and PDC (Planned Development Commercial) which encourages creative land uses not permitted in other zoning districts. Additionally, the FEIR certified for Cristallago is a Programmatic EIR, requiring further environmental analysis at the point of Specific Development Plans. Applicable CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 - When an Addendum is Required. Section 15164(a) states that a lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously-certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred (Attachment 2). An addendum to the Cristallago EIR is appropriate because the proposed Cristallago Vineyards General Plan of Development (GPD) would not result in any of the conditions that would require the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR under Section 15162. Because the GPD would not allow for any development that was not thoroughly evaluated in the Cristallago Project EIR, the changes would not result in new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the environmental impacts identified and addressed in the EIR. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that would require major revisions of the EIR. No known new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously-identified significant impacts is foreseen. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the previous certification, has come to light showing that the GPD will have new or more severe effects, that mitigation measures that were previously infeasible are now feasible, or that new mitigation measures would substantially reduce one or more significant effects. As a result, none of the conditions requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR under Section 15162 are present. Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines requires a lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously-certified EIR if some changes or additions to that EIR are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 have occurred. The proposed changes to the GPD do not increase the area of impact nor the environmental impacts identified in the original Cristallago Project EIR. A subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required to approve the proposed amendment to the Cristallago Vineyards GPD. Site Plan August 2006 Site Plan April 2016 ..Recommended Action IV. SAMPLE MOTIONS The Board of Supervisors can take the following actions and make the following findings: A. Approval for the proposed two-year extension of time (GPD EX 15-01). Approval of the proposed modification to the Adopted General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06) changing the primary focus from golf course to vineyards in the mixed use, residential and destination resort community, Cristallago Vineyards, with the following findings: 1. MMU 15-06 amending GPD 05-05 is in conformance with the overall General Plan of Development, Lakeport Area Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The conditions of approval and mitigation measures for GPD 05-05 are adequate for the amended GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06. 3. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the County of Lake for installation and maintenance of infrastructure improvements and services within the two-year time extension granted, June 7, 2016. B. Approval for the addendum to the EIR for amended GPD 05-05, with the following findings: 1. Potential environmental impacts have been mitigated by EIR (SCH #2007072013, August 2009). Certification of Addendum to the Cristallago EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) I move that the Board of Supervisors find that on the basis of the Addendum prepared by the Planning Division for the General Plan of Development as amended, will not have any additional significant effect on the environment from the impacts previously analyzed and mitigated, and, therefore, approve an Addendum to the adopted EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) for the Cristallago mixed use project, with the findings listed in the staff report dated June 7, 2016. General Plan of Development Amendment I move that the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the environmental effects of the changes set forth in the proposed Addendum to the Cristallago EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) prepared for this project, and that the Board of Supervisors approve the proposed Amendment to GDP 05-05 (MMU 15-16) for reasons listed in the staff report dated May 24, 2016. General Plan of Development Extension I move that the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the environmental effects of the changes set forth in the proposed Addendum to the Cristallago EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) prepared for this project, and that the Board of Supervisors approve the proposed time extension (GPD EX 15-01) for reasons listed in the staff report dated May 24, 2016. NOTE: The applicant or any interested person is reminded that the California Environmental Quality Act provides for a seven (7) calendar day appeal period. If there is a disagreement with the Board of Supervisors, a case may be filed with the Lake County Superior Court prior to 5:00 p.m. on or before the seventh calendar day following the Board of Supervisors' final determination.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Scott De Leon, Interim Community Development Director Prepared by: Joshua Dorris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Two-year extension of time (GPD EX 15-01) Amendment to the General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06), and Addendum to Certified FEIR associated with GPD 05-05 Supervisor District 4 DATE: May 24, 2016 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Cristallago Vineyards Project Description, Amended April 10, 2016 2. Addendum to FEIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) 3. Hydrology and Water Quality Mitigation Measures 4. Modified Conditions of Approval (GPD 05-05, MMU 10-05) 5. Proposed Grading Permit (GR 14-009) Conditions I. SUMMARY The Cristallago Project (GPD 05-05) was approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 2, 2010, and entailed a mixed-use golf resort, residential and planned development on approximately 860 acres. The Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report for the Project was certified by the BOS on March 2, 2010. Following EIR certification, the Sierra Club filed a case with the Lake County Superior Court. A Settlement Agreement between the County and Sierra Club was subsequently reached. A minor modification to the Conditions of Approval was approved on January 25, 2011. Based on the time and investment in this project, between 2005 and final adoption in 2011, the Planning Director deemed the Project as vested. In July 2014 the applicant applied for a grading permit to construct 292 acres of vineyard. With this application, it was determined that the applicant was not going to move forward with the golf course as previously planned. Due to economic conditions, a downturn in the golf industry, and other factors, the Project did not materialize as originally envisioned. Upon further discussion with the applicant, a revised plan of development was proposed in May 2015, as well as a formal time extension (GPD EX 15-01) to the GPD. The Project Description was amended to substitute vineyards and wine making as the focus of the resort. At its April 28, 2016 public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the project and recommended approval to the Board of Supervisors of the two-year extension of time (GPD EX 15-010), and the Amended General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06). During the April 28, 2016 Planning Commission's Public Hearing, several neighbors as well as the Sierra Club commented. In summary, a concern was raised relating to the hydrology and the wells' ability to provide sufficient vineyard water supply. Another concern was for the existing abundant wildlife and their ability to safely pass between the open space areas throughout the project. A concern was brought up by a neighbor who was under the impression that there would be no development at the site and bought a parcel adjacent to the project. An additional comment received stated "same ball of mud with a different ribbon". Another person raised concerns about the biology and incompatibilities between the agricultural and residential uses. The purpose of this hearing is for the Board of Supervisors to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval for the Amended Cristallago Vineyards project, as well as a two-year extension of time (GPD EX 15-01) for the amended General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06), and the associated Addendum to the certified FEIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009). Changes from Original General Plan of Development: Original * 187-acre golf course * 587 acres of Open Space with 366 acres of Nature Preserve * 650 single family lots o 506 lots from 6K to 9K sq. ft. o 100 lots from 15K to 20K sq. ft. o 44 lots from 25K to 40K sq. f.t * 25,000 sq. ft. clubhouse/Tuscan Hillside Village * 325 resort units at a density of 5.7 units/acre * Entryway Commercial Center Proposed * 292 acres of vineyards * 624 acres of Open Space with 300 acres of Nature Preserve * 475 single family lots o 295 lots from 6K to 9K sq. ft. o 180 lots from, 9K to 20K sq. ft. * 17,000 sq. ft. "Wine Village" * 325 resort units at a density of 8.27 units/acre * Elimination of Entryway Commercial Center The applicant proposes Phase 1 of the Project to entail preparing, planting and farming the vineyards only. The Project build-out would be phased over a 15 to 20 year period. The amended GPD also entails a request for a two-year extension of time to allow Phase 1 of the Project to begin, and a Development Agreement with the County for all Phases of development to be executed. Grading Permit GR 14-009 The applicant applied for a grading permit (GR 14-009) and, pending approval of the amended GPD and associated addendum to the EIR, a grading plan would be submitted. Attachment 6 is an example of the conditions of approval required for the grading permit. II. PROJECT SITE INFORMATION Applicants: Cristallago Development Corporation, 891 Hazel Street, Gridley, CA 95948 Matt Boeger, President Mark Mitchell, CEO Owners: Rocky Liao, 2750 Foothill Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 Richard & Kimberly Evans, 939 Yaple Court, Ripon, CA 95366 Mitch & Lynda Adams, 939 Yaple Court, Ripon, CA 95366 JP Morgan Chase Bank, Jacksonville, FL 32256 Gerald & Constance Mitchell, 17401 Boice Ln., Fort Bragg, CA 95437 Location: 3595, 3851, 3907, 4051, 4141, 4151, 4161, 4283, 4483, 4637 and 4687 Hill Road, Lakeport Existing Uses & Improvements: The site consists of 11 parcels comprising approximately 860 acres. The existing land uses consist of private residences, seasonal cattle grazing and the current owners' recreational uses. The southernmost portion of the project site has been used as a cattle ranch and includes several residences, a pool, and multiple agricultural outbuildings near the southwest portion of the site (APN 005-010-16, 3851 Hill Rd). In order to approve the Amendment to the GPD (MMU 15-06), the following findings must be made: 15.27 Alternative performance and development standards: The development standards of those districts identified in Section 15.5; the performance standards of Section 15.3; or the development standards of this district, Section 15.21 through 15.26, may be amended as set forth herein. (Ord. No. 1749, 7/7/1988) (a) The approval of any general plan of development which proposes alternative performance or development standards shall be recommended by not less than a majority vote of the total membership of the Planning Commission and approved by the Board of Supervisors with a finding that such alternative performance or development standards will produce one or more of the results set forth in Subsection (c). (b) The approval of any specific plan which proposes alternative performance or development standards shall require a majority vote of the total membership of the Review Authority with a finding that such alternative performance or development standards in compliance with those alternative standards as provided in Subsection (a) and will produce one or more of the results set forth in Subsection (c). (c) Results of implementing alternative standards: 1. Reduces the area and unsightliness of cut and fill banks; 2. Reduces the danger of erosion; 3. Creates improvements or permits the use of techniques which will produce a more desirable and accessible development than can be obtained by strict compliance with said minimum requirements. 4. Provides cost-effective services and/or energy efficient development. 5. Establishes compatibility with surrounding residential, commercial, or other development. 6. Provides for a circulation system which is suitable and adequate to serve the proposed uses. The vineyards would potentially disturb less land area than the extensive contouring required for a golf course. The Project also proposes 175 fewer homes, roughly 50 acres more of open space and potentially less commercial activity than the previous Project. As this Project is still in the development phases, a specific plan of development has not yet been prepared for the entire Project and will be required with a development agreement in the next few years. Prior to issuance of any development permits, a use permit for specific plan of development shall be approved by the Lake County Planning Commission. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Hydrology and Water Quality The approved Project was initially proposed to utilize grey water from County Service Area 21 (CSA 21) to irrigate the golf course. However, the effluent at the time of the initial project was already dedicated to the Geysers Geothermal Project. Water for Phase 1 is proposed to be supplied from three, existing, developed onsite wells. The applicant provided a Water Supply Preliminary Assessment detailing vineyard irrigation demands and impacts to the hydrology and surface water. Total demand is estimated at 243 acre-feet/year, with a peak month irrigation flow requirement of 641 gallons per minute (GPM) average over the month. The project site has five existing deep wells that tap into a large aquifer that has been determined to be independent from the Scott's Valley aquifer. Three of the best producing wells are permanently developed with casings and pumps with a combined capacity of 1234 GPM, in excess of the 641 GPM required to provide a peak month irrigation flow rate. With only two of the three wells, the 641 GPM can be achieved. The wells will be the water supply source for the vineyard plantings only. Water supply for the subsequent phases will be from CSA 21. The water purchase agreement with Yolo County allots up to 2800 acre-feet/year to the CSA. A portion of the Project is within the CSA and the entire site will be annexed in to provide water service. The approved Hydrology and Water Quality Mitigation Measures for the Approved GDP were analyzed and found adequate for the revised project. See Attachment 3, Hydrology and Water Quality Mitigation Measures. Land Use The vineyard, residential and resort uses are consistent with the existing zoning designations of PDR (Planned Development Residential) and PDC (Planned Development Commercial) which encourages creative land uses not permitted in other zoning districts. Additionally, the FEIR certified for Cristallago is a Programmatic EIR, requiring further environmental analysis at the point of Specific Development Plans. Applicable CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 - When an Addendum is Required. Section 15164(a) states that a lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously-certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred (Attachment 2). An addendum to the Cristallago EIR is appropriate because the proposed Cristallago Vineyards General Plan of Development (GPD) would not result in any of the conditions that would require the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR under Section 15162. Because the GPD would not allow for any development that was not thoroughly evaluated in the Cristallago Project EIR, the changes would not result in new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of the environmental impacts identified and addressed in the EIR. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that would require major revisions of the EIR. No known new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously-identified significant impacts is foreseen. No new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the previous certification, has come to light showing that the GPD will have new or more severe effects, that mitigation measures that were previously infeasible are now feasible, or that new mitigation measures would substantially reduce one or more significant effects. As a result, none of the conditions requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR under Section 15162 are present. Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines requires a lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously-certified EIR if some changes or additions to that EIR are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 have occurred. The proposed changes to the GPD do not increase the area of impact nor the environmental impacts identified in the original Cristallago Project EIR. A subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required to approve the proposed amendment to the Cristallago Vineyards GPD. Site Plan August 2006 Site Plan April 2016 ..Recommended Action IV. SAMPLE MOTIONS The Board of Supervisors can take the following actions and make the following findings: A. Approval for the proposed two-year extension of time (GPD EX 15-01). Approval of the proposed modification to the Adopted General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06) changing the primary focus from golf course to vineyards in the mixed use, residential and destination resort community, Cristallago Vineyards, with the following findings: 1. MMU 15-06 amending GPD 05-05 is in conformance with the overall General Plan of Development, Lakeport Area Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The conditions of approval and mitigation measures for GPD 05-05 are adequate for the amended GPD 05-05, MMU 15-06. 3. The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the County of Lake for installation and maintenance of infrastructure improvements and services within the two-year time extension granted, June 7, 2016. B. Approval for the addendum to the EIR for amended GPD 05-05, with the following findings: 1. Potential environmental impacts have been mitigated by EIR (SCH #2007072013, August 2009). Certification of Addendum to the Cristallago EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) I move that the Board of Supervisors find that on the basis of the Addendum prepared by the Planning Division for the General Plan of Development as amended, will not have any additional significant effect on the environment from the impacts previously analyzed and mitigated, and, therefore, approve an Addendum to the adopted EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) for the Cristallago mixed use project, with the findings listed in the staff report dated June 7, 2016. General Plan of Development Amendment I move that the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the environmental effects of the changes set forth in the proposed Addendum to the Cristallago EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) prepared for this project, and that the Board of Supervisors approve the proposed Amendment to GDP 05-05 (MMU 15-16) for reasons listed in the staff report dated May 24, 2016. General Plan of Development Extension I move that the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the environmental effects of the changes set forth in the proposed Addendum to the Cristallago EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) prepared for this project, and that the Board of Supervisors approve the proposed time extension (GPD EX 15-01) for reasons listed in the staff report dated May 24, 2016. NOTE: The applicant or any interested person is reminded that the California Environmental Quality Act provides for a seven (7) calendar day appeal period. If there is a disagreement with the Board of Supervisors, a case may be filed with the Lake County Superior Court prior to 5:00 p.m. on or before the seventh calendar day following the Board of Supervisors' final determination.
On motion of Supervisor Farrington, and by vote of the Board, approved the addendum to the adopted EIR (SCH# 2007072013, August 2009) for the Crisallago mixed use project. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 4 - Comstock, Smith, Farrington and Brown Nay-Supervisors: 1 - Steele On motion of Supervisor Farrington, and by vote of the Board, approved the proposed amendment to GDP 05-05 (MMU 15-16). The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 4 - Comstock, Smith, Farrington and Brown Nay-Supervisors: 1 - Steele On motion of Supervisor Farrington, and by vote of the Board, approved a Two-Year Extension of Time (GPD EX 15-01) for Amended General Plan of Development (GPD 05-05) known as Cristallago Vineyards; applicant is Cristallago Development Corporation; project located at 3595, 3851, 3907, 4051, 4141, 4151, 4161, 4283, 4483, 4637 & 4687 Hill Road and 3580 Scotts Valley Road, Lakeport (APNs 003-046-66 & 67, 005-009-04, 05, 06 & 07, 005-010-05, 16 & 17, 005-011-06 & 07 and 005-012-33). The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Community Development Principal Planner Audrey Knight introduced the item to the Board. Associate Planner Joshua Dorris gave a PowerPoint presentation. Assistant Planner Peggy Barthel was also present. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following people spoke: Victoria Brandon, Ron Rose, Phil Murphy, John Lee, Ken Rickabaugh, Brad Peters and Randy Wilbur. No one else wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
8.810:15 A.M. - Discussion and Consideration of Medical Marijuana Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations to amend Article 72 of the Lake County Code Action Item not acted on
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Medical Marijuana Ad Hoc Committee · Subject: 10:15 A.M. - Discussion and Consideration of Medical Marijuana Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations to amend Article 72 of the Lake County Code EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Per Board action to January 5, 2016 members were appointed to an Ad Hoc Committee to assess the impacts of the State Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act. This committee has met numerous times since its inception and would like to discuss their recommendations to be incorporated in a proposed ordinance.

..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direction to staff to incorporate Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations to amend Article 72 of the Lake County Code
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Medical Marijuana Ad Hoc Committee DATE: May 24, 2016 SUBJECT: 10:15 A.M. - Discussion and Consideration of Medical Marijuana Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations to amend Article 72 of the Lake County Code EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Per Board action to January 5, 2016 members were appointed to an Ad Hoc Committee to assess the impacts of the State Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act. This committee has met numerous times since its inception and would like to discuss their recommendations to be incorporated in a proposed ordinance. ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Direction to staff to incorporate Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations to amend Article 72 of the Lake County Code
No action was taken. The next meeting for discussion on this item will be in front of the Planning Commission on July 14, 2016.
Clerk’s notes: Supervisor Farrington presented the item to the Board. Ad Hoc Committee Members Sheriff Martin and District Attorney Don Anderson were also present and spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following people spoke: Phil Murphy, Brock Faulkner, Ron Dutcher, Ron Green, Terri Larson, Amir Delleri, Michael Green, Pete Cohall, Greg Shell, Lance Williams, Tony Griffins, Jason Jones, Cheryl Carr, John Brosnan, Joe Fernandez.

9. Non-Timed Items

9.1Supervisors’ weekly calendar, travel and reports
9.2Consideration of the Following Appointments: Child Care Planning and Development Council Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) Kelseyville Cemetery District Lake County (IHSS) Public Authority Advisory Committee Appointment approved
Carried 5-0 — moved by Farrington
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 5-0 — moved by Farrington
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 5-0 — moved by Farrington
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Carried 5-0 — moved by Steele
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: May 23, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Sara Shucart, Administrative Assistant · Subject: Consideration of Advisory Board appointments

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Child Care Planning and Development Council - Nine (9) vacancies: Consumer (2), Public Agency (1), Community Representative (2), Discretionary Appointee (2), Child Care Provider (2) Application Received: Jami White - new applicant, Consumer Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) - Eleven (11) vacancies: Community College Districts (1), ER Affiliated-Medical Care Coordinator (2), Private Ambulance Company (1), California Highway Patrol (1), Fire Departments (2), Others - Consumer-Interested Group (2), EMT Representative (2) Applications Received: Jeffery Cress - new applicant, Others - Consumer-Interested Group Deborah Pardee - new applicant, Others - Consumer-Interested Group Kelseyville Cemetery District - One (1) vacancy Application Received: Michael Garrison - new applicant Lake County (IHSS) Public Authority Advisory Committee - Six (6) vacancies: Senior Consumer (3), Disables Consumer (2), Senior Community Representative (1) Application Received: Carol Bettencourt - incumbent, Senior Community Representative FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Sara Shucart, Administrative Assistant DATE: May 23, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration of Advisory Board appointments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Child Care Planning and Development Council - Nine (9) vacancies: Consumer (2), Public Agency (1), Community Representative (2), Discretionary Appointee (2), Child Care Provider (2) Application Received: Jami White - new applicant, Consumer Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) - Eleven (11) vacancies: Community College Districts (1), ER Affiliated-Medical Care Coordinator (2), Private Ambulance Company (1), California Highway Patrol (1), Fire Departments (2), Others - Consumer-Interested Group (2), EMT Representative (2) Applications Received: Jeffery Cress - new applicant, Others - Consumer-Interested Group Deborah Pardee - new applicant, Others - Consumer-Interested Group Kelseyville Cemetery District - One (1) vacancy Application Received: Michael Garrison - new applicant Lake County (IHSS) Public Authority Advisory Committee - Six (6) vacancies: Senior Consumer (3), Disables Consumer (2), Senior Community Representative (1) Application Received: Carol Bettencourt - incumbent, Senior Community Representative FISCAL IMPACT: _x_ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION:
On motion of Supervisor Farrington, and by vote of the Board, appointed Jamie White to the Child Care Planning and Development Council. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock On motion of Supervisor Farrington, and by vote of the Board, appointed Jeffrey Cress and Deborah Pardee to the Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC). The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock On motion of Supervisor Farrington, and by vote of the Board, appointed Michael Garrison to the Kelseyville Cemetery District. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock On motion of Supervisor Steele, and by vote of the Board, appointed Carol Bettencourt to the Lake County (IHSS) Public Authority Advisory Committee. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock
Clerk’s notes: Chair Brown presented the item to the Board. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.3Consideration of Sublease Agreement Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Department of Child Support Services for sublease of the Gard Street School Facility Action Item approved — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 · To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS · From: GAIL WOODWORTH, Child Support Services Director · Subject: Consideration of Sublease Agreement Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Department of Child Support Services for Sublease of the Gard Street School Facility

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Department of Child Support Services, in cooperation with the County's Administration office, requests your Board's approval of the Sublease Agreement between the County of Lake and the Department of Child Support Services. The remodeling of the Gard Street School is almost complete and the department has a move date set for the weekend of July 2, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $10,000/month Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Allocation of sublease payments are as follows: $2,500 to the Kelseyville Unified School District as remuneration for the County's obligation under the lease $6,222.58 to the County General Fund (001) $1,277.42 to the Child Support Services Fund (107) STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Sublease Agreement between the County of Lake and the Lake County Department of Child Support Services for Sublease of the Gard Street School Facility, in the amount of $10,000 per month and authorize the Chair to sign.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: GAIL WOODWORTH, Child Support Services Director DATE: May 24, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration of Sublease Agreement Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Department of Child Support Services for Sublease of the Gard Street School Facility EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Department of Child Support Services, in cooperation with the County's Administration office, requests your Board's approval of the Sublease Agreement between the County of Lake and the Department of Child Support Services. The remodeling of the Gard Street School is almost complete and the department has a move date set for the weekend of July 2, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: $10,000/month Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): Allocation of sublease payments are as follows: $2,500 to the Kelseyville Unified School District as remuneration for the County's obligation under the lease $6,222.58 to the County General Fund (001) $1,277.42 to the Child Support Services Fund (107) STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Sublease Agreement between the County of Lake and the Lake County Department of Child Support Services for Sublease of the Gard Street School Facility, in the amount of $10,000 per month and authorize the Chair to sign.
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, Approved the Sublease Agreement Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Department of Child Support Services for sublease of the Gard Street School Facility. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Due to the nature of the item the Board did not require staff from Child Support Services to be present. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.4Consideration of Approval of Amendment Number Two to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Deputy Sheriff’s Association for calendar years 2014-15 Agreement approved — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Farrington
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: May 26, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Shanda Harry, Deputy County Counsel Sarah Jansen, Deputy Human Resources Director · Subject: Consideration of Approval of Amendment Number Two to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association for calendar years 2014-15

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: After many months of meeting and conferring with representatives of the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association (LCDSA), we present your Board with an Amendment (Number 2) to the memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Association for the calendar years of 2014-15. Amendment with Deputy Sheriff's Association Provided below is a summary of the changes to the terms and conditions as reflected in the attached proposed Amendment to the 2014-15 MOU: 1. Provides for a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment - Retroactive to July 1, 2015 as reflected in the attached salary schedules. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board approve the attached Amendment and Resolution adopting Amendment Number Two to the Memorandum of Understanding with the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association for calendar years 2014-15.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Shanda Harry, Deputy County Counsel Sarah Jansen, Deputy Human Resources Director DATE: May 26, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval of Amendment Number Two to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association for calendar years 2014-15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: After many months of meeting and conferring with representatives of the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association (LCDSA), we present your Board with an Amendment (Number 2) to the memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Association for the calendar years of 2014-15. Amendment with Deputy Sheriff's Association Provided below is a summary of the changes to the terms and conditions as reflected in the attached proposed Amendment to the 2014-15 MOU: 1. Provides for a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment - Retroactive to July 1, 2015 as reflected in the attached salary schedules. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): N/A STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): N/A ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board approve the attached Amendment and Resolution adopting Amendment Number Two to the Memorandum of Understanding with the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association for calendar years 2014-15. Attachments
On motion of Supervisor Farrington, and by vote of the Board, approved Amendment Number Two to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the County of Lake and the Lake County Deputy Sheriff’s Association for calendar years 2014-15. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock Supervisor Farrington offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: County Counsel Shanda Harry presented the item to the Board. Human Resources Deputy Director Sarah Jensen was also present. County Administrative Officer Carol Huchingson and Sheriff Martin also spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.5Consideration of Memorandum of Understanding with the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association and the County of Lake for Calendar Years 2016-2017 Action Item approved — Pass
Carried 5-0 — moved by Smith
Brown: aye Comstock: aye Farrington: aye Smith: aye Steele: aye
Staff memo

Date: May 24, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Shanda Harry, Deputy County Counsel Sarah Jansen, Deputy Human Resources Director · Subject: Consideration of Resolution Adopting Memorandum of Understanding by and Between the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association and the County of Lake for the Term of January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: After many months of meeting and conferring with representatives of the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association (LCDSA), we present your Board with a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Association. MOU with Deputy Sheriff's Association Provided below is a summary of the changes to the terms and conditions as reflected in the attached proposed MOU; 1. Term of 24 months from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. 2. Provides for a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment - Retroactive to July 1, 2015 3. Provides for a 7% Cost of Living Adjustment - Effective May 21, 2016 4. Provides that employees assigned as a SWAT Officer shall receive an additional one percent (1%) of his/her base pay rate during the term of such assignment. Salary Schedules will be attached to this MOU at a later date once approved by the Auditor-Controller. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board adopt resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding with the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association.
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Shanda Harry, Deputy County Counsel Sarah Jansen, Deputy Human Resources Director DATE: May 24, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution Adopting Memorandum of Understanding by and Between the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association and the County of Lake for the Term of January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: After many months of meeting and conferring with representatives of the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association (LCDSA), we present your Board with a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Association. MOU with Deputy Sheriff's Association Provided below is a summary of the changes to the terms and conditions as reflected in the attached proposed MOU; 1. Term of 24 months from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. 2. Provides for a 3% Cost of Living Adjustment - Retroactive to July 1, 2015 3. Provides for a 7% Cost of Living Adjustment - Effective May 21, 2016 4. Provides that employees assigned as a SWAT Officer shall receive an additional one percent (1%) of his/her base pay rate during the term of such assignment. Salary Schedules will be attached to this MOU at a later date once approved by the Auditor-Controller. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends your Board adopt resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding with the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association. Attachments
On motion of Supervisor Smith, and by vote of the Board, approved the Memorandum of Understanding with the Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association and the County of Lake for Calendar Years 2016-2017. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes- Supervisors: 5 - Steele, Farrington, Smith, Brown and Comstock Supervisor Smith offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: County Counsel Shanda Harry presented the item to the Board. Human Resources Deputy Director Sarah Jensen was also present. Sheriff Martin spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak and the following person spoke: John Duree. No one else wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.6Consideration of Approval of Classification And Compensation Committee Findings and Recommendations. Action Item approved — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 17, 2016 · To: The Honorable Board of Supervisors · From: Classification and Compensation Committee By: Sarah Jansen, Deputy Human Resources Director · Subject: Approval of Classification and Compensation Committee Findings and Recommendations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Classification and Compensation has completed the review of reclassification and salary adjustment requests that were submitted for FY 2016-2017. The Committee met, reviewed and discussed the requests, and made Committee recommendations. Below you will find a list of the in-cycle requests that were received by the Committee, the Committee's recommendation for each request and the reason(s) for the Committee's determination. Assessor-Recorder Deputy Assessor-Recorder I/II/III/IV/Supervising salary increase The Assessor-Recorder's Office requested a salary adjustment for the full Deputy Assessor-Recorder class series. Proposed Grades and entry steps: Deputy Assessor-Recorder I: Grade A11 $13.09 / hr Deputy Assessor-Recorder II: Grade A13 $14.43 / hr Deputy Assessor-Recorder III: Grade A15 $15.91 / hr Deputy Assessor-Recorder IV: Grade A17 $17.54 / hr Deputy Assessor-Recorder, Supv: Grade B19 $19.82 / hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends approving the salary adjustment request for the Deputy Assessor-Recorder I/II/III provided that the Deputy Assessor-Recorder IV is eliminated. The Committee recommends denying the salary adjustment request for the Deputy Assessor-Recorder Supervising. Reasoning: The compensation for the Deputy Assessor-Recorder I/II/III classifications is not appropriate for the scope of work performed. Since the Deputy Assessor-Recorder IV position has not been filled since approximately 2008, and the proposed increase would create internal equity and compaction issues if the IV level is part of the series, the Committee recommended eliminating the classification, which resolves these issues and allows the County to address the compensation issues at the lower levels. The Committee does not support a salary increase for the Deputy Assessor-Recorder, Supervising as the position is appropriately compensated. Cost Information: This increase will result in an increase to the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) Appraiser Aide/I/II/III salary increase The Assessor-Recorder's Office has requested a salary increase for the Appraiser Aide/Appraiser I/II/III class series. Proposed Grade and entry step: Appraiser Aide: Grade A17 $17.54/hr Appraiser I: Grade A19 $19.34/hr Appraiser II: Grade A21 $21.32/hr Appraiser III: Grade A23 $23.51/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to adjust the salary for the Appraiser Aide/Appraiser I/II/III class series. Reasoning: These classifications are appropriately compensated. Child Support Services Child Support Assistant I increase Child Support Officer I/II/III Supervising Child Support Officer Child Support Special Programs Coordinator The Child Support Services Department has requested to increase the salaries for a variety of positions within the department. Proposed Grades and entry step: Child Support Assistant I: Grade A10 $12.47/hr Child Support Officer I: Grade B15 $16.31/hr Child Support Officer II: Grade B17 $17.98/hr Child Support Officer III: Grade B19 $19.82/hr Supv Child Support Officer: Grade A25 $25.92 /hr Child Support Special Programs Coord: Grade B21 $21.85/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to adjust the salary for the classifications listed above. Reasoning: These classifications are appropriately compensated. Community Development Building Inspector I/II to Plans Examiner I/II The Community Development Department has requested to reclassify an existing Building Inspector II to the Plans Examiner I/II class series. Proposed Grade and entry step: Plans Examiner I: Grade B22 $22.95/hr Plans Examiner II: Grade B23 $24.09/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends approving this request. Reasoning: The needs of the department have changed over time, and there is a need for a certified Plans Examiner who can perform these specialized functions. The recent fires have increased the need for the specialized position as the department expects a number of citizens will be rebuilding in addition to the normal workload. Cost Information: Funding for this position in Community Development is self-funded, therefore it will not affect the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) District Attorney District Attorney Investigator I/II and Chief District Attorney Investigator salary adjustment The District Attorney's Office has requested a salary adjustment for the District Attorney Investigator I/II and Chief District Attorney Investigator classifications. Proposed Grade and entry step: DA Investigator I: 626 $27.4681 hr DA Investigator II: B28 $30.75/ hr Chief DA Investigator: C23 $6,758/mo The Committee recommends denying the request to adjust the salary for the classifications listed above. Reasoning: These classifications are appropriately compensated. Public Services Facilities Maintenance Technician salary adjustment The Public Services Department requested to adjust the salary for the Facilities Maintenance Technician. Proposed Grade and entry step: Grade A21 $21.32/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to change the salary of the existing Facilities Maintenance Technician, however, recommends creating a Facilities Maintenance Technician I/II class series with the Facilities Maintenance Technician I tied to the current grade of A19, and the Facilities Maintenance Technician II tied to grade A21. Reasoning: Since this classification may be used in other departments, the Committee was concerned that staff members in those departments do a more limited scope of work. Creating the flex classification will allow the County to ensure that the scope of work appropriate for the compensation. In addition, the Committee was concerned that if vacancies were to occur in the future it would be difficult to attract qualified candidates given the anticipated increase in available construction jobs due to the fires. Cost Information: There will be an increased cost to the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) Sheriff's Office Accountant II to Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator I/II The Sheriff's Office has requested to create a unique Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator I/II class series, and reclassify an existing Accountant II incumbent to the new classification. Proposed Grade and entry step: Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator I: Grade B23 $24.09/hr Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator II: Grade B25 $26.56/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to create a new Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator I/II class series, however, does recommend reclassifying the Accountant II incumbent to a Senior Staff Services Analyst. Reasoning: Over time, the responsibilities of this position have changed, including the need for this position to be supervisory. The Committee believes that the responsibilities of this position, including the supervisory responsibilities are covered by the existing Senior Staff Services Analyst classification. Cost Information: There will be an increased cost to the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) Sheriff-Coroner Administrative Manager salary adjustment The Sheriff's Office requested a salary adjustment for the Sheriff-Coroner Administrative Manager classification. Proposed Grade and entry step: Grade C25 $5,983/mo Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to adjust the salary for the Sheriff-Coroner Administrative Manager classification. Reasoning: The position is properly compensated within the confines of the County salary schedule. Civil Unit Coordinator title and job description change The Sheriff's Office requested a title change from Civil Unit Coordinator to Civil Coordinator, and a change in the minimum qualifications. The department is not proposing to change the salary grade for this position. Current Grade and entry step: Grade 612 $17.0324 Committee Action: The Committee recommends approving the request with no change in salary. Reasoning: The duties of the position have not changed, and the minimum qualifications are still within the appropriate range for the current salary within the constraints of the guidelines used to determine salaries for classifications in the County. Cost Information: There is no change in cost related to this change. (Requires meet and Confer) Veteran's Services Office Veteran's Services Officer salary adjustment The Department of Health Services/Veteran's Services Office requested a salary adjustment for the Veteran's Services Officer classification. Proposed Grade and entry step: Grade A29 $5,460/mo Committee Action: The Committee recommends approving the request to adjust the salary for the Veteran's Services Officer classification. Reasoning: The compensation for this classification is currently not consistent with other County managers. In addition, given the limited pool of individuals qualified for this position, it is in the best interest of the County to increase the salary in an effort to ensure retention of the incumbent. Cost Information: The increased costs will be covered by an increase in Veteran's Subvention funding. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): See above. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff requests that your Board approve in concept these recommendations and authorize the Human Resources Director to initiate the meet and confer process with the applicable employee associations as needed. Thank you for your consideration. cc: Human Resources Director
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Board of Supervisors FROM: Classification and Compensation Committee By: Sarah Jansen, Deputy Human Resources Director DATE: May 17, 2016 SUBJECT: Approval of Classification and Compensation Committee Findings and Recommendations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Classification and Compensation has completed the review of reclassification and salary adjustment requests that were submitted for FY 2016-2017. The Committee met, reviewed and discussed the requests, and made Committee recommendations. Below you will find a list of the in-cycle requests that were received by the Committee, the Committee's recommendation for each request and the reason(s) for the Committee's determination. Assessor-Recorder Deputy Assessor-Recorder I/II/III/IV/Supervising salary increase The Assessor-Recorder's Office requested a salary adjustment for the full Deputy Assessor-Recorder class series. Proposed Grades and entry steps: Deputy Assessor-Recorder I: Grade A11 $13.09 / hr Deputy Assessor-Recorder II: Grade A13 $14.43 / hr Deputy Assessor-Recorder III: Grade A15 $15.91 / hr Deputy Assessor-Recorder IV: Grade A17 $17.54 / hr Deputy Assessor-Recorder, Supv: Grade B19 $19.82 / hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends approving the salary adjustment request for the Deputy Assessor-Recorder I/II/III provided that the Deputy Assessor-Recorder IV is eliminated. The Committee recommends denying the salary adjustment request for the Deputy Assessor-Recorder Supervising. Reasoning: The compensation for the Deputy Assessor-Recorder I/II/III classifications is not appropriate for the scope of work performed. Since the Deputy Assessor-Recorder IV position has not been filled since approximately 2008, and the proposed increase would create internal equity and compaction issues if the IV level is part of the series, the Committee recommended eliminating the classification, which resolves these issues and allows the County to address the compensation issues at the lower levels. The Committee does not support a salary increase for the Deputy Assessor-Recorder, Supervising as the position is appropriately compensated. Cost Information: This increase will result in an increase to the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) Appraiser Aide/I/II/III salary increase The Assessor-Recorder's Office has requested a salary increase for the Appraiser Aide/Appraiser I/II/III class series. Proposed Grade and entry step: Appraiser Aide: Grade A17 $17.54/hr Appraiser I: Grade A19 $19.34/hr Appraiser II: Grade A21 $21.32/hr Appraiser III: Grade A23 $23.51/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to adjust the salary for the Appraiser Aide/Appraiser I/II/III class series. Reasoning: These classifications are appropriately compensated. Child Support Services Child Support Assistant I increase Child Support Officer I/II/III Supervising Child Support Officer Child Support Special Programs Coordinator The Child Support Services Department has requested to increase the salaries for a variety of positions within the department. Proposed Grades and entry step: Child Support Assistant I: Grade A10 $12.47/hr Child Support Officer I: Grade B15 $16.31/hr Child Support Officer II: Grade B17 $17.98/hr Child Support Officer III: Grade B19 $19.82/hr Supv Child Support Officer: Grade A25 $25.92 /hr Child Support Special Programs Coord: Grade B21 $21.85/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to adjust the salary for the classifications listed above. Reasoning: These classifications are appropriately compensated. Community Development Building Inspector I/II to Plans Examiner I/II The Community Development Department has requested to reclassify an existing Building Inspector II to the Plans Examiner I/II class series. Proposed Grade and entry step: Plans Examiner I: Grade B22 $22.95/hr Plans Examiner II: Grade B23 $24.09/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends approving this request. Reasoning: The needs of the department have changed over time, and there is a need for a certified Plans Examiner who can perform these specialized functions. The recent fires have increased the need for the specialized position as the department expects a number of citizens will be rebuilding in addition to the normal workload. Cost Information: Funding for this position in Community Development is self-funded, therefore it will not affect the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) District Attorney District Attorney Investigator I/II and Chief District Attorney Investigator salary adjustment The District Attorney's Office has requested a salary adjustment for the District Attorney Investigator I/II and Chief District Attorney Investigator classifications. Proposed Grade and entry step: DA Investigator I: 626 $27.4681 hr DA Investigator II: B28 $30.75/ hr Chief DA Investigator: C23 $6,758/mo The Committee recommends denying the request to adjust the salary for the classifications listed above. Reasoning: These classifications are appropriately compensated. Public Services Facilities Maintenance Technician salary adjustment The Public Services Department requested to adjust the salary for the Facilities Maintenance Technician. Proposed Grade and entry step: Grade A21 $21.32/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to change the salary of the existing Facilities Maintenance Technician, however, recommends creating a Facilities Maintenance Technician I/II class series with the Facilities Maintenance Technician I tied to the current grade of A19, and the Facilities Maintenance Technician II tied to grade A21. Reasoning: Since this classification may be used in other departments, the Committee was concerned that staff members in those departments do a more limited scope of work. Creating the flex classification will allow the County to ensure that the scope of work appropriate for the compensation. In addition, the Committee was concerned that if vacancies were to occur in the future it would be difficult to attract qualified candidates given the anticipated increase in available construction jobs due to the fires. Cost Information: There will be an increased cost to the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) Sheriff's Office Accountant II to Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator I/II The Sheriff's Office has requested to create a unique Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator I/II class series, and reclassify an existing Accountant II incumbent to the new classification. Proposed Grade and entry step: Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator I: Grade B23 $24.09/hr Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator II: Grade B25 $26.56/hr Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to create a new Sheriff-Coroner Fiscal Coordinator I/II class series, however, does recommend reclassifying the Accountant II incumbent to a Senior Staff Services Analyst. Reasoning: Over time, the responsibilities of this position have changed, including the need for this position to be supervisory. The Committee believes that the responsibilities of this position, including the supervisory responsibilities are covered by the existing Senior Staff Services Analyst classification. Cost Information: There will be an increased cost to the general fund. (Requires Meet and Confer) Sheriff-Coroner Administrative Manager salary adjustment The Sheriff's Office requested a salary adjustment for the Sheriff-Coroner Administrative Manager classification. Proposed Grade and entry step: Grade C25 $5,983/mo Committee Action: The Committee recommends denying the request to adjust the salary for the Sheriff-Coroner Administrative Manager classification. Reasoning: The position is properly compensated within the confines of the County salary schedule. Civil Unit Coordinator title and job description change The Sheriff's Office requested a title change from Civil Unit Coordinator to Civil Coordinator, and a change in the minimum qualifications. The department is not proposing to change the salary grade for this position. Current Grade and entry step: Grade 612 $17.0324 Committee Action: The Committee recommends approving the request with no change in salary. Reasoning: The duties of the position have not changed, and the minimum qualifications are still within the appropriate range for the current salary within the constraints of the guidelines used to determine salaries for classifications in the County. Cost Information: There is no change in cost related to this change. (Requires meet and Confer) Veteran's Services Office Veteran's Services Officer salary adjustment The Department of Health Services/Veteran's Services Office requested a salary adjustment for the Veteran's Services Officer classification. Proposed Grade and entry step: Grade A29 $5,460/mo Committee Action: The Committee recommends approving the request to adjust the salary for the Veteran's Services Officer classification. Reasoning: The compensation for this classification is currently not consistent with other County managers. In addition, given the limited pool of individuals qualified for this position, it is in the best interest of the County to increase the salary in an effort to ensure retention of the incumbent. Cost Information: The increased costs will be covered by an increase in Veteran's Subvention funding. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): See above. STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff requests that your Board approve in concept these recommendations and authorize the Human Resources Director to initiate the meet and confer process with the applicable employee associations as needed. Thank you for your consideration. cc: Human Resources Director
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, approved the Classification and Compensation Committee Findings and Recommendations.. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: Human Resources Deputy Director Sarah Jansen presented the item to the Board. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.7Consideration of Agreement by and between the County of Lake and the South Lake County Fire Protection District for the Submittal of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program DR-4240 Project Sub-Application and Authorize the Chair to Sign. Agreement approved — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 26, 2016 · To: Board of Supervisors · From: Gloria Fong, Staff Services Analyst, South Lake County Fire Protection District · Subject: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Application

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For the Board of Supervisors' consideration is the attached Agreement for the County to submit the subject item on South Lake County Fire Protection District's (SLCFPD) behalf. This is an opportunity for SLCFPD to receive funding assistance to replace the 25 plus year old generators at their four fire stations. The loss of power for an extended period during the Valley fire and the problems experienced caused us to assess the generators that have been determined to need replacement and have reached their life span. The County's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies the most dangerous natural disaster threats, their probability and risk, and best approaches to mitigate these threats. The plan assesses these hazards and determines that damage control and disaster relief support would be required from local governments for emergency medical services and temporary shelter of injured and displaced persons. It includes the fire districts and as such makes SLCFPD part of its plan. To have the ability to provide these services and shelter in the event of power loss, a secondary source of power is necessary. As the result of a major declaration of a federal disaster and an adopted Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, the County must be the primary applicant. The grant is for 75 percent funding and matching of 25 percent. SLCFPD is prepared make the match and has the funds available and is prepared to complete the subject item for the County to submit on our behalf. We would appreciate your support for this opportunity to receive funding made available through the DR-4240 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Consideration of Agreement by and between the County of Lake and the South Lake County Fire Protection District for the Submittal of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program DR-4240 Project Sub-Application and Authorize the Chair to Sign.

No additional funding requested — the memo's cost fields were left blank, which on this form means the item is already budgeted.

Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Gloria Fong, Staff Services Analyst, South Lake County Fire Protection District DATE: May 26, 2016 SUBJECT: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Application EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For the Board of Supervisors' consideration is the attached Agreement for the County to submit the subject item on South Lake County Fire Protection District's (SLCFPD) behalf. This is an opportunity for SLCFPD to receive funding assistance to replace the 25 plus year old generators at their four fire stations. The loss of power for an extended period during the Valley fire and the problems experienced caused us to assess the generators that have been determined to need replacement and have reached their life span. The County's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies the most dangerous natural disaster threats, their probability and risk, and best approaches to mitigate these threats. The plan assesses these hazards and determines that damage control and disaster relief support would be required from local governments for emergency medical services and temporary shelter of injured and displaced persons. It includes the fire districts and as such makes SLCFPD part of its plan. To have the ability to provide these services and shelter in the event of power loss, a secondary source of power is necessary. As the result of a major declaration of a federal disaster and an adopted Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, the County must be the primary applicant. The grant is for 75 percent funding and matching of 25 percent. SLCFPD is prepared make the match and has the funds available and is prepared to complete the subject item for the County to submit on our behalf. We would appreciate your support for this opportunity to receive funding made available through the DR-4240 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: Consideration of Agreement by and between the County of Lake and the South Lake County Fire Protection District for the Submittal of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program DR-4240 Project Sub-Application and Authorize the Chair to Sign.
On motion of Supervisor Comstock, and by vote of the Board, approved the Agreement by and between the County of Lake and the South Lake County Fire Protection District for the Submittal of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program DR-4240 Project Sub-Application. The motion carried by the following vote:
Clerk’s notes: South Lake County Fire Protection District Analyst Gloria Fong presented the item to the Board. Battalion Chief Mike Wink with South Lake County Fire Protection District also spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.
9.8(Sitting as Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 for a Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project - Planning Grant and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement and authorize Chair to sign Resolution Adopted — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 18, 2016 · To: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District · From: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director · Subject: (Sitting as Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 for a Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project - Planning Grant and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement and authorize Chair to sign

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is requesting the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District (District) approve a resolution authorizing the Water Resources Director to file a grant application and execute a grant agreement with the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways. This item is not anticipated to be controversial; therefore we are requesting this item be placed on the consent agenda. The Lake County Watershed Protection District (LCWPD) proposes funding a project in the amount of $178,971.91 to study the feasibility of installing electronic boat ramp gates at the eight most popular boat launch facilities on Clear Lake. The study will evaluate physical constraints of the various sites as well as the economic implications. Grant funds are reimbursable with no match required but encouraged. The Department cannot receive grant funds for this project's management; therefore project management of $7,831.40 will be used as match. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Resolution authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to file Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for a for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/16 grant titled Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting as Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 for a Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project - Planning Grant and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement and authorize Chair to sign
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District FROM: Scott De Leon, Public Works Director DATE: May 18, 2016 SUBJECT: (Sitting as Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 for a Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project - Planning Grant and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement and authorize Chair to sign EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is requesting the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District (District) approve a resolution authorizing the Water Resources Director to file a grant application and execute a grant agreement with the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways. This item is not anticipated to be controversial; therefore we are requesting this item be placed on the consent agenda. The Lake County Watershed Protection District (LCWPD) proposes funding a project in the amount of $178,971.91 to study the feasibility of installing electronic boat ramp gates at the eight most popular boat launch facilities on Clear Lake. The study will evaluate physical constraints of the various sites as well as the economic implications. Grant funds are reimbursable with no match required but encouraged. The Department cannot receive grant funds for this project's management; therefore project management of $7,831.40 will be used as match. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Resolution authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to file Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for a for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/16 grant titled Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None __Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting as Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 for a Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project - Planning Grant and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement and authorize Chair to sign
Supervisor Steele offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: Water Resources Director Scott DeLeon presented the item to the Board. Chamber of Commerce CEO Melissa Fulton spoke. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item is closed.
9.9(Sitting as Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application with the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 - Implementation Grant and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement and authorize Chair to sign Resolution Adopted — Pass
no itemized roll call in the official record
Staff memo

Date: May 19, 2016 · To: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District · From: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director · Subject: Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 and authorize Chair to sign

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is requesting the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District (District) approve a resolution authorizing the Water Resources Director to file a grant application and execute a grant agreement with the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways. This item is not anticipated to be controversial; therefore we are requesting this item be placed on the consent agenda. The Lake County Watershed Protection District (LCWPD) proposes funding a project in the amount of $47,430.01 to complete the following tasks: 1. Reprint an updated "Quashing the Quagga" brochure 2. Purchase and place two additional decontamination units 3. Purchase and install four educational banners at prominent location around Clear Lake 4. Purchase pop-up style canopy for use at events and tournaments 5. Mussel prevention advertising on the Sacramento River Watershed displays Grant funds are reimbursable with no match required but encouraged. The Department cannot receive grant funds for this project's management; therefore project management of $2,920.96 will be used as match. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Resolution authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to file Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for a for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/16 grant titled Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting as Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application with the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 - Implementation Grant and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement and authorize Chair to sign
Original memo text
..Title ..Body MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Directors, Lake County Watershed Protection District FROM: Scott De Leon, Water Resources Director DATE: May 19, 2016 SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 and authorize Chair to sign EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is requesting the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District (District) approve a resolution authorizing the Water Resources Director to file a grant application and execute a grant agreement with the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways. This item is not anticipated to be controversial; therefore we are requesting this item be placed on the consent agenda. The Lake County Watershed Protection District (LCWPD) proposes funding a project in the amount of $47,430.01 to complete the following tasks: 1. Reprint an updated "Quashing the Quagga" brochure 2. Purchase and place two additional decontamination units 3. Purchase and install four educational banners at prominent location around Clear Lake 4. Purchase pop-up style canopy for use at events and tournaments 5. Mussel prevention advertising on the Sacramento River Watershed displays Grant funds are reimbursable with no match required but encouraged. The Department cannot receive grant funds for this project's management; therefore project management of $2,920.96 will be used as match. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests the Board of Supervisors, sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Resolution authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to file Grant Application and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement for a for a California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/16 grant titled Clear Lake Mussel Prevention Improvement Project. FISCAL IMPACT: __ None _X_Budgeted __Non-Budgeted Estimated Cost: Amount Budgeted: Additional Requested: Annual Cost (if planned for future years): FISCAL IMPACT (Narrative): STAFFING IMPACT (if applicable): ..Recommended Action RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Sitting as Lake County Watershed Protection District, Board of Directors) - Consideration of Resolution Authorizing the Lake County Watershed Protection District to File a Grant Application with the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways Quagga and Zebra Mussel Infestation Prevention FY 2015/2016 - Implementation Grant and Signature Authorization to Execute Agreement and authorize Chair to sign
Supervisor Comstock offered the Resolution and it was passed by roll call vote:
Clerk’s notes: Water Resources Director Scott DeLeon presented the item to the Board. Chair Brown asked if anyone present wished to speak. No one wished to speak and the public input portion of this item was closed.

10. Closed Session

10.1Conference with Labor Negotiator: (a) County Negotiators: A. Grant, S. Harry, C. Huchingson, K. Ferguson and S. Jansen; and (b) Employee Organizations: DDAA, DSA, LCCOA, LCEA and LCSEA
10.2Conference with Legal Counsel: Significant Exposure to Litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9 I(d)(2)(e)(1) – One potential Claim. Closed Session Item
Clerk’s notes: The Board reconvened into Regular Session at 1:45 p.m. having taken no action.

11. Adjournment